LTarmy

saw it today...first thing I did was buy Jets tickets ?

Marv gets an F just for the hire of Dixon Jauron. From what I read and heard, Marv was just a figure head, to make Bills fans forget about Donahue...who had angered Bills fans. Jauron had the most input of any one on the room...his picks just screamed of Jauron. Small, fast players....who were injury prone and struggle to play football.

I give him credit for brining some stability to that organization, but 0-6 in the Post Season is indefensible!!!

Yeah...he might want to consider changing that name

While we all can agree soccer can be violent, studies and stats support your statement. Keep in mind this. It is pretty much public knowledge that both the NFL and players withheld information on report concussions. So what information we do have, it is likely worse for football. Everyone knows that smacking your head against anything can cause some long term problems. I think the NFL for once is actually taking the right steps to prevent an identified player who had a concussion and putting him back on the field. This isn't bad, but people in general are resistant to good change (for what ever reason...and it is usually dumb) and are overdramatizing the long term effects of these changes.

People always overreact to change. Football 🏈 is still very popular in the US and the NFL is a cash cow. People who are saying it is a dying sport are just being dramatic. The south and the mid west are pipelines for college teams and they are suffering any recruiting issues because of head injuries. Players are bigger, stronger and faster then they were in the 60'sand 70s. Now we have science to help and treat head injuries and of course A group of fans are going to be upset about good change. The NFL needs to protect 20 year olds from making decisions to get back on the field when they have suffered a head injury. Just because you as a fan want to live in the past where you believe the sport was great...doesn't make it so. If you feel that way, go on YouTube and watch "the good old days". People always complain about change and then overreact to it and act as if the sky is falling.

Sullivan calls out the BS that has occurred in the FO for years. Despite what fans want to believe, he has been more right than wrong. Sullivan didn't get lost in the win against the Jets. Throughout the preseason, these WRs struggle to gain separation and while targeting Shady McCoy and Clay worked against the Jets, eventually these WRs are going to need to show of the can step up in crunch time. I don't mind Sully at all. He asks the hard questions and fans hate him because he doesn't buy into all the nonsense that the FO has tried to sell us (Levy as a GM, Nix as a GM, the Jauron no huddle offense, Brandon as a GM, Rex as a HC, etc). He calls them out. How is he misinformed? He has been more right than wrong over the last 17 years. And while sports is suppose to be fun, this crap over the last 17 years has been nothing short of a joke.

I think people are overreacting on the lack of a pass rush. The plan was obviously to get the ball out quickly and the Jets WRs TJ get yards after the catch. Credit has to go to the D-Line for the lack of quality runs allowed and to the LBs/Dbs for not allowing a big play. They allowed about 200 yards...that is a good day. They held the Jets to 200 yards and one TD...that is pretty good. It is on reasonable to expect the Bills to shut them out.

Maybe, but seeing how these WRs struggle to get open in ththe preseason and didn't appear to get open against the Jets, I think it is a viable question. You can object all you want, this game plan worked last year against sub 500 teams, but when real teams come in, will the WRs get open or will you blame Tyrod for not getting the ball to them?

People want to believe that the Bills were holding back and exploiting matchups. The question is a viable one...were the lack of cataches due to the WRs not getting off the line.

The concern I have about the lack of targets to WRs is this....was it gameplanned? Or was it because they were struggling to get off the line and get open? It isn't a Debbie downer question...it is a real question about these WRs, that they have no one proven that can go deep and they struggled to beat coverage in preseason. This formula may work against the worst team in the NFL, but against teams that have real weapons, where you need WRs to get open, can these WRs get open? That is what Sully imo was getting at. To not acknowledge this issue is silly.

If there is any way to get out of the contract (i.e. What Houston did with Brock Osweilier) they need to consider it. Whaley learned from Nix to mismanage the cap and contracts. This contract is horrible for a guy like Dareus as there is no accountability on his part. Maybe he will get it, but I doubt it. He hasn't yet.

As a poster stated, tanking in ththe NFL is basically pointless. You stockpile picks and hope you land a QB. KC was always going to be a good team...so that pick was always going to be high

Do people watch football? The Chiefs have been consistently good since Reid arrived. He made that trade knowing his team would win 10 or more games and have no chance at a QB early in 2018. He was Mahones because he felt he could develop him over two years. This isn't rocket 🚀 science 🔬 people!!!!

If we had a passing QB or a proven QB, then I may be one of those whiners. However, this team is building for the future and stockpiling picks. They are tearing down the foundation built by a shoddy GM. Time will tell if these moves work, but these moves needed to be done