Jump to content

Bray Wyatt

Community Member
  • Posts

    3,858
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Bray Wyatt

  1. 13 minutes ago, Billz4ever said:

    Don't think so.  The opt out and dead cap counts against next year.  If we take on his contract, and the opt out option is triggered, that trigger would be under contract with the Bills, not the Panthers.

    All guarantees stay with the team that signed the deal, which is what creates dead cap, they don’t transfer to the bills 

    • Like (+1) 1
  2. 3 hours ago, Big Turk said:

     

    So last year week 4 our opening possessions in the first half went:

     

    8 plays 75 yards TD

    3 plays -14 yards PUNT

    5 plays 75 yards TD

    7 plays 62 yards FG

    2 plays 68 yards TD

    EOH

     

     

    Last year playoffs:

    13 plays 71 yards TD

    9 plays 24 yards PUNT

    3 plays 6 yards PUNT

    7 plays 75 yards TD

     

     I am not sure where you see them starting slow, they scored TD's on both opening drives.

     

     


    There were two other games as well, so outside of the one where we won, we got out slow imo, first time we only scored 17, then afc championship we only had 15 points through 3 quarters. 
     

    13 seconds game we had 14 points til almost the end of the 3rd Q. We need to do better, the one game we won we scored early and often

  3. We know Josh has seen Spagnuolo's defense a few years now, but we have yet to see Dorsey call a game against him. I am interested to see if he makes some changes. I always felt Spag's had a good plan against Daboll (he knew the new england style offense well) and slowed us down to start and Daboll was slow to adjust.  If we can get out of the gate fast, I think that could be the key.

  4. 2 minutes ago, Warcodered said:

    I know they looked terrible against the 49ers, but they always do.

     

    Its more of a similar style of defense they are going up against. Their pass rush is legit and I think will cause Stafford problems. If they (Dallas) can score over 20 points I think they can win

  5. 29 minutes ago, Logic said:

    I understand the "respect every opponent" perspective, but barring catastrophic injury, I don't see any way the Steelers win this one.

    McDermott's defenses consistently dominate rookie quarterbacks. I don't have the exact numbers, but they OVERWHELMINGLY favor the Bills defense. Have the Bills under McDermott EVER lost to a rookie quarterback?

    Beyond that, we're talking about the 24th ranked scoring offense in the league going against a defense that has allowed just seven total second half points across four games. A defense which has effectively limited McVay's Rams, Derrick Henry, and Lamar Jackson.  Forgive me for not believing that the insertion of a rookie quarterback is going to jumpstart the bottom tier Steelers offense enough to beat the Bills. I just don't see it.

    This week looks like a relatively sure win to me. The following two games, against the Chiefs and Packers? THOSE games we can wring our hands about. But the Steelers? I'm not buying it.

     

    Mac Jones in the wind game last year

    • Like (+1) 2
  6. I remember thinking when McD first came here and we were trying to figure out who he would draft in the first round, that he wasn't going to use a first on a DB as in Carolina and other places he made the lower rounds DBs play really well. Then we took Tre lol

     

     

  7. 7 hours ago, Bob in STL said:

    He started the Bengals too. 

     

    If I remember correctly he did it because he was upset with how he left the browns?

    6 hours ago, RocCityRoller said:

     

    Paul Brown was the Owner/ President of the Bengals from 1968-1991.

     

    If it's Football and in Ohio, it is related to Paul Brown in some way.

     

    Yep, still amusing that the team name of the Browns has to go on the road and play in his stadium to me. Why the disagree on my comment though?

    • Like (+1) 1
  8. 12 minutes ago, Billsatlastin2018 said:

     

    If he had taken another step while maintianing possession then I think yes the chances are it would have been called a touchdown on the field and reviewing would have been academic anyway. 

     

    There is an inconsistency in the NFL rulebook - I will grant you this - that a running back can lose control of the ball a millisecond after he has broken the plane of the goalline and it is a touchdown regardless. But for a catch in the endzone the usual catch rules apply. I get why it is that way but it is frustratingly inconsistent. 
     

    I gave up on this idiotic NFL parsing of a catch,when Dez Bryant was ruled incomplete v.s. the Packers Playoff game.

     

    100% Bryant changed from a WR to a RB, the moment his feet hit the ground. And like any trained Receiver he reached the ball out to spike the Goal Line! Becoming a Running Back doing exactly the same thing.

     

    THAT WAS HIS FOOTBALL MOVE… REACHING FOR THE GOAL LINE!

     

    This wasnt the rule at the time of the Dez catch and was changed to this because of that

×
×
  • Create New...