transplantbillsfan

Whatever bro. I get mad at myself every time I take you for being thoughtful and waste my time clicking on your links going down rabbit holes watching propoganda crap like what you just posted as some kind of proof of your argument. Just proves how flimsy your argument is. I just hope you'll come back from the Dark Side in November when Trump is ousted.

Use common sense. But fine. I understand why you folks want so desperately to remain in denial.

Jesus man. I post facts and you post an idiotic piece of propoganda. Typical you. Do you honestly waste your time watching a lot of this junk on Youtube and Twitter? I guess that was a rhetorical question since you post so much of the crap all the time. Soooo... what was incorrect about the facts I posted?

He won because everyone thought the Democratic nominee would be the inevitable winner, so they stayed home because they thought their vote would mean less. First and foremost, black voter turnout dropped for the first time in 2 decades and it dropped by 7%, which is a precipitous drop and significant loss specifically for the Democratic Party, which relies largely on the Black vote, which votes like 90% Democrat in every Presidential election cycle. Seriously, think about how inevitable Clinton was to most of the country? Trump won because of 77,744 votes in Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/weekly-standard/the-election-came-down-to-77-744-votes-in-pennsylvania-wisconsin-and-michigan-updated In Pennsylvania, overall turnout was up from 2012 (from 5.6 million to 6 million), but the racial composition of the electorate was significantly different. Clinton won 92 percent of African-Americans and Obama won 93 percent of African-Americans. But in 2012, black voters made up 13 percent of the electorate; in 2016, they comprised just 10 percent of the electorate. In terms of raw votes, that means roughly 130,000 fewer African-Americans voted in Pennsylvania in 2016 than voted in 2012. If those voters had shown up on Tuesday, that alone would've been enough for Clinton to hold Pennsylvania by a razor-thin margin. Does it seem so far in the Democratic primary cycle that black voters are staying home? Throw in the fact that more voters threw away their vote by voting for someone other than the top 2 candidates in the history of the US. Just think about that for a minute: 7.8 million people in our Country threw their vote in the garbage by voting for 3rd party candidates. I've spoken with some people who did that, specificially because they refused to vote for Clinton despite the fact that they despised Trump. It's nothing more than anecdotal, but these same people (there are 3 of them I've spoken in depth about this with) told me that in the next election they'd vote for whoever runs against Trump. I know you guys are in your bubble over here. We're all in our own little bubbles. But boy do I have a feeling that this board will implode when Trump loses in November. Don't worry about me if Trump wins. I'll be fine, plus I'll be sporting a new avatar for awhile.

I will vote Biden over Trump I will vote Sanders over Trump I will vote Gabbard over Trump Whoever the Democratic nominee over Trump. Period. And there are a loooOOOOOOOttt of people in this Country who feel the same.

Okay then, be a baby. Don't admit you've been wrong for nearly a year now. I'm very sorry. I'm sure you're not as desperately in need of repair in person as you are on the Internet

Unfortunately you still don't get it. This election is about Trump, not about whoever the Democratic nominee will be. I know you guys over here are in denial about this right now, but we'll circle back to it after the election in November and you can thank me for trying to keep you informed months in advance

Links? It's deep and buried in these threads. If there were a very quick way for me to search for individual posts made by you in July, I would. Scrolling through a 373 page thread to search for posts by you that you'll clearly just twist the meaning of afterwards rather than admit you were wrong is just not worth it. Do you have a quick way to search for posts 6 or 7 months old? If you do, I'll post some links, assuming you don't go back and try to alter them--although I did quote most of them anyway so they exist for posterity's sake, even if they're a pain in the arse to pull up.

No, I'm asking you to man up and concede something you've said for nearly a full year. Methinks thou dost protest too much

I asked you to concede you're overt nearly year-long-blunder first. Do that and I'll answer your question, though I'll have to be reminded of your question because I was waiting for your concession before even really reading just about any other post of yours.

Oy I'm sorry my friend, but I really hope in your personal life you're more capable of admitting when you're wrong. Happy Primary Day, though. Think Joe loses the delegate count today?

Probably because you won't admit how utterly dead wrong you were. Not about the General (yet), but about the Primary. Just admit you were dead wrong when you said many times Joe didn't have a shot to win the Democratic nomination. I know it takes some humility in order to do that, but it'll make you feel good as you take baby steps forward as a human being

Good example of how 2 people can view a scene in 2 different ways. This is the interaction when Biden was confronted by that guy saying "you are actively trying to infringe our Second Amendment right and take away our guns." Biden was pretty angry at what he clearly and genuinely feels is a lie--and whether or not you believe he's really doing it, he believes he isn't. At which point Biden says he's "full of *****" to his face and stands there continuing to talk to him. The guy says something about having a video of it to which Biden responds how it's probably just another deep fake. Frankly, Biden deserves more respect than you're giving him for standing there and continuing to address some moron who's clearly just looking to be part of a viral moment. It's more than our Paper Tiger President would ever do. He'd probably find a way to walk away as quickly from the situation as possible and then call the guy names on Twitter. What???? You're almost as unintelligible as @OldTimeAFLGuy

@Deranged Rhino" He's got no chance. None. Tuesday will be fun to watch you come back with a new story about how you never were that high on Ol' Joe. " Literally all about the Primary. It'd be a little sad and pathetic how stubborn you're being about this if it weren't so damn funny.

@Deranged Rhino: "First you were certain Biden would be the one to end Trump — then he cratered like I promised he would." Channeling my inner Yoda: Crater did he?

Hmmmm... talking about the General, eh? @Deranged Rhino: "From the beginning you said it was a sure thing that Joe would win the nomination and beat Trump. You hit that hard, repeatedly (not that you wanted Joe, but that's how it would go) -- I told you that Joe had no chance. And he doesn't. "

Wow. Look. You're still denying. Just incredible. There's no running from being wrong in November for you when Trump Loses.

No victory lap. @Deranged Rhino was just very, very wrong about something he was absolutely certain of and rather than admit how consistently he claimed he was absolutely certain about something that has already been proven false, he denies he ever adamantly argued such a thing. So no victory lap. Just some good old fashioned ribbing.

Hey @Deranged Rhino... notice this post? It's you literally saying Joe had no chance to win the Democratic nomination Good natured ribbing is all good... but... Never had a chance??? It's okay though @Deranged Rhino, we all understand your adamant refusal to admit how completely and utterly dead wrong you were about something you said had, and I quote, "no chance" of happening. It's hard to admit you're wrong. But I think seeing so many examples of how utterly dead wrong you were in the last couple months alone (quotes from you like this going back for almost a full year now) is going to help you reach that all important stage you need to reach: ACCEPTANCE. "No chance" he says yet again...

Just thought I'd bring up a "best of" for @Deranged Rhino on the eve of another Democratic primary since he seems a guy who needs to learn humility.

Hmmm... this might just answer my initial question:

How much is the Glenlivet 14 year Cognac Cask? I've never heard of it and I'm intrigued.

https://theathletic.com/1650815/2020/03/03/bills-thoughts-from-the-combine-wide-receiver-chase-and-shaq-lawson/ Bills thoughts from the combine: Wide receiver chase and Shaq Lawson By Matthew Fairburn Mar 3, 2020 5. The Bills have some extensions of their own players to get done in the coming months, but Beane made a point to say those have typically happened after the draft. The next few months are busy with free agency, pro days and then the draft, so it’s tough to find the time to dedicate to contract talks. Agents are also playing a waiting game at the moment with the CBA talks ongoing. At the moment, it sounds like extensions for Dion Dawkins, Matt Milano and Tre’Davious White are a matter of when and not if. The Bills view all three as part of their long-term core and want to reward their own. The one who will be interesting to watch over the next few months is Jordan Poyer. He’s entering the final season of his deal but will be 29 years old in April. He and Micah Hyde have been the lifeblood of one of the league’s best secondaries and both have dramatically outperformed their current contracts. Pay attention to the players the Bills add in free agency and the draft because it might provide some clues about how they view Poyer long-term. He’s going to get a healthy raise one way or another. The Bills must decide if they want to be the ones to give it to him.