Buffarukus
-
Posts
1,342 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Buffarukus
-
-
12 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:
Are you in support of the government telling us what is and isn’t appropriate to read under penalty of a criminal charge?i think thats called the fcc. r rated movies should not be in the kids section. you agree?
now your doing what i said. trying to defend somthing we as adults should agree on and not need gov involvement. are we debating a "myth"?
here is NOT two penguins
-
1 minute ago, ChiGoose said:
Is it inappropriate for schools to have books about gay couples? Or slavery? Or minorities?depends on the context and age of child. most of those books are called history books and i think your trying to again ferret out the craziest examples.
at the end of the day if two peguins gets washed out with a book on oral sex thats fine with me. it shouldnt be that hard to keep appropriate books on a library shelf yet youll claim the left is defending gay penguins the right will claim oral sex. both are going on.
other topics?
-
1 minute ago, ChiGoose said:
Do you believe “And Tango Makes Three” is an inappropriate book?Do you believe that when kids hear a story about two male penguins adopting a baby penguin, they think of sex?
no. not at all but your using the lowest common denominator. many parents were reading material they found in their kids library that the board said was inappropriate for the adults at the meeting. so i think we both have to admit that we dont know whats at every district and use the most innocent examples isnt being honest.
as for the other topics?
-
1
-
-
3 hours ago, ChiGoose said:
For like the zillionth time, genital surgery on minors goes against the medical guidelines. Surgery on minors is extremely rare and if it is done, it’s generally top surgery performed after years of gender affirming care.
Do you guys care at all that you’re being lied to? When you hear these outrageous claims that liberals are trying to chop up kids genitals, doesn’t it seem ludicrous? Do you ever think to look up what the actual medical guidelines are?
Bad faith actors are trying to boil down the entire range of different forms of gender affirming care into surgery and then lying about it. You’re being fooled and playing right into their hands.
In general, what liberals want for trans kids is that they get age-appropriate medical community approved care from medical professionals with informed consent and parental support. That’s it. This BS about genital surgery is coming from people who seem to be incapable of not thinking about kids’ junk.
i dunno chi. for something that is logical and all in the rights head the left sure seems to be very adversarial on the topic and when you coincide it with the protests to KEEP age inappropriate books on shelves for minors. demand drag queens read to toddlers. protest and condemn a bill that eliminates sexual/gender subjects in GRADES 3 and less. you have a pretty sick trend of children and gender sex that the left is on.
its really easy to publically say this is not happening its all in the rights head but if it is we fully agree and condemn it as well.
the left seems to not know that kids grow up. suprisingly when they do. noone has issue with them learning or dancing with drag queens or whatever.
so myth or not who is really taking the very demented side on these issues? the ones "making them up" or the ones advocating the myth keeps happening?
-
1
-
1
-
-
19 hours ago, SCBills said:
Why is it Democrats and MSNBC Liberals have such an issue with any liberal journalist that doesn’t follow their status quo?
It’s nonstop now…
Matt Taibbi
Bari Weiss
Michael Schellenberger
Aaron Mate
Jimmy Dore
Glenn Greenwald
Do you ever stop to wonder why you’re now the party of ex-Intel officials and the Bush Administration? How did that flip occur? Some true progressives actually have the guts to call it out.
well when your buisness model is to put out state sanctioned propaganda.
its really convienent to find breaking stories with "sources close to the gov" when the building is employing them. "investigative reporting" is walking over to the water cooler to talk to them. 😁
-
2
-
-
Just now, redtail hawk said:
hmmm...when did he win those awards and from what publication?
was that enough info to answer the question of why one guy has earned more trust on the subject or am i really suppose to fill you in on matts life work?
your turn.
-
1
-
-
16 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:
why are you so eager to believe Taibbi and not this other dude? Did he switch from a conservative mag to a liberal, the opposite of Taibbi? You guys are so damned biased in your sources. Do you ever actually consider credible info from an "opposing" source?
ill take a multi award winning journalist who entire career has shown a neutral political stance and testified under oath his findings on twitter
yourself?
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
-
55 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:
Banning Tik Toc would be a backdoor precident for The State to ban other sites they deem "dangerous" in the future.
so if the taliban put out a recruitment app would it be the same. the issue is a adversary having the ability to data collect and promote propaganda. seeing the sheer amount of american media china censors or does not allow they seem to do what they want
again what was the banning of parler and shutdown of its servers under false pretenses made by the gov? same? different? how?
1 hour ago, SUNY_amherst said:I think parler just sucked so it didn't survive on its own. They need users to survive
you need to read into it. it was a state sponsored shutdown based on jan 6th lies. im sure many who dont know or care about tik tock will think the same.
-
2
-
-
1 hour ago, SUNY_amherst said:
The Snowden affair showed us that the other social media offerings have a back door for the government. Tik Tok does not and that's the only reason why they want to ban it. The rest is all just BS
Tik Tok employs 7,000 Americans by the way, not to mention all the supporting business they bring to their American content creators. Banning it would be some bullsh*t
we get it. you want us to follow you on the platform.
1 hour ago, SUNY_amherst said:I love capitalism. Banning Tik Tok would be a move reminiscent of communism
what was the unilateral shut down of parler and its servers then based on lies? seemed alot of leftist cheering for communism...as long as they don't like it.
-
9 minutes ago, SUNY_amherst said:
Jim Jordan should worry about his pedo wrestling program a little more than some emails
you should send him a email and let him know 😉
8 minutes ago, Kemp said:Of coarse.
Let's see what they come up with.
Meanwhile, yet to hear that Trump isn't guilty of the charges he's facing and will be facing.
Will Gym Jordan be presiding over the raping of boys during the festivities since he's in that photo?you wanted info. i gave it. why are you asking questions so quickly when the taibbi hearing is two hours? its like your not even watching it? that cant be. did i waste my time here and now you go to a whatabouting to a different subject?
2 in row who rely on attacking the messager while ignoring the info presented. is that a trend?
-
2 minutes ago, Kemp said:
Which emails and what did they say? Which communication?
hello how are you this evening? i see you looking at the menu for information. have a seat.
for your first coarse.
irs payed him a visit to his home morning of as well. just to get info on his W2. not intimidate. 😁. enjoy.
2 minutes ago, Kemp said:
If that's your stance, why haven't Republicans gone after them and presented proof?here you go. goose gander? can of worms? please wait while the chef prepares.
At least two Republican DAs want to prosecute Bidens - New York Post https://nypost.com/2023/04/05/at-least-2-gop-das-want-to-prosecute-bidens-after-trump-arrest-comer/amp/
anything else sir? more drinks? bread? call me if you need me.
-
57 minutes ago, L Ron Burgundy said:
You seem fired up. Calm down. Have a beer or 3.
You say you want to bridge the gap but you got fired up without me even trying. Bill might make you have a heart attack. Get out and meet some normal liberals. Those of us that know there's one sex. That don't want to defend the police. You'll learn a lot I promise.
I know this is coming off as condescending. It's not on purpose. Might be my writing style or that I'm inherently a diick. At last I know right?
well thats a start. unfortunately the "fringe" has reached the highest point of the party. ask the president how many genders there are. where are the liberals standing up for womens rights. i dont see them? where is the mass expulsion of DAs that are letting criminals walk and disenfrachising police to even make a useless arrest. silently talking amongst yourselves is not going to change much and gives power to the fringe to speak on your behalf.
im not seeing it. in the meantime some psychotic bills are being presented. men in wo.ens prisons. no mandatory time for anything less then murder?
your party no longer represents you and if you publicly say what you just did you are now "far right"...welcome to regular human logic.
ill shut up and stay out of it.
-
1
-
-
8 hours ago, HamSandwhich said:
They’ll just see these things as weak because it doesn’t fit into their agenda. When leftists say Republicans don’t stand for anything they are actually saying Republicans are just not agreeing with what they are trying to get done. Just dumb.
yeah he didnt see anything you had to say as concrete so i gave a list. as usual it was dismissed. not really dems fault. nothing could be done. whatabout. too long, rambly nonsense.
its typical. its been a waste of time, everytime. but i keep trying for some odd reason.
-
1
-
-
6 hours ago, Big Blitz said:
Liberals here sounding more and more guilt ridden over Covid and inflation - they’ll never admit it.
I’ve never seen them collectively (it’s only 3 posters to like the rest quit life) this stupid. And that’s saying something.
i mean how big is ego. literally were a moment away from rounding people up and putting them in camps. calling people terrorists for ACTUAL peaceful protests for honest real scientific data. cheering on the police (they just persecuted) for closing down a buisness that were forced to close for no logical scientific reason. checkpoints in NY. trackable I.Ds.
and for MOST the time records show the people in power knew the entire time. still "who knew" "mistakes were made" "everyone acted like idiots so its ok we applied idiotcy".
you think there be a bit of reflection. the best ive seen is accounts who pushed the hardest no longer active. prob changed names but its a sign they know..and hopefully learned. as for the rest it was just a act of god which for them is basically true. no alternatives were ever brought up.
-
2
-
-
7 hours ago, L Ron Burgundy said:
Listen, I tried. Your answer, and buffarukus' typical rambling nonsense, shows to me not that your not knowledgeable or serious.
Honoring police is part of your platform? Having a police presence? Where? How you wanna do that?
Inflation is a world wide problem. Covid f'd other countries worse than us and we trade with them. It would be a problem if an R got elected too.
I expected a better answer I guess. I was hoping for more Ben Shapiro but what you gave was Hannity if that makes sense. I liked your initial thought.
so pluck out covid, and from that pluck out inflation singularly. dont address what i said and just say its ok cause the world is dealing with it. imagine the country that stayed open. kids who did not lose years of school. buisnesses stayed open not closed forever. trust in our health institutions and gov and media that actually told the truth and was not in the pocket of big pharma. no need for billions/trillions in checks to people forced to stay home. neighbors that were not calling each other murders for living normal lives. better or worse?
anyways all the rest is just nonsensical ramblings of dem policy failures that is making this country far worse for its citizens. but should be kept in a sentance or two for easy digestion.
it would be nice if a liberal said hey i recognize these failures and will fight against them because they are hurting people. its not that hard. nope all figments of the rights imagination..january 6th!...which i can easily acknowledge was wrong. racism? detest it. corporate shills trickle down bs? illegal abortion across the board. nope on record here. not even a trump fan but see his appeal. opps this is getting long aka a ramble.
thanks for trying ron.
-
1
-
-
8 hours ago, L Ron Burgundy said:
Ok let's say that's accurate. Is it more so than the far rights influence?
I dont see how that's even arguable. Rarely is policy even discussed by the right. Most of what I see is Hunter Biden plus what is a male. So consumed by admittedly stupid shiite that nothing meaningful is even discussed.
what you see? what are you looking at around you? there are meaningful things the right are fighting against every day.
we are in a proxy war with a nuclear power. there has been no peace talks and only further escalation by the US. all while china becomes the beacon of peace suddenly in the world? while talks of dumping the dollar take place among major economies? when bread cost 100 dollars cause its worthless im guessing then and only then will the virtue signaling fade real quick to secure what you need to survive. it will be f everyone else on a major scale. including under represented groups. that may or may not be hyperbole. its never been so close to real. one wrong target hit in nato and you might be in a trench next month.
people are being murdered by violent offenders that were released after being caught by liberals new soft on crime initiatives. robberies. looting. you name it up. this is unexplainable to anyone who lives a honest hard working life why dems refuse to address this. sure it may be getting slightly filtered out in elections but id expect enough victims have been piled up to do a complete 180 and demand serious change..nope. still charging people for defending themselves. still letting criminals in a turn style. still having MAJOR ISSUES hiring police and military which effects everyone when it comes to response when needed. you dont care until you need them.
excusing the weoponization of gov. twitter. massive data collection. multiple journalists doors kicked in. irs going after whistle blowers. now bs charges against former presidents? even lib outlets saying charges are a joke. not a peep from the left. all excused. its only getting more brash and escalating. completly numb that alot of this is unprecedented. i remember when trumps "fake news" comment was a "attack on journalism!!! fascism!!". but actual dept deployed applying pressure on citizens..yawn.
inflation is crushing families started by the incorrect covid response. a response that was punished if fought against. a response by rep that was villianized and censored for years. but..who couldve known is what they say. as more is looked into. EVERYONE knew very well and mobilized fools based on fear against their neighbors. oldest trick still works.
just a start. reversing any of this would be a decent policy. all things that greatly effect your and my life. nothing culture war or fringe going on. if you think this country is better then it was before this administration started. your either rich or blind. seriously give me somthing this administration has done to make your life better beside trillion dollar bills that they say will do great things for me in 20 years when everyone has forgotten how our debt tripled in a few years lol. id love a bit on encouragement as i check to make sure my bank still hasn't collapsed.
is this all a figment of my imagination? my cult has warped my mind and none of it is real? thats the way leftists keep insinuating reality is.
8 hours ago, L Ron Burgundy said:I mentioned candidates losing elections if they don't claim Biden/dems stole the election. That's insane. They have to ride a conspiracy with ZERO proof to even be considered in many places? Come on.
you don't see the true difference between rep and dems followers. one has a major distrust of gov and one fully supports it. the reason there was/is so much election mistrust was covid had a bunch of states change voting laws and suddenly people had to wait weeks to get a clear picture or listen to how ballots could be removed from signatures and not double checked on and on with strange NEW policies..for our saftey of coarse. that dems never reversed. that's not normal and just because a law was changed last minute making it legal does not mean there couldn't be manipulation of it or if deeply looked at as a loophole for fraud. im not saying that is true. biden getting the most votes in history is a pretty good signal somthing was off here. biden, who hid in his basment and did not campaign much? if you say so. i honestly dont know enough about the sheer amount of changes to be convinced but it certainly smells funky. but liberals certainly had no issue jumping on the jim crow 2.0 hysteria when Republicans made changes. most moderate. BUT I.D. NOOOO!!!! they are stealing elections!!! so any argument on absurdity of reaction is pretty tone deaf.
-
1 hour ago, ExiledInIllinois said:
Not everyone...
Sheesh... Where do I begin:
"...You can get just so much from a good thing
You can linger too long in your dreams
Say goodbye to the oldies but goodies
'Cause the good ole days weren't always good
And tomorrow ain't as bad as it seems..."ummm ok. well thats a very bleak way to watch the history channel. lol. tesla invented the AC transmission and transformer which revolutionized life as we know it. "not for everyone! people in poverty were forced to use candles! cant believe they put that man on a pedistool when there was suffering going on"
is that how it goes? you look for the bad and think nothing good should be brought up if it existed? you see flags and patriotism and think its secretly a dedication to fascist dictators? you use the most biased viewpoint.a description by a political rival that lost a election as some sort of fact? yikes. btw dont use hillary quotes in public the left can barely stand her.
you want to know about the genocidal roots of identity politics that the dems are embracing? millions with a M. oh and that racism segragation that comes with it.
how about the rich long history of censorship and governments who consolidate power under the guise of saftey as our recent history had with democrats? i hope you didnt gloss over that nazi tactic while researching republican fascism. did you know dems in ny still wont reinstate fired med workers as the state faces shortages causing patients with serious issues waiting time for available help?
history is interesting when you read it through a politically biased viewpoint filled with modern day "dog whistles" that anyone can make up on the fly. "what you really mean is"
anyways. if you ever want to answer my questions directly. i think it would be a good read.
-
17 minutes ago, ExiledInIllinois said:
"America First"... The Firsters is straight out of the 1930s... They are the Charles Lindberghs, Henry Fords, and Joe Kennedy's that wanted to align and appease Hitler and the fascists. The fascists are the Putin's and Xi's today hybridized 30 years strong from old communists...
I mean knock Hillary all you want, she was right 10 years ago when she said the GOP all they want to do is roll the clock back to 1929 for a conservative "do-over."
what is your difference between patriotism and fascism because liberals seem to equate the two so much that they hate the american flag.
i think everyone wants to role the clock back to a country that manufactured the things they used. college was not a necessity. good paying jobs were plentiful and homes were affordable. one person could work while the other could care for the family.
same question i guess. how can people convey they want that success that we once had. that afforded people what was once known as the american dream without lunatics shoving the idea that it means people want racism jim crow and every other negative as the goal? how does one do that?
make america great again and not racist like the libs are talking about we want american prosperity for all so everyone has the freedom and opportunity this country stands for.
its kinda long and im sure STILL not good enough to dismantle into some "dog whistle" dillusion.
-
2 hours ago, daz28 said:
I think there's a point you guys are missing. They could have just went out, and arrested Trump, without saying a word. Doing it this way is actually doing him a solid.
im not sure on that
this country has never had a party corrupt enough to actually persecute a political rival, let alone former president, on some inflated decade old charges that american citizens seriously dont give a $#[t about, right as he is beginning his campaign. this is new low imo. but thats what you get when garbage circles the toilet. it gets lower and lower. guy is what 75 the entire american democrat judicial apparatus and these are what they found? on satan in human form? lol.
but hey im all for it. dont do solids. drag the guy into a car after tasing him. f it. the visuals will help people understand how close this is to a 3rd world $#it hole sham democracy? now that the line is crossed its just going to go the other way. rep gunna find some tax bs or dwi from college keep it in there pocket with a friendly judge in a district a jury will never be impartial and pull the trigger when the "enemies" front runner has momentum.
then liberals are going to lose their damn minds about the sanctity of elections or whatever bs makes the situation different from the one they are perfectly fine justifying at this very moment. rinse and repeat then escalate to the next portion of this reality show.
its all good. maybe it will put alot of these criminals in cages finally. maybe people will see how far weve gone and start reversing from a popularity contest to professionalism and integrity one. maybe while Rs and Ds are locking each other up a 3rd party candidate silently walks fist fighting lunatics to grab the microphone and express moderate policies that neither democrat or republican can rally as "their" cause but makes sense to a hell of alot of people in the middle that arent tribalist and just wants their country to succeed.
-
35 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:
I'm wondering when we'll hear about the arrest of the person that leaked the indictment information to The Times. Its a class E felony by NYS law punishable by imprisonment. I'm certain the DA will pursue this leaker as everybody keeps repeating and telling us that "nobody is above the law". Ha, ha.
either that or maybe the fbi kicks in the journalist door guns drawn and handcuffs ready like they did with 2 of them at project veritas. maybe it will be the taibbi treatment and have irs agents pay the the writer a home visit on the morning of explaining the weoponization of government..irony. where then congress can repeatedly grill him/her on who their sources are.
standard procedure for authoritarian gov stuff.
oh wait you said NY times. they will kick in the door to personally present them a pulitzer. lol
-
1 hour ago, ChiGoose said:
A couple of things here.
For one, impeachment is a political process, not a legal one. Nobody can lose their liberty or their rights through impeachment, and politicians may move forward with an impeachment they believe they will lose for political or other reasons.
i realize that. the point im making is charges for impeachment you would like to think would be more air tight then criminal charges seeing as the result is subverting the selection of half the country. so you should prob make the reasoning behind it something that everyone but the most radical on your political opponents side at the very least agree that the charges are worthy of going through with. seeing as the first one was based on a action the former vice president said on video..and was ignored. let alone fully investigated. i know i know. completely different joe biden did nothing wrong and trump claiming wanting answers for it or he would withold aid..completely different as usual. the second one i acctually do agree with but seeing as trump was leaving office a hour after it did seem like a ploy to not have to face him again. well we will see if they have more luck criminally. im sure now that denying elections is now a big deal we will back trace all the politicians who have done it and hold them accountable as well 🙄
1 hour ago, ChiGoose said:This indictment is a legal process. Trump's liberty is at risk and the stakes are higher for him than they were when he faced impeachment. However, unlike a politician, the DA's job often depends on securing convictions. This is why prosecutors often only bring charges they are confident that they can win. The downsides of losing a big case, especially this one, greatly outweigh whatever they may gain from a quixotic indictment with little chance of success.
the DA ran on "getting trump" so this is him fulfilling his campaign promise to his base. that is as political as it gets and i doubt he cares if he wins because he can say i tryed. im sure next election cycle he will dig for new charges from decades ago since the strategy of cleaning up trump crime is more important then boring old city crime to the people of NY. its the gift that can keep on giving.
1 hour ago, ChiGoose said:You also seem to be implying that this is all part of a big liberal plot to get Trump. We can say for certain that nobody is pulling the strings here because if they were, this would not be the first case to have Trump indicted. Both Jack Smith and Fani Willis have much stronger, and more important cases. If there was a great plot afoot here, one of them would have indicted first. The NY grand jury is supposed to go on a month's long break. They never would have held the vote before that break if this was a coordinated effort.
lol are you serious. read above. like i said im glad we finally have standing that politicians will be held accountable for the crimes they commit but lets not act like going after trump is not extremely politically biased and banana republic like. all the crimes by presidents and politicians in general my entire life time and it just so happens that precedent is set on the same guy that had the fbi verifiably lie as being treason. media lie about pee tapes losers and suckers..almost daily come up with ridiculous claims. meantime cuomo murders elderly. sexually assaults. endorses fraud. labtops sit on desks for going on over 4 years without a peep. wars get fought over lies killing thousands of civilians drone striking innocent families as a norm despite any Geneva on the books. insider trading beyond belief. politicians go in poor walk out multi millionaires with no questions. the list is long and includes alot of people and the worst anyone has seen is "resigning in discrace" lol aka going to a resort to live out their days on a money pile.
1 hour ago, ChiGoose said:I know it seems unbelievable to many people here, but could the real reason behind the prosecution simply be that the DA believes he can prove a crime was committed?
read above above. yes it is unbelievable and polls are pretty clear most people are not biased enough to think a new standard of justice for all. your on your own on this one goose. regular unbiased people saw the desperation for a very long time and just going off of the crime they are pursuing..this one may top the list.
-
22 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:
Bringing a charge against the former president of the United States on a case you expect to lose would be a profoundly stupid thing for anyone to do.
Seems incredibly unlikely.
id say the same about impeaching...twice. sending the feds in for "clasified" documents with impending charges to "come soon" and a host of other things that resulted exactly zilch.
so for all the crimes that this demonic criminal has done to our great nation. cheating and paying hush money on decade old charges that USUALLY at most be mistermeanor convictions is the one they got him on a air tight case?
no its just more political fodder to rile up his base..prob hoping for some violence since they finally realize jan 6th is cold stale and news cycle that will declare him a criminal for however many months they drag this on.
good luck. im happy eveeen presidents are not above the law. its a good thought but unfortunately it will prob only be politically biased towards this particular one as all the rest enjoy their retirements in peace and indictment free.
-
37 minutes ago, daz28 said:
If the NY case is basically the same as the federal case, then they've made a massive mistake here. Imagine the defense waltzing in 5 federal prosecutors, with a combined 100 years of experience into the courtroom, introducing them and their credentials to the jury, then asking the simple question of, "why didn't you choose to prosecute these charges?". I can't think of any possible answer they could give other than that they didn't feel that it rose to the level of a crime. Bragg better hope he has EXTREMELY solid evidence and witnesses to overcome what Trump's team is CERTAIN to do.
dont think the point is to get a conviction at all. just a good news cycle who will constantly talk about trump banging a porn star and a media that can now include indictment to the headlines that include impeached and any other key word that is synonymous with law breaking criminal in a headline. (recently indicted) man ties his shoes. takes a walk. just a new little tagline to slant perception win or lose
-
1
-
1
-
-
21 hours ago, redtail hawk said:
So vote for candidates that support your position. Don't intimidate or encourage intimidation of those that disagree (not saying you do but it seems a common sentiment here). Criticize candidates all you want but keep it honest. There are actually facts. Alternative facts= BS. That's how I want it to work. how bout you? As far as other ethnic groups, sure, do an analysis on the impact of each current generation in each group and adjust affirmative action schemes accordingly.
i agree for the most part.
i think one of the reasons for polarization and how many choose political party is the information you talk about and the country no longer has a trusted unbiased media. there are people that regardless how many times are told lies continue to go back and get their info from sources that obviously have agendas that do not include informing the public of factual information. as long as a large portion regurgitates the same lies many people assume it cant be wrong just based on the sheer number confirming them. outlets are actually just copy pasting info from one source that stated it with a simple "person close to the story". anything NOT repeating aka investigating and finding different answers is written off as conspiracy misinformation just because it is giving actual facts but contradicting the majority narrative. there are tons of examples to show this but nothing more obvious then donald trumps presidency. i think that is why there are so many who have nothing but sheer unexplainable hatred for the man. 4+ years of nonstop villianization. yet none i have talked to can ever answer what policy he made that negatively effected them personally. can you name one? can anyone? i agree with his poor character flaws and sure there were moves he made i dont agree with but people act like the man is satan incarnate. most of the issues they see are common among ALL politicians. INCLUDING denying election results.
its why fox is so hated, even tho it is a singular network that gives a alternative view point.. it is biased the same as cnn msnbc and plenty of others. not unusual except it is one network not parroting all the others. agree or disagree i would still want to hear it. what is the opposition saying on topics? oh no its different then the rest? shut them down!! i need homogony in my info.
but whos the threat? why is violence the lefts go to response for multiple college speakers but not right? why is cancel culture so predominate from the left. why after screaming well over 4 years and having the fbi describe republicans as the biggest threat to the country only one large scale political violent event took place. somehow far worse then the exact same riots on capitals on more then one occation. threats that are completely illegal but ignored and even condoned by the only people who can stop them from happening. that promotes and normalizes violence and then we get calls to end violence when it spills into regular un political targets.
perception is the only difference. thats all. nazis everywhere. not alot of results. but they are coming! just you wait. oh not today maybe tom. no? i mean next month. at what point is that rhetoric misinformation? those who get the sanitized perspective will grab the binoculars to look right past the "peacful" riot to find the one that they are not condoning. they are confirmed when they are wrong because "mistakes were made". if my ALL institutions and outlets can be fooled with all these resources, how can you blame me for blindly following? "we" all were fooled so no big deal. on to the next false story or call for action. propaganda is working when it has people perfectly fine with being hipocrites. trump is indicted for a sex scandal but clinton is on dozens of flight logs with a pedophile. no charges coming and many are ok with it. trump is impeached for Ukraine. biden admitted direct threats to them on video in exchange for US dollars. trump is a racist while biden jungle statements are no big deal. trump reduces non violent crime sentances kamala prosecuted them to the fullest to use as state workforce so.e would compare to slavery.
one is pure evil the other is not. why is this perception slanted in one direction. if that is not questioned then we will always see division and polarization.
i certainly don't expect you to understand. you most likely think im talking conspiracy nonsense..if you got this far reading this rant. i dont think things can get better unless people wake up to perception and narrative manipulated. the gov institutions and long standing media org that could be trusted in the past are not the same today. they are zombified husks living off accomplishments and integrity those before them worked hard building in public trust. squandering it for a audience that craves stories that gives the perception they agree with or are afraid of being cancelled for not following. that goes against everything journalism stood for.
-
1
-
1
-
Transsurrection in TN, MT, TX, IA: All the documented events that aren't happening.
in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Posted · Edited by Buffarukus
you keep jumping topics to avoid the subject. the books that are being "banned" ARE the pornography. you just said cpp should get involved when children are shown pornography. THATS THE GOV! now your saying each book needs a law? asking repeatedly that gov shouldnt be involved with books. this from the guy that is perfectly ok with gov "getting involved" with social media companies about posts.
your all over the map to simply avoid the very clear simple argument that
kids should not be exposed. if we all agree then there is no gov required but we have people like you that will do backflips to justify it. entire thread is full of examples so "its not happening" "its just gay penguines" is thouroly debunked.
not alot of hope that you arent fully on board with this sick pedo culture forming when all things are added up at this point.