Buffarukus
-
Posts
1,342 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Buffarukus
-
-
9 hours ago, redtail hawk said:
I can assure you, no one wanted the economy to tank...inflation, debt, stock market sucking etc. Surely not the politicians running for re election. It was a global disaster that could have been handled much more efficiently. What matters now is what we do next time. And it will happen. If you don't see wild fires covering the area of SC in Canada as a threat, you're a fool. I feel terrible for the next gen. hope I'm wrong but pretty sure they're screwed. The mountains are their best bet altho I hear Duluth is becoming more popular. Ice box of America but right against the wildfires. they're between a rock and a hard place.
OK so you see global warming as the next major threat that humanity will face. So if you recognize "mistakes" wer made then why are you so sure "mistakes" are not being made or "no one wanted" the negative effects that can be prevented RIGHT NOW with this march towards the fight over global warming. Oh that's right consensus. Sounds like the exact same reasoning that also pushes off any and all responsibility for the small buisnesses that were destroyed from lockdown. Kids who have depression and lost years of learning. People that can't put food on the table because of inflation. Country that spent trillions on plexiglass to "stop the spread and other measures. ect ect that is now in landfills. On and on. I wouldn't be so sure you can make that assurance. Who benefited? The companies who were "safe" made record profits. Elites all put their hands in the PPP cookie jar. Politicians did just fine as they used the "end the virus" and went door to door to collect votes from people who normally wouldn't change their sweatpants to go to a voting station. Biggest transfer of wealth in American history was last few years. It's nieve to think a ton of people are not ecstatic with how the virus worked out.
So what do I mean about repeating mistakes and useful idiots doing what they do best? Whos really learning lessons for "next time"? I'm not talking about flat out denial. I'm talking about flat out acceptance and advocation of anything they/you are told regardless of basic logic. No scientific degree is required to ask logical questions just like none was required to ask why natural immunity was completely ignored or why A VIRUS FROM A LAB THAT MADE VIRUSES WAS NOT EVEN CONSIDERED TO BE THE ORGIN. Little things like that.
For instance. Why are the elites still gobbling up waterfront property they all swear will be under water in a few years? Not just one crazy one. A ton of them still acquiring property they swear are going to have zero value very soon. Odd.
Why is their a rich history in this country of predicted weather global disaster after disaster that seem to never have come to any type fruition. Look it up. The planet was doomed to go through another ice age not long ago. All scientist agreed, every paper said it. Ozone layer was irreparably damaged. We are doomed again. Record heatwaves have been recorded in our past. Hotter then anything we see now. A inconvenient truth came out and claimed we are all dead by now. Numerous predictions naming years left then silently pushing it back. Journalists secretly recorded saying they love the clickbait stories they can make.
Why are democrats completely ignoring the obvious climate disasters and suffering they are implementing. The destruction and slavery required for the mining rare earth minerals going on. The complete lack of electrical infrastructure to do ANYTHING that is being implemented. Money to end gas stoves and pizza ovens. no word yet on major efforts on forest care that would prevent the yearly infernos in cali obliterating trees? Canada? The waste that battery acid and electrical components when that Shiney car and every
battery powered thing is out of commission. The fact they use COAL to make most electricity. The inconsistencies of green power to sustain anything. The price point that is not in reach and has no promises to ever get their yet is still being demanded on a population that will prob never be able to afford them.
Just a few legitamate questions that require legitamate in depth answers from the people making the policies. If you don't want the answers then I'm not seeing a lesson learned the last few years and not seeing anyone but "consiracy therorists" that will hold anyone accountable if this too ends up hurting the people who always pay the price..the working poor.
-
5 hours ago, redtail hawk said:
what lies have been proven. be specific.
It's 2023 and there is tons of info on how the lockdowns did nothing. how useless the vax and all the claims they made alongside our leadership were complete lies that were not even done during trials to even have been thought about let alone stated as fact such as preventing transmission ect ect Common sense would tell you if it was "safe and effective" as they promise their would be no need for the removal of liability. Masks were a joke yet you want proof straping a cloth to your face did a thing against a airborn miro contagion? 6 ft distancing was decided from thin air. Blm was safe everything else including GYMS were death traps. Mega corps to pile in were safe small buisnesses were certain doom. The death tickers on all the news outlets magically vanished after a election even though more deaths occurred.
Why would I need to prove anything at this point? It's all right there. Like I said your either too embarrassed, blind or conceded to know that if you believed the democrats who used it for power or the people who happened to profit from it all you were played for a sucker. All this "conspiracy" talk and all this loyalty to consensus showed that lies go very far and very deep when they want to and people will do as their told even as common sense and reality say otherwise. To the point years after some still need others to gather proof on a small message board when it's all documented if you simply look.
Pick one of the dozens of lies that were debunked by "conspiracy" I'll go in depth. Do I need to? There's a entire thread with tons of links and info on this very board.
-
6 hours ago, redtail hawk said:
This is the MAGA fascist blueprint. Don't believe experts. Don't believe journalists. Don't believe your eyes or ears. This is not a new gameplan yet millions are falling for it. Believe us because we own you and will rule you. morons...
yet all the info you were told is now proven to have been lies and yet you still hold on to them. keep believing your eyes and ears that are telling you they were wrong because your too dense or egotistical to admit you fell for it even though it made zero sense. that is what being a sheep/drone does and how fascism and every other ideology exists. people just going along with what they are told and attacking any who question those in power.
-
3 hours ago, Doc Brown said:
Not really surprising as in simple terms with a football example.... Republicans want to conserve the country they have (proud of the job McDermott has done and he should stay the course) while Democrats want to make changes to improve it (McDermott needs to improve in the playoffs to win the Super Bowl or he should be fired). Independents don't feel represented and are conflicted (Pegula should only fire McDermott if there's a proven viable replacement). It will ebb and flow with the societal conditions at the time (we are wasting Allen in his prime).
pretty simplistic but if we remain mostly vague and scratch the outer surface can we get a clearer picture?
if we look at the factions each side considers extreme. optics alone.
one side is dressed head to toe in american flags and red ballcaps. the other is dressed head to toe in black with masks and umbrellas to cover their identities. their only symbolism seems to be rainbow flags now that were switched from blm flags.
with no other context, what does that say? it says to me one believes they are fighting for the country while the other is fighting for causes that change dep on changing cultural social trends.
if we look at policies in states. one side is seeing a mass influx of people and economic growth while the other is seeing population fleeing and economic decay as major legacy chains are announcing mass closings across them?
things can obviously be broken down a ton but from a birds eye view things like this are a indicator of what is going on.
if we talk about fundamentals of party. one is fighting for what they always have (whats really changed?). but the other. well, they are flipping alot of their CORE beliefs 180 to fight AGAINST those who they agreed with just a decade ago. seeing people as skin color and not a individuals being a major one. freedom of speech regardless if its agreeable. only one side looks at anyone who still believes in its past longstanding principals as a extremist and part of the opposing side now.
I may have blindspots but the change i see from the right is actually in a more progressive way. trump acknowledged same sex marriage. stance on censorship is far more laxed now that they have largely been targets of it. unquestionable allegiance to US power war/fbi/cia ect.ect. these were leftist positions my entire life and now determine i am far right.
-
6 hours ago, DrW said:
Interesting point from a historical perspective. However, the George Floyd aftermath seems to show that a general population which is allowed to carry arms is not able to prevent such riots.
it can. but i guess we learned it won't. who can blame anyone when its government and media approved destruction. i mean when rioters are murdering the very people they are screaming lives matter and don't skip a beat. when they are destroying the very neighborhoods they say need the most help and the narrative is how peaceful it is. yeah i think your dealing with nothing but state sanctioned lunatics that are destroying with zero accountability or regard of purpose. the only thing that can truly stop that is the people who truley believed in the causes condemning and removing the rioters who used them as cover. that did not happen on a large scale. so the aggressors were repeatedly defined as the victims and anyone who stood up, gun or not, was going to be villianized and prosecuted under the full weight of the law. not alot of people willing to put themselves in that position. duck and cover and hope you have no choice because you WILL be risking your life regardless if you survive.
on the other hand one gun and one bullet stopped the jan 6th riot. not alot of talk about mostly peaceful or murder of a unarmed person in the news on that. throw in prosecutions of anyone even close to the building and its safe to say you wont be seeing that type of "protest" /"riot" again any time soon. armed population would be MUCH more emboldened to step in front of that type of chaos. they know there is a medal prob waiting for their actions.
i guess narrative is really is the main thread that holds civilized society together in the end because the country has alot more useful idiots then i could have imagined.
-
1 hour ago, BillStime said:
See - this is how it works - Jacqueline Ma should rot in jail if a jury find her guilty.
Was that hard?
Now do guns.
lol shows your reading comprehension. "how that works" was done in my post a few replies back dummy. i dont need to be backed into a corner to do that. you know onr of the replys you edited half a sentance out to make a idiotic point and attribute it to me when i never even came close to suggesting it. but i do notice you suddenly recognize individuals and not a entire groups. funny how that happens.
anyways no. i won't do guns next and point out the overwhelming disparity in democrat strongholds that ignore daily mass shootings. we already know you will blame law abiding gun owners and "the right cult" for it. not in the mood.
i think i made you look foolish enough for now. go to the playground with your friends. i have adult things to do.
-
1 hour ago, BillStime said:
Accidentally? LOL
I left the only part that truly mattered.
Another one with zero insight.
Oh look - according to @Buffarukus - parents shouldn't worry about this guy but yes, most definitely keep them away from understanding those scary genders.
gee golly @BillStime you did it again. you accidently became a half functioning idiot in yet another reply.
since we are just putting our own narratives into what people actually say ill just google a story like you.
there we go.
a democrat teacher given awards by you guys is a child predator? multi counts on child porn found. why do you celebrate teachers who have sex with their students? has anyone documented you and your cults dark urges or should i call someone? explain yourself.
wow. pretty easy to be you buddy. no thought required.
-
1
-
-
5 hours ago, BillStime said:
Never any foresight
you wont believe this but you accidentally edited out my words, meaning, and all context in the reply
in the future please be more careful. it makes your attempt to earn a bull sh/÷ political point using the death of children extra pathetic.
thanks.
-
3
-
-
5 hours ago, L Ron Burgundy said:
I think gay/LGBT are almost as likely to get prosecuted for inappropriate actions as anyone. Some of the recent public things we've seen posted here lately...no clue why those things happened in front of children and people didn't get arrested or why parents had kids there.
The Catholic church has probably been held accountable for 1% of their misdeeds with children. Sometimes atrocities come out decades later or more. Many unreported....they've covered up scandals and just moved priests to other areas. The comparison is valid, charity is unrelated.
i really do appreciate you being somewhat rational. though you skipped my explanation ill reply to this. your so close but something is locking you out of full understanding of the issue.
you have never had to worry when you drop your kid off at school some insane right wing teacher was going to secretly take your kid to catholic church every day and leave them with a priest. the schools policy is shhh dont tell dad. he will not understand. we are doing whats best for you. you dont want to burn in hell right kids?
if that was going on. example after example was shown. what would you do? seriously? id hope you would march in there and demand answers. want the people responsible fired immediately. something is very wrong here. you want reading math science. noone asked or signed off for religion in public school. thats what the parents are doing and are being labled as bigots. now imagine the narrative was your against all religion for this. your a anti-semetic, islamaphobic ect for simply demanding parental rights.
we can go further. what if the state you lived in said if your kid believes in only 2 genders and you MUST agree. you are harming your kids mental health with dilusions on spectrum genders that go against basic science. the child should be removed from your care to prevent further misinformation and mental stress. that is the insanity in california at this point and time right now. simply flip the narrative and you can see how crazy this is. imagine how a regular history teacher who is simply teaching the different beliefs in different parts of the world as they done their whole career. they will inevitably get swept in your viscous "attacks" on religion. thats why i say this ideology is actually creating hate and division on the gay community more then ever. why @ChiGoose penguin book he uses alot and many other innocent people and examples are now being swept in. parents are on full alert and rightfully so..because its flat out wrong no matter what is being forced on other peoples children. parents are becoming OVER protective because the left simply wont see the problem they are creating and end it with this agreement. a large movement on anti bullying without all the creepy sexual gender pornographic stuff would be far move effective and universally agreed on. but for some reason it has to be this divisive and controversial way. just like blm absolutley could not be all lives and include all people who wanted police violence/reform and acknowledge PEOPLE with diff skin and backgrounds have dealt with brutality as well. hmmm why does this keep happening.
anyways. if you as a parent were confronted with this ideology. i would be on your side to fight against it just the same. wrong is wrong. i hope i made sense so we can be on the same side...to all parents regardless of politics.
-
1
-
-
5 hours ago, L Ron Burgundy said:
Just about everyone on the left thinks the extreme lgbt examples posted here lately are wrong for children. I'm confident speaking for most of the left there, anyone feel free to disagree.
I also completely agree with Bill regarding the hypocrisy. The catholic church has been doing what the right is complaining about for a long time. Cool though because it's religion? I know individually nobody here is ok with any of this but the right SUDDENLY decided this is their new boogeyman while their community leaders in many cases are worse.
well its good to finally hear someone say it outloud. i addressed your right is "cool with" fully in another topic but exact same reasoning.
here it is again. nobody is cool with catholic priests as predators. im not sure why society as a whole hasnt obliterated the catholic church for their crimes of pushing predators around but the left wasnt ralling much either. they use it as a scapegoat for their CURRENT stance.
the issue is you have predators everywhere! so my question is does a ideology put children in position to be abused or groomed and why is that ADVOCATED by the left? i dont see the right saying YOUR children should be taught things by priests in secrecy. that priests should expose them to sexual/ gender things they are not fully aware of. that anyone who does not want that is a bigot against all religions. that laws preventing those things are evil.
thats the issue. if what you say was true. the left is against the examples then there would BE NO BOOGIEMAN. we would agree that $#it is sick and should not occur under any circumstance. period. the left is saying we dont care we will do what we want to children regardless how similar position it is with pedophiles. keep secrets. teach about sex positions. show them toys. change their clothes and pronouns when they walk into schools. Cali they will TAKE your child if you dont affirm and you think those who refuse to denounce the examples you do are the minority of left!!?? the examples are all recent and continuing to pile up because these deranged people have PERMISSION to take it to extremes by a entire party of gov who ignore them. some even considered HEROs of LGBT. saving lives! so empathetic and brave. encouraging it.
-
1
-
-
14 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:
This is hilarious.
And very, very much the man-man equivalent of drag.
OFFENSIVE LANGUAGE ALERT!
why is it when i give leftist a full description of the issues they either A) cherry pick the reasoning of their choosing and ignore the rest or B) ignore it all together or completely deflect?
ill address this with i dont think this language should be viewed by little children either. you put a language alert yourself so that says something. so since this is your comparison then i guess we agree.
now anything to say on the rest of my reply?
-
1
-
-
4 hours ago, John from Riverside said:
As someone that works directly in this field, this really doesn’t affect how we do admissions that much
I am an admissions counselor at a University here in Southern California
we put weight on diversity, but the diversity is not based on skin color it’s based on other factors for instance, if you are a black person, but come from a well-to-do family and have a mother and a father that are doctors, then you would not be eligible for diversity, fellowships and admission
based on actual metrics and not just pigment? content of character not color of skin?
this was the rational thinking liberals used to know and i think everyone agreed on...except for racists.
-
2
-
-
1 hour ago, The Frankish Reich said:
And which group is the leader in the clubhouse when it comes to "grooming" (if we must use that stupid word). The traditional seemingly respected authority figures like priests and ministers and coaches boy scout troop leaders? Or the drag queens and pride parade marchers? Any parent who's scared to death that his kid might be molested (or to be honest: might start understanding that he's LGBT; isn't that what this is all about?) can say "make sure you're never in a room alone with that drag queen." The authority figures? Not so easy.
its in schools and parents are saying i dont want them alone or teaching these kids (many times in absolute secrecy) about this stuff. you all are freaking out about that parents are fighting against this behavior. your on the opposite side of your own argument.
noone on the right is arguing preists coaches or anyone should supercede a parent let alone advocating it is presented without their permission and complete transparency. if they are doing it then everyone on the planet is for kicking their a$$ and putting thrm in a cell.
as for the drag queens shaking their junk in little kids faces thats self explanatory. if you dont see a clear issue with that then something is wrong. its disgusting regardless of sexual preference. if it was straight guys jiggling their junk would you still be for it? that answer reveals everything.
do you now get a clear picture of the issue?
-
7 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:
I had a couple bowling trophies but they're lost. Frontier lanes.
if you won them. they can never be lost. 1936 37 frontier lane champion is yours forever old timer.
-
1
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:
Dude, I should go to bed but I'm in a gun fight. Can't resist. I don't support the violence that happened there or anywhere. what must we do? What must I do? (Year of living dangerously. Great movie)
Billy Kwan : What then must we do? We must give with love to whoever God has placed in our path. Billy Kwan : -Don't think about the major issues. You do what you can about the misery in front of you.
pretty easy. stop scapegoating. stop exadurating. stop being such a ideological zombie and when a someone brings up sh!t the left is doing, if its fact then dont react with nothing but defensive deflections as if your earning a trophy. you can still rail against the right. theres plenty there.
-
3
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:
My last post was perfectly reasonable. In fact, it was perfect!😇
here the "more training" leftists were screaming about as they tossed molotovs and ambushed officers.
https://time.com/6260567/atlanta-cop-city-protests/
oh right they got into a gun fight with the cops that were building a training facility.
on and on and on. but right wing ideology is dangerous to cops is the example you really went with. perfectly reasonable. lol.
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:
Was the guy in the challenger a bible thumper? How many law enforcement suicides after Jan 6? It's to them like anti vax covid infected coughing on me...
are you serious? police deaths is your example? how many police assassinations during and after blm!!. leftist cheer on their murders all the time!!
Protesters outside hospital shouted 'We hope they die' about deputies ...
https://abc13.com/los-angeles-deputies-ambushed-compton-la-shot-protests/6422147/
forget it red. i asked you a question about direct grooming in another thread and the hate it produces that can easily be stopped. and as expected you as all other leftist ignore it. now your seriously comparing police deaths to ideology.
your just gone. theres no reasonable discussion to be had.
-
1
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:
the incident in Charlottesville springs to mind. Sick people need help. It's not rocket surgery.
ok that goes in two directions. i highly doubt a god loving "bible thumper" is deciding ahh the lust for a man is more important then thal shall not kill.
but rhetoric wise. but political violence wise. you all point to jan 6 repeatedly where one of THEM were killed. its all you really got to point at. left wing on the other hand. plenty of examples including what i laid out... all ignored.
-
1
-
-
6 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:
Yes, we are talking specifically mass shootings
why? ideology killing innocents is the same regardless what is used. or is it because if you take what i said then the margin of victims is completely skewed towards liberal ideology.
but ok. ill leave this fractional example as you see it. it makes no sense to debate such a specific thing when talking about dangerous beliefs that bring about destruction in society but certainly can find many more like the nyc train shooter if i look.
-
3 hours ago, John from Riverside said:
Either keep up with the conversation or don’t jump in
I did not say Bible thumpers were the mass shooters
Bible thumpers preach the hate causes the mass shootings
By the way, I can see why nobody ever moves off their positions. Somebody admits that they make a mistake and you gotta hear about it forever after that.
i dont think alot of people are keeping up. but im getting your overall argument now. well there have been several incidents involving left wing rhetoric that have caused mass killings...or are we talking specifically shootings.
the left is constantly saying white people are racist. anyone who is not a democrat wants to see the annihilation of people of color and gay folks. so several incidents based on that ideology i can recall.
mass shooting of christians by trans person...already brought up.
mass shooting on the NYC subway train by a black supremist.
the incident where the man drove a truck through a xmas parade killing kids and any white person in the path.
should i go on. this was to fight against the "racist" they believe they were surrounded by.
not only that but democratic ideology DOES factor into black on black mass shootings. hell today democrats give every excuse under the sun to ignore and mitigate black crime in general because that just what oppressed people are FORCED to do. dont blame them. its white peoples fault this is happening. lets not forget the ideology that now has police disregard black neighborhoods for fear of "over policing" or having a confrontation that results in loss of job and freedom and its totality. dems disregard the crime, prevention and apprehension. but its not based on politics? plays no factor?
-
30 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:
We are solely talking about mass shootings here and taking a look at their motivations. Overall, they’re not totally one side or the other but the majority of these are people that are easily influenced and gun nuts
whenever you have the Bible thumpers out there, talking violence and parlaying it to not only is God OK with it but God wants it. We are in serious trouble.
Your average person would either agree, or disagree with this silently, but take a look at the mass shooters, and what their motivations have been, especially recently
bible thumpers are taking over the streets of democratic cities where most mass shooting occur every day? strange.
-
4 hours ago, redtail hawk said:
This is really interesting. But I might have worded and phrased it differently. Haters aren’t wired the same. Hate is their primary coping mechanism. Someone else is responsible for their $hitty lives. Simultaneously, they don’t want people to know their true identities. They wear hoods and robes. Deep down, some are ashamed of who they are. A few are proud and are psychopaths.
so kinda the opposite of what is happening with the chanting at pride parades.as interesting as it is, you decided to edit out the point. the direct correlation of pedophile tactics that relate to what the left is doing to other peoples children. you don't acknowledge it because your biased and would love to focus just on your ideological enemies psychology.
"we are coming for your children" is based off love and understanding or something? i didnt know telling people who are concerned about the lefts infatuation with advocating identicle tactics groomers use to "f off" we are going to do it regardless was based on peace, love and understanding of parents who see extremely serious and dangerous tactics used on little kids.
it literally means either they/you have sheltered yourselves from the sick proof that these things are going on or that your fully aware and approve of it.
those are the only two options and there are so many examples at this point its really hard to force myself to believe the former. if its the latter then every fragment of hatred gotten is well deserved.
there are plenty of posts in this forum showing examples of disgusting behavior construed by leftist as inclusion and understanding. are you unaware of it all.
-
4 hours ago, redtail hawk said:
Good article. You should have read til the end
The person who said this in a march isn’t the person who came up with this idea — the person in the march is saying, ‘Go ahead, call me this; why do I care?’” she continued. “The person is trying to destigmatize this and claim their own power. You can’t blame the victims here, and that’s what the right wing is doing.”
those nazis you saw on the trail. oh um yea, just some white folk that are tired of being called racists. thats all. they are sick of being accused of racism so they went out and bought full ss uniforms to take the "power from those accusations"
all nazis are these people. just people becoming what you keep saying they are. stop calling them nazis and they wont BE them. make sense? great. everyone can go back to being normal white people once you stop victimizing them.
red. that is some really REALLY stupid reasoning. you see now that its flipped right?
i laid out the REASONS the left and lgbt are being labled groomers. isolating kids with issues. recommending they go to strangers in secret. introducing disturbing sexual topics. making anyone who suggests they are far to young including parents out to be the enemy.
not a single leftist refutes or condemns THESE behaviors. but sure are quick to decide "we are coming for your children" is perfectly normal and the fault of everyone else but the ones actually chanting it with context of whats going on.
-
1
-
1
-
-
7 hours ago, LeviF said:
The chilling faces of white supremacy.what we see.
what he see.
-
2
-
The Florida Blueprint: Inflation
in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Posted · Edited by Buffarukus
First off
Your actually getting your news from CNN. The network that litterally crumbling to the ground and noone watches unless forced.
Second
Are they looking at housing? So because their is a massive influx of people, prob fleeing from democrat areas (you might want to look up those numbers) there is a demand of people wanting to live in the "republican hell scape" that is constantly pushed...on CNN and the supply of housing is low.
Is that what we are talking about?
Lol. This place is funny. Please proceed with the leftist "own"