Commsvet11

So here is my question, every time a cop shoots someone unarmed, it’s the cops fault, but every time we have a mass shooting, it’s the guns fault? Which one is it?

What exactly is insured? I’m seeing a charity, not insurance.

When you hear these reports of authority figures whom didn’t do their duty, this is why we cannot just allow military, police, armed security to own weapons, and nobody else. This situation has plenty of blame, but blaming guns for is a lazy, superficial reason.

The second amendment is written so that I can fight back against a tyrannical government, foreign or domestic. There is a principle that holds true today, when at war, it’s much easier to fight a military, armed civilians however are much harder, there are no uniforms, there are smaller groups of citizens, it’s plain chaos, which is why the U.S. military has had a hard time with insurgents in the Middle East, there is no clear enemy.

Majority of high school students are immature, and emotional, although understandably emotional, in light of recent events. Emotions cloud judgement. There was an emotional response to the bombing of Pearl Harbor, and that was to start a Japanese American internment camps, who by the way had weapons confiscated. So when you say “they are coming” like it’s a ridiculous concept keep in mind it once happened, with FDR running the show.

What’s interesting to me Is when B.B. retires, New England loses a Head Coach AND General Manager correct? New England will have to find a GM who wants McDaniels to be head coach, that might cause limitations to the search, unless McDaniels becomes coach and GM, that’s a lot of confidence in one man. If McDaniels did this for his family I have a feeling he will have plenty of time to spend with them soon.

The question should really be which two games will the refs give to the pats?

Because we discuss yet again how shady your teams organization is? We can’t help that it gets highlighted nearly every year, but no, your right, majority of 31 other fan bases, must have it wrong.

Bypassing the Rooney rule that way, you would be correct, so long as that language is written in the contract, probably part of the sweetening of his contract, mentioned earlier. Now what is convenient is this happens just right before he is to start HC for the colts, I mean could the Pats organization could have renegotiated his contract anytime, so why did they wait until the last minute?

Well that’s one way but now you have collusion, a bypass of protocol, oh it’s a shady deal alright, but it’s to be expected from that organization.

If true, does that not violate the Rooney rule?

I was really impressed with Romo in the booth, I agree I think he would be an excellent choice for coaching

I disagree, I think we had a successful season, We made the playoffs, played competitively in the playoffs, and have something to build on, done by a rookie head coach who had a bad QB. My expectations are met for this year. Next year they will be higher, If we can get a QB well, we should be making some noise next year.

Seriously guys, I know we all don’t all get along but this right here makes me proud that we are all bills fans and we are the BEST fans in the NFL and it is showing how classy we really are!

And sorry we aren’t Tennessee, We’ll do our best to play that role on Sunday

Well If you tell me I'm doing a simple confirmation bias then I'd say you are doing an appeal to authority bias. The bills haven't made the playoffs in 17 years. Any fan could have had that result. No one knows what a GM actually does unless they have done it? Seriously? That is like saying you can't do your taxes unless your an accountant for H&R Block. Also it doesn't take knowing ones job to see a bad job done.

While that's true, think of this, I could have ran the bills for 17 years with the same result. So could you have.

I always lurked between BBMB, TSW, Billszone, and the range, but I posted on BBMB, nice to see some of the banned posters on BBMB that came here.