Ramza86
-
Posts
1,524 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Ramza86
-
-
Honestly if the Bills are going to lose...I hope you get the win out of it. Good luck.
-
1 hour ago, twoandfourteen said:
But Bills fans who just wanted to move on are all racists who don't understand that you can win with Tyrod as long as he has the right pieces around him and a good defense.
Seems like he has that in Cleveland right now...........hows that working out for him?
Label me a racist then lol.
-
1
-
-
On 9/19/2018 at 10:45 AM, matter2003 said:
It's irrelevant. People who succeed will do it regardless of the circumstances they are given. If they have the talent, it won't matter. People who say this type of stuff are much more like Vontae Davis than Kyle Williams. When the going gets tough they just cry and whine and pack up their things and go home. PRetty sure Mark Sheppard is not very successful, people who are don't think like that.
Uh......
-
nah man...im already ok with 0-8.
-
3
-
2
-
-
18 hours ago, Coach Tuesday said:
Positives
Stands tall in the pocket and is not phased by the rush
Goes through his progressions
Can make any throw
Mobility and toughness
Isn’t Nate Peterman
Negatives
Doesn’t recognize pre-snap looks (shifts, blitzes, protection adjustments)
Footwork regressed today
Drifts sideways under pressure instead of stepping up into a muddy pocket
Doesnt trust his eyes - waits too long to make throws to open receivers
Mental clock is still too slow
Accuracy remains an issue
Yeah im ok with this. This offense will do him zero favors...footwork and accuracy to me are going to be problems he wont fix this year. Just because of the oline and broken pockets they consistently give him.
Mental clock, presnap, stepping up..that stuff will come with experience. if he is good enough to learn it.
-
5 minutes ago, ddaryl said:
We have a porous OL so he has to be. In the NFL the quick pass is a big part of keeping D's honest... If you don't have that then you greatly reduced your ability to be an NFL QB. You can not tell me that Ben or Stafford never had the quick slant in their repertoire
Im sure Josh would love to throw a quick slant to AB, Juju, Golden Tate, Kenny Gollady.
We have Zay Jones and Kelvin Benjamin.....
-
44 minutes ago, Buffalo Barbarian said:
Every time the BILLS come up every person on there laughs and chuckles and says good luck.
I know we deserve it, just tired of being a joke in the league.
As long as our line is the way it is....the laughing will never stop.
-
1
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, Johnnycage46 said:
I think Peterman in practice and preseason is a completely different player than in regular season. Peterman's abysmal game Sunday forced the Bill's hand on moving to Allen.
I agree with this. Hes just has no comfort during live games. Not having an Oline doesnt help either.
-
Just now, BillsEnthusiast said:
If Peterman can survive behind that line, the big guy can too.
Lol. Normally id agree...but Josh is one of those guys that has no problem taking a hit and usually is around contact. Hes gonna get beat up way more than Peterman would.
-
Just now, FeelingOnYouboty said:
Unless he gets injured he shouldn't lose this job again this year. Let him take his lumps.
Problem is...those lumps can put him in concussion protocol with this line.
-
Just now, Doc said:
"Is his supporting cast, though?" is the question.
God no. I think Peterman should play the rest of the year. Unless he gets hurt...which is very likely...or the Oline shows that it can protect our 1st round investment. -
On 9/9/2018 at 5:23 PM, Trogdor said:
I know that people are looking for a pick me up, but he didn't do anything special. He didn't show anything in garbage time that would justify this post. He made a couple of good rushes, but it made no change. I hope he starts going forward, but lets not get ahead of ourselves. This team is going to suck.
I want to say he had about 3-4 well placed balls on key plays that just did not get caught.
I think hes good enough to keep us in a game....maybe? lol
-
Tuel would have won that game yesterday. Book it.
-
23 minutes ago, Steptide said:
Yes, we could be the worst team in the NFL. Time will tell, but hear me out a little.
Last year against the saints our starting qb went 9/18 for 56 yards. Our defense gave up 280 yards rushing. We lost the game 47-10, and had a late 4th quarter td by none other than nate Peterman. Ironically had Peterman not come in late in the 4th, the final score would've probably been 47-3, at home.
Yes, yesterday was horrendous, and a terrible way to start the season, but I don't believe what we saw yesterday is gonna be what we see all season. It'll be really interesting to see how the bills respond next week at home
Unfortunately we play tough teams and a lot of them are away games. I honestly think were looking at 0-8 or 1-7
-
-
3 minutes ago, ScottLaw said:
Don't think McBeane make it to next year if they go 0-16.
Believe in something. Even if it means sacrificing everything.
-
1
-
-
Cause....Josh Allen will 100% give us a better chance to win....but he may also get hurt playing behind this pathetic line. Just go 0-16 and improve next year.
-
As much as id like the bills to win...if that online is anywhere near what it showed against the bengals 0-8 is a real possibility.
-
22 minutes ago, Midwest1981 said:
... and not in the way you think. In fact, it may have very little to do with him. But it's his situation- THIS situation- that makes it inherently difficult for him, as well as the Bills. Let me explain. First of all, what I was afraid would happen if Peterman won the job HAS happened. Not just "Joe" (largely informed) "Fan" but also the media- Colin Cowherd each of the last two days has corroborated this, to cite but one example- are snickering at Peterman starting because of the "five picks in one half" performance he may never live down. And Peterman beating out Allen naturally leads to more snickers, "Wow, if Josh Allen can't even beat out Nathan Peterman"... Josh Allen can't win from the perspective that it was widely acknowledged leading up to the draft, even among Allen supporters, that he required patience. But then when he's granted that patience it's not because he's not ready as much as it's perceived he'll never be ready, if he can't beat up the "abominable" likes of Nathan Peterman.
That's just one problem.
This is not a problem at all. Nobody cares what Colin Cowherd/National Media says. He said he was wrong about Josh Allen two weeks ago and he will be great.
22 minutes ago, Midwest1981 said:The other problem is... this is the NFL in 2018. How patient are Bills fans- and the Bills themselves- willing to be? I'm absolutely willing to be patient; Allen has demonstrated enough to make me believe that he isn't the fundamentally lost cause many summarily dismissed him as pre-draft... but the Bills' surrounding cast, skill position "weaponry" and especially our offensive line, has also demonstrated enough that they could really threaten to undo any of the progress Allen has made and have him running for his life, locking onto targets, suffering mechanically, and even suffering serious injury (we were all lucky he remained unscathed from preseason's week #3) if he's out there playing any time soon.
I understand that trading up for Allen/Edmunds cost of 5 of our top-65 picks. But it was still inexcusable to do so little with our remaining draft capital- not until deep in day #3- to provide some offensive help for the highest QB we've ever taken. Yes, I know that will be addressed in time, specifically next offseason. But QB's don't get the same time now that they used to.
Yes, I'm willing to be patient. But in the new CBA (signed 7 years ago)... QB's are MUCH easier to move on from than before- the financial commitment/entanglement is just no longer there. We didn't sign Allen to a 6-year, $78 million dollar deal with $50 million guaranteed like Sam Bradford did in 2010 (or Stafford the year before... or Alex Smith four years before, who lasted 8 years in San Francisco despite atrocious early career play). Remember the outcry by many when Doug Marrone benched E.J. Manuel after week #4 of just his sophomore season? "You don't- you CAN'T- bench a QB after just 15-20 starts!? He needs at least 30." Well, we did, and other than a week 17 game in 2016 to spite Tyrod and the recently fired Rex Manuel never started another game.
Just two years ago the Broncos traded up in the 1st-round to draft Paxton Lynch. Well, a mere four starts later- those four starts were evidently enough- and he's not only not starting; he isn't even on Denver's roster. There's also some consensus that 2016 #1 overall pick Jared Goff was another really bad year in 2017- if it resembled 2016- from quite possibly the Rams looking for the next guy.
I'm not saying that any of this is right- I'm just saying that it 'is,' at least how other teams have operated recently, given that the CBA allows teams to extricate out of lesser high 1st-round contracts and given irrationally impatient owners & fanbases. I'm willing to give Allen the time he needs but Buffalo must be, too. And unfortunately we don't have an Alex Smith having his best statistical season and leading the Chiefs to a divisional title to obscure that our rookie is sitting. Instead we have Nathan Peterman and the jokes that follow.
Paxton Lynch? Josh Allen has shown more in one camp than Paxton Lynch in 3.
Being ranked 32 by the media...butt of the jokes.....wont change the fact that this team will still continue to make improvements and become a winning team. Like every other team in the NFL. Like....why does it matter. Theyll stop caring about those things when we produce a good football team.
-
3 hours ago, 4merper4mer said:
AJ's spectacular comeback vs the Da Bears may have convinced them that Mack was a necessity and caused them to up their offer, leapfrogging the Bills. McDermot should have put in Logan Thomas for Q4.
-
Josh would hit the ground 20 times a game.
More times you get sacked/knocked down. More chances you get hurt.
Thats why Mr. Lombardi.
-
3
-
-
Id put peterman in for a couple of series.
Let Josh go the rest of the game. -
Just now, Boca BIlls said:
If a QB gets ruined they were never meant to be a starter in the first place.
How about concussed....injured.....surgery.
That counts as ruined....and that may be a real convern with this Oline.
-
Statistics only show you the result and its only used for general use. Stats dont mean chit without seeing how it happened.
QB A
Throw 1 - Low screen pass, RB has to dive to catch the ball. No gain.
Throw 2 - 10 yard out route, DB jumps the route. Slips through his hands and WR catches it for a gain of 10.
Throw 3 - 18 yard post route QB throws behind the WR, WR reaches behind him and catches is with one hand. Gain of 18.
3/3 for 28 Yards. %100. What a beast.
QB B -
Throw 1 - 15 yard curl route, right in between the numbers. Complete for a gain of 18
Throw 2 - Pressure up the middle. QB avoids the sack and manages to throw it away.
Throw 3 - 8 yard slant....strike down the middle, hits WR in the hands, bounces up and its intercepted.
1/3 for 18 yard and an INT. Awful.
Shady and the Running Backs moving forward
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
Id rather gain two with this offense than negative 3 on a bounce out from Mccoy.
The shorter the 3rd down the more options we have to convert.
This is a really good idea. It would def keep defenses on their toes and help with the quick passing attack.