Jump to content

HomeskillitMoorman

Community Member
  • Posts

    2,055
  • Joined

Posts posted by HomeskillitMoorman

  1. 10 minutes ago, CowboyBill said:

    If you could only upgrade one group, would it be better to upgrade O-line or receivers? I would say O-line because Allen can work with the receivers. If O-line could protect long enough for routes to develop or open holes for backs, that would go a long ways. Allen is going to make everyone around him better. I really think he works best with fast receivers but they need at least a year with Allen to adjust to the velocity of his throws. 

     

    If we're trying to be 9-7 with a one and done playoff appearance, heavily upgrading one of them is fine. If we're looking to be great, both the o-line and WR's need a lot of work. 

    9 minutes ago, Da webster guy said:

    I don't think he has all trash around him at all positions.

     

    Zay and Foster are good receivers.  McKenzie gets big separation every time I watch him.   The line isn't good but most NFL Olines aren't.    The line played well and graded out well in the 2nd half, both Miller and Boettger even.   Josh wasn't getting killed nearly as he had in previous weeks, certainly not as much as Rivers was vs KC or Cousins was last week.

     

    The sack at the end of the first drive that cost us 3 points was on Daboll for having him do a full drop on the 30 yard line instead of a quick out/throw away play.

     

    Its definitely not ideal but it's not gruesome out there like Carolina or Zona.

     

     

     

     

     

    Zay is awful. Foster has looked solid and McKenzie could be a good depth receiver. We need at least 1 top shelf WR and more quality depth, and a real TE. 

     

    The o-line has been horrible. A couple of quarters here and there doesn't really change that. 

     

    Why does it really matter if it's not "as gruesome" as Carolina or Zona? Is that the standard or do we want the team to be a real championship contender? 

  2. 25 minutes ago, WideNine said:

    Rather than bitching (complaining, nit-picking, whining, pick the appropriate adjective) about offensive production under Daboll or with Allen under center, I think we should all be more amazed that this motley collection below even have the capability to move the ball at all against other NFL teams. Just food for thought.

     

     

     

    Ladies and Gentlemen these are your Buffalo Bills!

     

    The starting roster on Offense for the Detroit game (at least for many of the snaps):

     

    79 Jordan Mills T (Practice Squad Player)

    73 Dion Dawkins T (2nd Year Starter)

    75 Wyatt Teller G (Rookie -  inactive thru Week 8)

    76 John Miller G / Ike Boettger (4th year struggling player, lost snaps during the game to Ike Boettger Practice Squad)

    72 Ryan Groy C (bounced around the NFL for 5 years PS w/Chicago, traded to NE and spent that time on IR, injury settlement, waived and went to TB Practice Squad then to Bills)

     

    16 Robert Foster (Practice Squad)

    11 Zay Jones (struggling 2nd Year Player)

    19 Isaiah McKenzie (Practice Squad)

    35 Keith Ford (Practice Squad)

    80 Jason Croom (Practice Squad)

    12 Josh Allen (Rookie QB)

     

    It's both encouraging and a little discouraging. Encouraging in the sense that he's been able to be decent and show considerable promise with such trash around him. Discouraging that this is what the FO has after 2 offseasons, and that we need that same FO to fill so many holes with high quality players. 

     

    The o-line especially just needs a ton of work. Dawkins is really only an adequate starter at LT and while we hope Teller can be a starter, we don't really know that he can yet. And that's it. Everyone else on the o-line is horrific, including our "depth" guys. 

  3. 11 minutes ago, vorpma said:

    Tampa Bay won a Super Bowl with Trent Dilfer; Jim McMahon did not light up the sky, and Bob Griese had Czonka and the no name defense; there are no absolutes in the NFL but winning!! There are no emotional attachments by NFL head coaches to offense or defense - running or passing; the only attachment is the score board and won loss column; we are an excitement driven society with a millennial fan base that demands arena football!

     

    How long did Tampa stay a SB contender after they won? What sunk them? There's also plenty of elite defenses that never win it. 

     

    I want a team that's going to be a perennial contender, and you have the best odds of doing that if you have a franchise QB. This has been proven for as long as football has been around. I don't really even know what the argument is anymore because that is the direction we went in, but I guess I'm glad we have the people in place that we do that had proper value placed on a franchise QB instead of people that aren't able to comprehend that. 

  4. Nice write-up.

     

    Agree about Lorax, the dude was a beast yesterday. I don't care how old he is, he can play for my team any day while he's still got a little something in the tank.

     

    I was generally fine with Allen's game yesterday, like you said it was a rookie performance. But I like what I see and I like his mentality. I love a couple of the little things, like how he looks to take advantage of the free plays when he draws a defender Offside by going deep, reminds me of Aaron Rodgers if you've ever seen how opportunistic he is on those. He also understands giving his receivers a chance to make a play downfield and that you can get a PI call even if they don't. The possibility of a PI is a weapon and he gets that.

     

    What I saw from the other team reiterates how important it is to have a big-time playmaking WR. A guy like Golladay makes a big difference and almost won the game for them. We gotta get Josh one of those! 

     

     

     

     

  5. I love posts like this that don't actually have any real long-term vision.

     

    Dominant defenses are not sustainable for long-term success. If you actually really look at this league, the teams that are perennial contenders are the teams with franchise QB's and competent offenses. It's awesome to have a great defense, but no team in the league is able to keep one for an extended period of time. The Bears D I'm sure will stay at least good for a while, but watch, their window for being at this level is going to be pretty small as they start to lose guys. 

     

    I don't think anyone's ever been against having a good D or run game...but the priority and rightfully so was about getting that franchise QB. It's so much easier to get everything else to fall into place once you have that. 

  6. 39 minutes ago, RalphWilson'sNewWar said:

    That is what was so intersting about today’s game.

     

    The teams energy, the fans noise, head coaches speech and player reactions after the game.

     

    you woudl think it was a good team beating another good team while getting ready for the playoffs.

     

    not sure if I’d call it embarrassing delusional or proudly encouraging.  Probably somewhere in the middle.

     

    It's encouraging, for sure. 

     

    To me, once you have your QB, there's no such thing as tanking anymore. It's important to start establishing a winning culture...by winning. I think it does make a difference if we finish the year out strong, not only for the players here but to try to become a somewhat attractive free agent destination. 

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Thank you (+1) 1
  7. 1 hour ago, GunnerBill said:

     

    Case Keenum > Tyrod Taylor. 

     

    That decision is the final nail in Joseph's coffin. Usually when a GM thinks about firing a Head Coach after one year it is the right call and he should follow through and do it because otherwise you just waste a year. Exhibit A: Terry Pegula with Rex Ryan. Exhibit B: John Elway with Vance Joseph. Someone send that memo to the Cardinals owners. 

     

    Yup, it probably is. I honestly think for some coaches the objective is just to keep it close, not to win the game. 

    2 minutes ago, Doc Brown said:

    Yup.  It shows a lack of faith in your offense and isn't that atypical for a head coach with a defensive background.  If you don't make it then the Browns are still backed up near their own endzone and you rely on your defense to give your offense another shot.  It's possible that decision was the nail in his coffin.  Do you think Elway would've been pissed if he was the Broncos quarterback in that situation and they kicked a field goal?

     

    Absolutely, it's the right call all the way around to go for it. 

     

    And oh yeah, Elway would have been livid. Joseph probably wasn't thinking about that in that moment, but having a former QB and especially a HOF one as a GM is going to be killer here. 

  8. 3 hours ago, Shortchaz said:

    At the time I was okay with that, they had timeouts and their defense was playing great. With that field goal, even if the Browns scored a td, the Broncos were still in the game. I usually agree with your argument, but was okay with the field goal in this case.

     

    I can't agree, they had a shot right there to get the first down or take the lead on 4th and 1 from inside the opposition's 10. Gotta go for the killshot there. 

    3 hours ago, John from Riverside said:

    and the browns going for the 1st when they could have made it a 4 point game to force the TD is LUNACY

     

    It worked out for them in the end...but that could easily have been a disaster

     

    I loved that call. 4th and 1 and a shot to end the game right there and then with the ball in the hands of one of your best players...I'm taking that chance all day. They didn't get it but I have no problem at all with the logic there.

     

    If McD ever makes a call like that, I'm behind it every time. But most likely he kicks the FG in both scenarios. 

    • Like (+1) 1
  9. 2 minutes ago, CincyBillsFan said:

    We'll never know who the Bills wanted between Allen & Darnold unless someone at one Bills Drive spills the beans.  My understanding though, based entirely on rumor, was that the Bills knew the Browns were taking Mayfield and that of the remaining 4 guys they favored Allen. 

     

    We do know they wanted Allen a lot more then Rosen and aggressively moved up to keep Arizona from taking Allen.

     

    I honestly wanted Darnold but I was at least relieved we got Allen over Rosen. I think the Rosen douchebaggery stuff was a little overblown...I just didn't think he was as talented as the other guys. 

  10. 15 minutes ago, Steptide said:

    Darnold coming along nicely. Looks to be a it improved since his injury. I believe he was the bills 1st choice at qb in the draft 

     

    I do too, I think he's going to be really good. Just like on Allen, people way overreact when a rookie QB goes through some early struggles. But that should be a really good rivalry for years to come. 

  11. 5 hours ago, Cripple Creek said:

    Then why does your thread title say "I want no part of Tyrell Williams?"

     

    Because I really don't. I don't think he's a #1 or 2, and I think we have a couple of depth WR's in Zay and Foster and can probably find one or two more like that at cheaper prices. I think Tyrell's going to get overpaid. 

    8 minutes ago, K-GunJimKelly12 said:

    I would actually love Tate on a 1-3 year deal.  Exactly the type of receiver who is going to find an open spot after Allen does his scrambling out of the pocket.  I think it would be a good fit.

     

    I like Tate too, and I'm usually opposed to bringing older players (or Notre Dame guys) in. But I think he still has something left and I like his game. You're right about him being a good fit for Allen too. Hes an instinctive player that could definitely help Allen when he's on the run. 

    8 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

    Would not be opposed to Sanu either.......

     

    Sanu's OK. I'd rather have Tate and another guy by trade or a high draft pick. 

  12. 9 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

    Yea I am not a fan either. I hadn't realised until speaking to our Jets correspondent on here the other day that Robby Anderson is a RFA. He is now head and shoulders my #1 choice at receiver. If the Jets try and whack the low tender on him I'd make my move. Ironically my 2nd choice remains Onunwa but his constant injuries do worry me.

     

    I like Enunwa as a player too, from the old eye test. But I think they're going to keep him, it sounds like he's a big part of their leadership. 

  13. 6 minutes ago, PetermanThrew5Picks said:

    He's an improvement no doubt. 10x the player than KB was.

     

    But I agree I'm not going to bank on him as no 1. He's just good depth teams like the.. CHARGERS.. have in their arsenal.

     

    While he may make us better we're in trouble if he's our best. Which is why he's not the best where he is.

     

    I get that part. That's kind of what I mean, I don't want us to break the bank on him. If someone overpays for that guy, I don't want it to be us. 

  14. I've seen people clamor for him this upcoming offseason...possibly an overreaction since I admittedly don't watch the Chargers much...but he reminded me too much of KB. I know he had a highlight reel catch, but also had some bad drops, doesn't really fight for the ball, fumbled it...we need a way better player than this guy. 

    • Like (+1) 1
  15. 17 minutes ago, hondo in seattle said:

    Nobody knows if Allen is going to be a franchise QB.

     

    On the one hand, anyone who says he's so bad that it's just not going to happen is either delusional or just not watching.   Allen has proven his ability to make big time NFL throws.  The question is: can he do it consistently?  And that depends on his biomechanics, ability to read defenses & find receivers, the talent around him, and all that.   NFL QBs sometimes get better and sometimes they don't.  There's no foolproof way of prognosticating this.  

     

    On the other hand, those who think it's certain that Allen will be franchise QB are also delusional.  There's just no guarantee.  

     

    In the end, one camp will be proven right and we'll hear the gloating told-you-so's.   But any certainty at either end of the spectrum at this point is misguided.  

     

    As I fan I see positive signs.  I see why Beane drafted the kid and hope for the best.  I don't care at all what Barnwell thinks or writes.  

     

     

     

     

    This is probably closest to the truth. There's no question that the trash O-line and lack of legit weapons have hurt him and probably has gotten into his head a little bit in terms of him bailing out of the pocket early at times, and I do agree that while his abilities as a runner is an overall positive, he needs to be smarter about it and limit the abuse he takes. I actually think he's done a better job of that in the last couple of games. 

     

    But I don't think it can be assumed that the issues will automatically be resolved with a better o-line and upgraded weapons either, I don't think we've seen enough to determine that. 

     

    I'm optimistic about him too though. This is a playmaker's league and the dude is a playmaker. He's a way different QB than Luck so I'm not comparing their skill sets...but he reminds me of the way Luck at the beginning of his career was constantly looking to push the ball downfield, which I think he's getting more freedom to do again with Reich in now.  I loved it, and I love that Allen has that mentality so far. 

    • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...