Jump to content

JGMcD2

Community Member
  • Posts

    2,548
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by JGMcD2

  1. On 4/30/2024 at 11:02 PM, GreggTX said:

    We drafted a few OL in later rounds, but this was a deep draft for OL talent. What does the future look like? Will our OL be better than ever? They looked good last year, but not great. I think Josh's mobility made them look much better like when Flutie played vs Rob Johnson the sack magnet. Will we run a little more perhaps?

     

    What's your prediction a couple years out?

     

    I would also prefer that Grable takes the 9th spot. In my mind the only way La'el Collins should make the team is if he dramatically outperforms Van Demark or Grable. Otherwise, go with the guys who are younger, cheaper and controlled longer. 

     

    I do recall the mention of Will Clapp, but I didn't take that as Beane alluding to a better chance of making the roster than we think. It felt more like him saying they didn't feel any pressure to take a C as insurance for McGovern because they had already brought Clapp in. Same thing here for me, go with Van Pran-Granger (VPG) and take your chances with trying to put Clapp on the practice squad if you want the insurance after roster cut downs. 

     

    For the record, I'm hopeful that VPG is able to play well enough at C to allow McGovern to move back to LG. I'll feel so much better about our offensive line if we're just replacing the C position and the rest is status quo. 

     

    Dawkins (2027) - McGovern (2025) - Van Pran-Granger (2027) - Torrence (2026) - Brown (2024)

    Van Demark (2025) - Edwards (2025) - Anderson (2025) - Grable (2027)

     

    There's a chance this could be your OL room for 2024 and 2025 (possibly longer). Although I'm still somewhat skeptical we pursue an extension with Brown until after the season. 

  2. 1 hour ago, uticaclub said:

    The expectation for the Bills should be a championship, but the realistic expectation is a division championship and a second-round exit, as it has been in previous years. I believe it is more likely that Josh Allen will force a trade after 2025 instead of accepting a contract extension here. Even though he claims to love Buffalo, his ultimate goal is to win a championship. There is a reason why Allen did not take the full restructure, so that too much money wasn't pushed to the future, and he could potentially leave before his contract is up.

    It's funny that you're commenting on things with such a negative slant while you have apparently zero idea as to how anything actually works. 

     

    "Allen did not take the full restructure." Sir, Josh Allen doesn't have to agree to anything when it comes to a restructure. A restructure is taking the player's base salary and converting it to a signing bonus. It doesn't push any money down the road for Josh. He actually gets the money upfront in the form of a signing bonus, but the cap hit is spread evenly over the remainder of his contract. 

     

    It's a lever that Brandon Beane pulls... not Josh Allen. He only restructured for what he needed, in order to avoid running up the cap hit in future seasons. 

    • Like (+1) 3
    • Thank you (+1) 2
  3. 2 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

     

    I largely agree. While I think Van Demark is very likely to make it I do think Grable has a chance to dislodge him. They are similar player in terms of athletic profile. Vandy showed last pre-season that is very good at LT, but couldn't really get it at right tackle. If Grable can do both I think there is a world where they decide to go with him and a vet (I'm thinking specifically Collins in this space tbh). Equally given Beane mentioned Clapp specifically when asked about center the other day I wonder if he has a better shot in the building than we think. 

     

    I'd definitely like the final 9 to be your predicted 8 and Grable. But will be interesting to see how it plays out. If they are all healthy can Beane maybe swing one of his trade for a day 3 pick tricks?

    I would also prefer that Grable takes the 9th spot. In my mind the only way La'el Collins should make the team is if he dramatically outperforms Van Demark or Grable. Otherwise, go with the guys who are younger, cheaper and controlled longer. 

     

    I do recall the mention of Will Clapp, but I didn't take that as Beane alluding to a better chance of making the roster than we think. It felt more like him saying they didn't feel any pressure to take a C as insurance for McGovern because they had already brought Clapp in. Same thing here for me, go with Van Pran-Granger (VPG) and take your chances with trying to put Clapp on the practice squad if you want the insurance after roster cut downs. 

     

    For the record, I'm hopeful that VPG is able to play well enough at C to allow McGovern to move back to LG. I'll feel so much better about our offensive line if we're just replacing the C position and the rest is status quo. 

     

    Dawkins (2027) - McGovern (2025) - Van Pran-Granger (2027) - Torrence (2026) - Brown (2024)

    Van Demark (2025) - Edwards (2025) - Anderson (2025) - Grable (2027)

     

    There's a chance this could be your OL room for 2024 and 2025 (possibly longer). Although I'm still somewhat skeptical we pursue an extension with Brown until after the season. 

    • Like (+1) 3
    • Agree 3
  4. 12 minutes ago, eball said:

     

    Nice breakdown.  Note that the Bills can put Clayton on the PS and he won’t count against the limit because of the international player development program.

     

    I am rooting for Keaton Bills to make this team.  It’s just serendipitous to think of a guy wearing “Bills” on the back of a Bills jersey.

     

    Yes, good note on Clayton. 16 PS spots and he’d be the “17th” due to the IPP exemption. 

  5. 5 hours ago, Beck Water said:

    Oh, wow, I disagree - After cutting Morse and moving McGovern to center and backup David Edwards to G, I thought we were thin on IOL

    And then of course there was Ryan Van Demark as the swing tackle

     

    The draftees were late rounders, so I guess the UDFA feel they can compete?

    Explaining in a little more detail where my mind was when I said that...

     

    We carried 9 OL on the 53 last year:

    • Dawkins, Dion
    • Brown, Spencer
    • Torrence, O'Cyrus
    • McGovern, Connor
    • Morse, Mitch
    • Bates, Ryan
    • Edwards, David
    • Anderson, Alec
    • Van Demark, Ryan

    This year 7/9 OL are returning:

     

    Locks (5)

    • Dawkins, Dion
    • Brown, Spencer
    • Torrence, O'Cyrus
    • McGovern, Connor
    • Edwards, David

    This is our presumed starting 5 OL. The only thing that could change is McGovern moving back to LG and Edwards moving back to a reserve role. 

     

    High Probability to Make Roster (2)

    • Van Demark, Ryan
    • Anderson, Alec

    These guys are REALLY close to being locks in my opinion.

     

    The Bills signed Alec Anderson as an UDFA, and he spent all of 2022 on the practice squad and the entire 2023 season on the 53. Van Demark was a Colts UDFA in 2022 but like Anderson spent 2022 on our practice squad and all of 2023 on our 53. 

     

    The Bills have invested a lot of time/resources into developing both players and I think they clearly have a leg up on the competition. 

     

    New Veterans (3)

    • Collins, La'el
    • Clapp, Will
    • Doyle, Tommy*

    Collins has some guarantees, but I don't think he's a guarantee to make the roster, although that likely gives him a leg up. I don't think Clapp has a chance to make the roster unless there is an injury at the C position. Tommy Doyle fits here because he's coming off injury, but made the roster in 2021 and 2022, likely would've made it in 2023 before a season ending injury - he's fighting an uphill battle.

     

    Drafted Rookies (3)

    • Van Pran-Granger, Sedrick
    • Grable, Tylan
    • Clayton, Travis

    The way Beane spoke about Clayton after the draft, it seems like they've banking on him being the 17th guy on the Practice Squad. My gut tells me that Van Pran-Granger is nearly a lock for the reserve C role (I think this is possible with McGovern and Edwards being able to play G) and pundits seem to think he could end up starting for us this year. Grable is competing for a reserve T role with the likes of Collins, Doyle and Van Demark, if not he's likely another hopeful Practice Squad stash for Beane. 

     

    After walking through it I feel pretty comfortable saying we can predict who 8/9 lineman will be on the 53.

    • Dawkins, Dion
    • Brown, Spencer
    • Torrence, O'Cyrus
    • McGovern, Connor
    • Edwards, David
    • Anderson, Alec
    • Van Demark, Ryan
    • Van Pran-Granger, Sedrick

    That leaves Collins, Clapp, Doyle, Grable, Clayton, Edwards, Britton and Bills competing for 1 spot. 

     

    Jordan Schultz suggested that Keaton Bills *SHOULD* make this team. I just think that it's going to be an uphill battle for any of the UDFA to break camp on the 53. 

    • Like (+1) 7
    • Thank you (+1) 3
  6. 12 minutes ago, FireChans said:

    I will agree to a point that Diggs’ exit probably accelerated how bad the lack of succession plan was. But the Bills have sucked at their succession plans for the 2020 stars since.. well… 2020.

     

    Beane drafts a decent WR last year or two years ago and we are feeling much more comfortable with Coleman/Samuel/Shakir filling out the rest of the room. 

    You mean like when he drafted Khalil Shakir two years ago in the 5th round? 

  7. 22 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

    He is giving it to us straight. The Bills are in a rebuild year. So he went for all team captains. Guys that interviewed well. Guys that he believes set a new foundation of leadership in the building. He hunted for short term needs that fit the singular character profile he and McDermott feel comfortable with, at the expense of talent at premium positions. And he is telling the fanbase to temper our expectations without coming right out and saying it.

    That’s a pretty bold inference based off of a few words. 
     

    They’ve always drafted with a specific character profile in mind and didn’t eschew talent. What about his statement says they did now? 

     

    • Like (+1) 2
    • Thank you (+1) 2
  8. 5 minutes ago, Green Lightning said:

    Well, he's a Bill and one of us now and I will cheer him on. That said he's not a X and now one of many Bill pass catchers working the middle of the field. Still nobody for DCs to fear deep. No elite speed anywhere on this offense. I guess we're doing slow explosive plays.

    Curtis Samuel's Combine 40 time is in the 96th percentile for WR. 

     

    He's been in and flirted with being one of the Top 20 fastest ball carriers each season he's been in the NFL. 

    • Like (+1) 3
    • Thank you (+1) 1
  9. Considering Andy Reid has struggled to find a productive WR in KC outside of Tyreek Hill, I’m going to say I don’t care. 

     

    Also, Worthy may have the fastest 40 time, but it doesn’t guarantee he plays fast. He’s going to get beat to hell… he’s not Tyreek. Tyreek’s speed isn’t what makes him so unique - despite everyone wanting to boil it down to that. 

    • Agree 2
    • Thank you (+1) 2
  10. 1 hour ago, HappyDays said:

    My blockbuster trade prediction is:

     

    Bills receive:

    Justin Jefferson

    2025 4th

     

    Vikings receive:

    2024 1st

    2025 2nd

    Uhh you usually know things… 

     

    This would make sense for them when the recoup what they gave up to acquire Justin Herbert (per CTESPN). Draft a cheaper WR to pair with Addison. 

  11. 2 hours ago, Brand J said:

    If the Bills had simply drafted Jefferson instead of traded for Diggs, I believe they’d have at least one SB by now (provided Jefferson stayed as healthy as Diggs).
    If they had taken Metcalf or AJ Brown in the 2nd instead of Cody Ford, that’s even more compensation the team could’ve kept to hit on other players. 

    “Simply” 
     

    The decision wasn’t Diggs or Jefferson. The decision was Diggs or the 22nd pick. 

    • Like (+1) 5
    • Agree 5
×
×
  • Create New...