Buffarukus
-
Posts
1,342 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Buffarukus
-
-
15 hours ago, Andy1 said:
Did Jordan Neely physically assault anyone?
If he only threatened with words, then the issue is if one can use deadly force in response to feeling threatened by speech. Neely had mental issues but that alone doesn’t justify killing him.by that logic then one must wait to be assaulted or murdered to react? if i get in your face and say i will kill you until the moment i physically touch or pull a weopon..which could be seconds what can you do? 3 women who were attacked werent so lucky that only words were used. can a police officer do anything in that situation? its only words at that point. planes and other instances where "freakouts" caused forced restraint of people didnt see alot of outcry about reactionary force up till now. pretty dangerous now as public transit and all around violence is increasing. precedent after precedent is to not defend yourself, hope for the best and mind your buisness if your not directly involved. sorry. if your the aggressor YOU should be the only one who should be concerned about any of those things.
THIS is what the left wanted. less police. more revolving doors for violent offenders. you get citizens who are not equipped or trained having to defend themselves and when it is a messy outcome..prosecute them too aka just let criminals do what they will.
so. it was in a confined space so distancing from the person threatening was hard or impossible.
3 men felt threatened enough to restrain this man with many other calling the police. that makes it pretty clear that everyone on that train agreed they were in immediate danger with not alot of options.
daniel perry was not charged following the incident with witnesses and video of the event. liberal cities are now prosecution under mob justice, not real justice. that's as dangerous as it gets as laws are not blind but will follow new guidelines under strict political pressure. there will be applied pressure for a guilty verdict as well. 43 arrests and a man with clear mental violent issues is allowed back into society to become everyone elses problem which is eventually going to have these situation. liberals litterally want criminals to have free reign. its insanity. i see myself becoming heartless to murder victims as they most likely voted for this but unfortunately i live in this state so i cant just watch the implosion of these places from afar. the fact ANYONE has a argument to the contrary has a direct effect on my friends and family safety.
-
3
-
-
42 minutes ago, LeviF said:
Anarcho-tyranny in a nutshell.2 hours ago, LeviF said:i like this one. i been threatened and masturbated at. la dee da excuse me where is the nearest bathroom at? i ran into shawn on the train again and he told me he going to kill me and made a mess on my stuff again. i told him can you at least wait till friday? its been a long week and its only tuesday tee hee. that guy is such a silly goose.
how many people out there will never be able to write a idiotic tweet like this because they were wrong. just acceptable normalized behavior for leftist. its sad that the next video i see of someone being beaten or victimized or murdered in a democrat stronghold. i will stop and wonder if they had the same mentality. just continued training for society to sit back and ignore it all even if its happening right before your eyes. a beautiful utopia of threats and human fluids for these folks to enjoy.
-
1
-
-
17 hours ago, SCBills said:
Activists blocking subway trains now.
Good times. I’m sure all the passengers trying to get to and from work, and stuck in the tunnels, are happy to sacrifice their day for performative clout chasers.
people getting pushed in front of trains by criminally insane. meh.
people getting attacked raped murdered. yawn
people tired of it standing up for themselves. WE MUST STAND UP TO THE VIOLENCE!!!!
-
1
-
1
-
-
3 hours ago, Roundybout said:
And there it is! Mask off, everyone!
as opposed to ignoring a relevant issue that needs addressing as it involves the loss of innocent lives. only because it makes you uncomfortable.
keep the "mask on". it will work itself out eventually.
-
1
-
-
On 5/5/2023 at 3:28 PM, Roundybout said:
I am for strategies that give aid and assistance to people who do not have the agency to make decisions for themselves, yes.
where are these "strategies" at? as the criminally insane are more rampant all people hear is more money. more programs. i want, i would. you can be for whatever you want but what is going to protect a person today? while we wait for the lefts perfect hindsight solutions to every problem. problems that are prevalent in areas they have fully controlled for decades. the main difference is people do not have a right to defend themselves. the solution isn't around any corner but seem to stream out of people that never lift a finger to do anything about it themselves but are quick to judge people that do. sit and patiently wait and hopefully the outcome is not severe enough that you can mount a defense after damage is done. even then you may be prosecuted.
On 5/5/2023 at 3:28 PM, Roundybout said:and also strategies where Mr. Vigilante doesn’t strangle people to death because he felt “uncomfortable.”
Seethe and cope, rightoidsim sure the old lady "felt uncomfortable" right before she got her orbital socket broken by that guy. you would have stood there and watched while delivering a prophecy of what should be done to stop this as that lady puts her face back together.
you act as if these people deserve or intended to become violent that day. 3 people felt "uncomfortable" enough to wrestle and hold him down. 3! many more called the police while confined in a moving tin can with no escape. police, mental health officers NOONE that could make it on a moving train regardless. next time a story comes out where violence happened and there were threats and unhinged behavior right before it remember that cowards like yourself exist. i hope the father of your wife or gf understands your stance that standing up for others, even if it results in violence is the states problem and not yours.
-
1 hour ago, T master said:
Well check the numbers of 3 years ago to what they are now at least he slowed it even if there is was any truth to what you say the numbers have over quadrupled in 3 years !!
Come on man knock it off ... The numbers say it all & it is a direct result of the over turning the laws that were in place when this POTUS took office & if you think any different your either a liar a fool or both ...
theres nothing but strawmen to grasp on to. dems suddenly do a 180 degree turn on a ideology they deem racist and resort to tactics they spent year condemning when its no longer politically convenient.
not believing a theraputic will save humanity including in children it never even effected is anti science!!!!.....no we always said science is a ever changing discipline. we never demonized anyone and were just suggesting people protect themselves. we were only going off the stats that we did not completely ignore and fight with everything we got to censor. er um dont blame us. there were no other alternatives...from people who weren't far right murders. our hands were tied.
defunding and reimagining police will lead to a better society...we never said that! we just wanted to get rid of the bad apples. we actually want to give police MORE money. here take more money..wait where did they go? anyone want to be police? anyone? theres a guy getting mugged can somebody do somthing??
black lives matter!..no i didnt hear about the 15 murders that happened in my city last weeked. must not have been important. im sure someone is investigating that? did anyone help that victim of mugging yet? he is looking like hes in rough shape.
undocumented people have the human right to live in our free country!!... wait, the country is really big. why are they coming to my part of it? go away i dont have anything to give you. can we get some guys with horses to patrol and stop them or maybe a tall structure of some sort? speaking of guys on horses ..where did they all go? are still mad at that!? tell em we will give them more money. anyone want to be a racist on a horse?
on and on. they write a sentance or two online in support. move on to the next topic after reality sets in. then its "i was never for that"
coming soon to a liberal near you.
isnt it amazing we have so many courageous non cis competitors as champions in our society!i could of sworn women got that opportunity too. we should really get them their own league. womens rights!!
why are all these adults complaining about not being able to have kids and depressed about adults pushing them into irreversible things? they were only gay or confused. well talk about ungrateful. if it wasnt for us they would have had to have fully developed minds and actual life experiences before being who we think they truley are. besides, i stoped fighting for that like 8 years ago. im on to the new suffrage of people who cut themselves having rooms dedicated to that where they can do it without judgment with clean tools provided by at medical centers. sound insane? i agree but wouldn't put it past this ideology at this point. prob already exists.
lets not give a pass to the right. keep on this complete anti abortion anti contraception insanity and the future will be just as full of horror stories of kids who are unwanted and abused that you dont want to help pay taxes for. them kids need some bootstraps? not my problem. where is there mother at?
it seems since republicans are more concerned about kids paying the bills they accrued in college then they are in dismantling the corrupt system that college is built. i guess because the libs endorse it then screw the generations of kids that got swept into it trying to get a career. f em. entire generations that are caught in indentured servitude is going to be great for our countries future. thirty years ago i paid off my 5k 4 year degree whats there problem. it aint me so who cares. the same people who think children should not make commitments to gender think they should be locked into decisions that promise good paying careers? leftists all about fair share as colleges sit on multi million endowments and rising? just pay off a particular generation, screw actual reform? there's common ground here.
just alot of destruction in the future in general but i simply see the left as the main driving force of most of it currently.
-
1
-
1
-
-
24 minutes ago, In Summary said:
....thus the thought of what DTs you put in front of them matters.
i agree. that is a major part. if our dts diminate then the smaller faster lbs is actually a good scheme. unfortunately after this year we have noone under contract. is oliver worth a huge contract? daquan still want to stay? phillips stay healthy a season. last year of the big boys and next is when the rookie lbs will have to step up. not a good combo for the future right now.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, MrEpsYtown said:
Well I didn’t buy the whole Dodson has a chance to start deal. Now I kind of have to. He’s only 24 years old about to turn 25, been in the system 4 years now. He has good size and athleticism. He has hung around this long because McDermott loves him. Remember that he served a suspension coming into the league. There were red flags…yet the Bills held on to him, stood by him, and he worked to stay. If I am a betting type man, I would say it’s his job to lose. I feel like McDermott maybe wants to give Dodson a real shot at this.
However, I do think Baylon Spector is going to give him a run for his money. He has instincts and athleticism. He is a few pounds lighter but more athletic. Spector is also 24 going on 25. So there isn’t any advantage there. Dodson has all that experience over Spector. What Spector was lacking in was functional strength and if he got after it this offseason, he truly has a shot. I just keep going back to how good he looked in preseason and he was a difference maker playing at a high level at Clemson. One other thing is that he played in the 4-2-5 as a stacked backer at Clemson, which essentially what the mike is asked to do here…though he spent most of his time as a will, I think he can play the mike.
To me Bernard isn’t in this thing. He’s smaller than these guys, and I just didn’t see anything last year that told me he could step in and be a starter this year at mike. He also played in that 3-4 type front at Baylor so the job and run fits are quite different. I think he is still two years away and in my mind, Dorian Williams is already better. I dunno.
To me Klein is the vet you have around as insurance if this all goes FUBAR, but I am not sure he is a truly a starter anymore.
I like Dorian Williams and I think he can play mike. He played it for 3 years at Tulane. I think Beane’s apprehension about playing him inside is that he likely feels Williams will not be able to step in and be the green dot guy right away. IMO the only guy in this draft who could have done that was Campbell. Williams is only 21 goin on 22 and started at Tulane for 3 years. He is likely not ready but the upside is there. If I recall, McBean were super apprehensive about Tremaine being the guy calling the defense as a rookie. They had their doubts and said some of the same things they are saying about Williams now, but Tremaine picked it up quick. I could see the same thing happening here.
So to me it is Dodson vs Spector (if he got stronger) with an outside chance Williams blows them both out of the water.
good insight i really didnt think dodson was in any contention because they choose klien in edmonds absence. or was dodson on suspension during that time? he def has somthing the front office likes but i agree with the Spector analysis. it always seems strange to me when guys seem like great players in preseason then fall off the map. the argument is "well they are playing guys that will be flipping burgers". no. they are playing against the the competition they are given and excelling. they cant demand to be first string so this is all that can be assessed. the coaches obviously see more in practice but how can anything definitive be said about how they do against better players if not given the legitamate opportunity. i really like Spector and hope i can see what he's got against starting caliber players.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, HOUSE said:
Linebackers are over rated
when you only keep 2 on the field all the time and they are the top tacklers of the team every year you better make sure you value the position properly.
shawn had a decent one in carolina that had a big part in getting him to a sb and landing him a head coaching job. hopefully he knows they are at least average rated. 😁
-
55 minutes ago, jaybills said:
Edmunds was not that great. All he did was cover range side to side. Couldn't shed a block to save his life, never sacked anyone, and I don't remember him making game changing plays too often. #Replaceable.
id say in Edmunds defense alot of what he gave noone could notice because it never happened. his monster size and speed meant if he was anywhere close to a reciever the qb was hesitant to take a chance on that target, triple pat the ball and possably why a lineman got the sack dump pass. his height and wingspan also meant he could cover guys behind him if the qb didnt put touch on passes. i agree with everything you said when it comes to his trench play/ physicality but i also give the guy credit for the problems he created to offensive coordinators. gameplaning any intermediate routes in the middle were a problem. if the league recognized only impact plays and stats there would be no reason he was highly sought after and given a rediculous contract he got. our D saw a sharp dropoff when he was out. i hope McDermott has a better plan then putting in the guys we already had during that time. scheme change? a gem in FA after cuts? somthing more then undersized rookie lb commanding the D.
-
6 minutes ago, harmonkillebrew said:
This is my concern. There were times that I felt our base nickel was exploited by run-first teams. That will be NE and NYJ, but even Cincy showed they could dominate us in the trenches. Now we're subbing out Edmunds for .... Dorian? Klein? Spector?? We are going to get gashed week in and week out. UNLESS, we alter schemes slightly and play more 3 LBs and/or more blocker-eating DT/DE play (which means less Oliver and more 1-tech DTs and 5-tech DEs, which we don't really have the personnel for).
The strategy isn't clear to me.
3 minutes ago, Orlando Tim said:I think our biggest signing before the year starts will be another DaQuan Jones type player who can eat up blocks and then we use our LBs just to fly around. If we do that teams will have to run to the outsides mainly and our team speed will hopefully negate any offensive advantage
this could be what they are thinking. i say Edmunds worse trait was going down hill so maybe we are not going to see a huge drop off besides the numerous tipped passes he had. he wasnt very good at blitzing either. covering alot of grass in zone and his sideline to sideline speed, along with size was what we got. both our rookie lbs can play that role but like noteed. the AFC has a really good run attack and running up the gut, getting a lineman to the second level will be a good SAFE recipe to move the chains if we are rolling with these guys as starters.
-
i said this as well. our team is in a division with pretty good run attacks and these small fast lbs dont seem like good stick your face in the line stack and shed players. maybe its to dare them to keep the ball out of rogers, hill hands. the jets played us close with their #1 rb injured. NE has always had a good running attack and won a game strictly running. miami played us close every game and had career days against our D and we seem to be all about pass support with smaller fast guys.
i think the gameplan in the AFC will be run the ball down the bills throats to eat up clock and hope josh reverts to his old gunslinger all or nothing old self that can force mistakes and turnovers.
klein is better run stuffer so we will see but the future looks to be pass specific D. especially if we are sticking to our nickle base roots. hopefully our new TE and line negate josh's reliance to put it all on his shoulders
-
1
-
1
-
-
4 hours ago, BillStime said:
And crickets from the simps
i have a feeling this is deeper then the puddles you constantly leave that smell like. anyways, its what happens when you post so much garbage and absolutely refuse to acknowledge when you are wrong. is this just another quick take or propaganda that will change in 5 min? who knows! why would this be different?
obviously we have a constitution and first ammendment that everyone including the gov is supposed to uphold. does turkey and india share this?
is there anything in the turkey user agreement that states what happened is against there countries very foundation? you do know everywhere is not here, right? if twitters user agreement in the US transparently mentioned shadow bans and gov censorship without cause or notice and the multitude of other issues. guess what? nobody could say much. all that private company make your own for decades by the liberals is actually a sound statement.
i def will read into this more and oppose it and elon if true because i do not flip my beliefs based on political factors. they just are what they are.
finally. you sure seem to have alot of resentment for something you absolutely rely on in every single post you cut and paste. you obviously are fine with any story in this thread and are a big finacial supporter of Elon and his platform with your very existence here. pretty typical leftist behavior to condemn something that you also support. did you also buy the checkmark from the guy you hate? lifetime subscription? lol.
-
1
-
-
On 4/16/2023 at 11:41 PM, Andy1 said:
No link…yet. Just wait.
Isnt that the logical conclusion to all of it though?
If aborting an embryo at 7 weeks in a state with a 6 week ban is the taking of a human life, there must be some consequences for the woman who voluntarily killed the person/embryo. To not charge/punish the woman would not be protecting the unborn. That’s not being tough on crime.
First it was overturn Roe to allow each state to determine their laws. Now a conservative judge wants to remove medical abortions nation wide. Surely politicians catering to the religious right want a nationwide ban. Some prosecutor, judge, legislature, politician will always want to be further right than those who came before him/her.serious question that may be a dilemma. many men accidentally get women pregnant. can a man assault a woman to cause a miscarriage and get no charges related to the outcome of the child? so only assault charges can be made because he did not kill anything that is considered alive. does this put many women in jeopardy because there are alot of POS out there that look at assault time will be less then 18+ years of responsibility?
i ask this because i think the extremes used to take control of the conversation only but have been more routinely making laws. that and rarely is the left forced to view their ideas through a different lens.
the exact way liberals feel about womens lives at this time is the way pro lifers feel about unborn children for decades. i think the left went from safe and rare into another realm that is dark and now the right is doing the same. the sad part is i think both have valid points and are done from a standpoint of empathy..for the most part but they only consider evil intentions. regardless how you feel your ethics will be challenged and it WILL become hypocritical at some point unless clear lines are drawn. nobody seems to want to do that.
you say surely the right wants to prosecute women for murder. thats the logical conclusion. those same people have sat there and watched fully formed unequivocal human life be debated for termination simply because it did not leave the mother. until day of birth abortion is the logical conclusion to refusing life exists inside the womb. things are going to go to their conclusions in a polar way unless people call out their own side and stop only vilifying the other.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Success said:
When did NE beat us?
The wind game?
yeah i think. i was working. i think they threw it 2 times that game but brings up the point we need a D that can stuff the run because sometimes that's all either team can do in OUR weather. bengals had a good rushing attack in the playoff game we just lost as well.
maybe we are sitting this rook with AJ but beyond this year alot of small speed lbs we are stacking for the future.
-
ne beat us with nothing but running attack. hall seems to be a stud that we didnt face due to injury and miami rb had his best game against us last year.
speed is great but i hope the guy can stack and shed as well or josh and the new new tight end we just got arent going to see the field much. opponents are going to grind out the clock and see if josh can play a mistake free game.
-
2 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:
WTF are you talking about? Are you high?lol. yeah im drinking a couple cases of bud light. i think they are putting liquor in them and calling them beer.
jesus relax. im just killing time during the draft and i guess i am also watching you spaz for a joke that @ you.
didnt know members were inflicting so much trauma putting your name in posts. 😳
-
1
-
-
On 2/6/2023 at 7:53 AM, leh-nerd skin-erd said:
Sometimes, when I think something is funny, I throw it out there. Sometimes it’s not. To be candid, having communicated with you in the past, I’m surprised at your reaction to my post. That’s on me though, and I apologize for that.
As to your question, I don’t know everyone in the world, so it’s impossible for me to answer.
you can @ me dude. i wont get all menstrual like @ChiGoose
On 2/6/2023 at 10:48 AM, ChiGoose said:
Hey, I know you can’t read, but I promised it if the Jan 6 committee didn’t release the transcripts. You threw out a bunch of other conditions that I never agreed to and now are trying to dunk on me because you are incapable of understanding basic reality.
Sorry, buddy. Maybe sign up for some 1st grade English classes if you’re still struggling with this.
your up to 3 solicitors chi and growing. you should start a subscription service and profit off your board celebrity status. bags mugs. of coarse as soon as you make a good profit we take it back and redistribute it amongst all our members. just the way you communists would want. 😁
-
1
-
-
10 minutes ago, Snakeoiler996 said:
23 jump pass twister. Josh hands off to cook. Cook takes the ball but stops and jumps in the air while doing a 360 spin, then throws the ball over the line to a waiting kincaid in the endzone
works best in goalline. Works every time
you are welcome
that is absurdity!
everyone knows that play only works if the player spins clockwise. cook is right handed! now we need to use capital to move up to get the personel to run it which will def cost our next 5 picks.
you just destroyed the team for the next decade.
-
41 minutes ago, Doc said:
They moved a little and then went back to their original places.
do to the shakey foundation built by companies who got exclusive gov contracts.
-
42 minutes ago, JoPoy88 said:
I get those wants and needs absolutely. One of things you need to realize at mlb though is: they haven’t given up on Bernard, even if a lot of us have forgotten about him since he didn’t play. They have their bets on him hedged with bringing back dodson and klein but I think they think Bernard has a real chance to develop into something. They will absolutely give him a chance and I wouldn’t expect an early rd (day 2) pick for LB.
More offensive line help? Absolutely throw it on me. They can take 3 OLs in a row if the value’s there go ahead.
really? bernard was a absolute shock to me. i thought he would devolop into a hybrid cb/lb for nickle pass downs as a third taking out maybe poyer as dumb as that sounds as i write it. a disrupter, not a lynchpin. maybe a Kelsey killer to man up with more size. never saw him as a full time starter. hey if he develops into more then a wrench to toss into packages thats great but for some reason he seems like a absolute liability in any run and def not a full time lb in our nickle only. i cant believe we didnt reach to get the best one in the draft in the first. not that i want that at all but seeing as mcd had luke to cement his career and they seemed so intrigued with Edmunds becoming that guy with ridiculous traits. i will be suprised if they let mlb in a primary nickle not be a stud out the gate. meaning rd 2 maybe another trade up just to do it. again, not that i advocate that. we still need competition upgrades for the o line. esp right tackle.
-
24 minutes ago, gonzo1105 said:
No not at all. Dorsey played in a 12 personnel system in college. Knox will be the in line Y TE now which makes sense because he’s a better blocker and Kincaid will be used in a lot of different ways. Inline(not a lot), in the slot, as an Hback and he’s an athletic nightmare for teams.
The Bills now can dictate to teams how they’re prepared for. The Bills were an easy study because they ran 11 personnel the highest in the league. Now it forces teams to prep for more packages which isn’t easy when you have Josh Allen at QB.
The Bills already stretch teams vertically as we all know but what this also helps is now it allows to stretch defenses horizontally and vertically and that makes them very very hard to defend. It’s why I love 12 personnel in general and this pick.
ok i think thats why im hesitant. we seemed locked into 11 and never seemed to get creative and by the halfway point we stalled out and had to bring back beasley just because dorsey needed a specific slot guy and could not get creative with pretty talented roster.
im still down on dorsey. we seemed really excited for gilliams athleticism. not on the field much. both our our rb pass catch ability. rare. knox upside enough to give a nice contract. spotty production. invisible in games. im a huge fan of shakir and dorsey issues getting him involved.
dorsey seemed to just go 4 guys in very specific roles, besides digs in slot because hes a athletic freak. so the rich getting richer when you cant use what you got has me skeptical. that and this teams absolute refusal to play rookies in the first place. now we get one in a position we are not weak. it really makes me nervous.
i hope it works out the way you say instead of how it has actually been but thanks for the insight. i really think we should trade knox as much as that pains me. i just dont think his production will be worth the hefty contract now. hope im wrong but thanks for the info and optimism. i need it lol
-
3
-
-
50 minutes ago, gonzo1105 said:
I just wanna say screw everyone that mocked me for mocking Dalton Kincaid and laughed at it. He is an A++ pick for the Bills and a better prospect than Flowers, Addison, Johnston. Halfway through the year everyone is going to be glad we picked him
wow good job. im warming up to it after watching film. this is def BPA. does this put knox on the bench more or is kincaid our #3 full time slot?
im not mad at the pick if i had more confidence in dorsey. im not a fan of how he uses weopons and kincaid/knox combo i feel one is going to end up contributing nothing. if its knox that's alot of cap in the trash. dorsey just seems like he needs a vanilla offense with really good players at concrete positions. not alot of interesting shifts of roles happening in which i think both guys can eat.
-
i like this very much.
-
1
-
1
-
2
-
Combating imaginary racism with actual racism??
in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Posted
the problem is the people he is highlighting see the color of peoples skin as the superior characteristic of who they are as a person without understanding why that is universally wrong.