Jump to content

JohnBonhamRocks

Community Member
  • Posts

    4,354
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by JohnBonhamRocks

  1. Trades: 

    - 28 & 144 to SF for 31 & 63

    - 63 & 163 to ARI for 66 & 104

    - 104, 160, & 204 to GB for 91

    - 128, 133, & 200 to CIN for 115 & 149

     

    31. Xavier Worthy - WR - Texas

    60. Adisa Isaac - DE - Penn State

    66. Ja’Lynn Polk - WR - Washington

    91. Michael Hall, Jr. - DT - Ohio State

    115. Dadrion Taylor-Demerson - S - Texas Tech

    149. Javon Baker - WR - UCF

    248. Kimani Vidal - HB - Troy

     

    Only regret is not adding to the OL. Otherwise, WR room is stocked, some nice pieces added to the DL, and we get decent prospects at S and HB. 
     

  2. 28 minutes ago, MasterStrategist said:

    I'm with you on Worthy, he was my guy even before the Combine.  Knew he would crush the 40, he's going to have a Zay Flowers type season for some team (hopefully us).  If he played on Oregon or another team with a legit QB, he'd be a top 15 guy.

     

    Agree it would be nice to draft a complementary tandem at WR, bigger bodied as you say.  Someone who is a better blocker, can win downfield on 50/50 attempts and redzone.

     

    I like Tez and Coleman in Rd2, but don't think Beane will double dip that early.  If we wait until 4th, I like Javon Baker alot.  And some others that might slide due to it being a deep class.


    Not sure Baker makes it to the 4th round, but I would be very happy with a Worthy/Baker double-dip. 

    • Agree 1
  3. 5 minutes ago, SWATeam said:

    I think the complete focus on an outside guy is overstated.

     

    Yes, we need to replace Gabe.  But we also need to replace Diggs.  Made we get a Ladd or Pearsal early to play the Y and get an X later or via trade or something.


    Agreed. I think they want a WR room full of guys who can line up anywhere. 

    • Like (+1) 2
  4. 1 minute ago, Mike in Horseheads said:

    I agree with others that said we dumped Diggs to get out of cap hell, so why would the Bills just do this again 🤷‍♂️


    The cap does not seem to be the only factor that went into parting ways with Diggs imho

    • Like (+1) 2
    • Agree 4
  5. 2 hours ago, Beast said:


    You should have quit after 2. 🍺


    I’ve said before….I believe the Bills are going to have a make-over when they open the new stadium. And I mean a new logo and new look. Not anyting from the past. Just a gut feeling.


    Hope not especially if they go the way of other teams recently who look like they play in arena football leagues. 
     

    I know Zubaz won’t happen but hey a fan can dream and at least they would be unique.

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Agree 1
  6. Their true needs appear to be WR, DE, and S. 
     

    Likeliest imho is a WR in round one after a modest trade up or at 28, then a DE or BPA at 60, before addressing S in round 4. Would not mind a S like Bullard if there at 60 and then a DE like Kamara if there in round 4.

     

    But who knows, maybe Beane has that Tre White money coming in June reserved for a vet S or DE with whom he already has a handshake deal…

    • Like (+1) 1
  7. So many takes, so little time.

     

    The trade is a good move overall and netted good return given the contract situation, the unsettled relationship, and compared with other recent trades of WRs around the league. The bad move was the extension that made this trade of an albatross necessary. Rather Beane grab a lifeboat than go down with the ship. Still, we are not rebuilding, just being smart and objective about bad contracts. 

     

    Diggs gave us some great entertainment and production, but the sun is setting on his career. The Bills showed last season down the stretch that he is replaceable.

     

    I wonder how little value we could give up to get in position for one of the big 3 WRs in this draft.
     

    Also, yes, the money freed up next year can be used for a new deal if we were to trade for a WR - just need to structure the hits that way. 

    • Like (+1) 1
  8. Using ProFootballNetwork’s Mock Draft Simulator:

     

    28. Xavier Worthy - WR - Texas

     

    *traded back from 60 to 80 and netted 97*


    80. Javon Bullard - S - Georgia

     

    97. DeWayne Carter - DT - Duke

     

    128. Javon Baker - WR - UCF

     

    133. Tanor Bortolini - OL - Wisconsin

     

    144. Cedric Johnson - DL - Ole Miss

     

    160. Isaiah Davis - HB - South Dakota State

     

    163. M.J. Devonshire - CB - Pittsburgh

     

    189. Trey Taylor - S - Air Force

     

    200. Mohamed Kamara - DL - Colorado

     

    204. Jordan Whittington - WR - Texas

     

    248. Jaden Crumedy - DT - Mississippi State

    • Like (+1) 2
  9. 15 minutes ago, SCBills said:

    Any chance we double dip at WR this year?  If we’re thinking about taking a guy like Tez Walker, I’d be for it but would hope he’s the second part of a two WR draft. 
     

    High potential guy, but not remotely close enough to the level of polish to be the only guy we take. 


    Yes, I see it as likely that the Bills take one at 28 or 60 (or one of our top two picks if we trade) and another at the end of round 4.

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Agree 1
  10. 33 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

     

    No, I see him as more of a slot at the next level. His skill set is too redundant for what we already have on the roster for my liking. I want someone with physical traits, top end size/strength or speed or both.


    Definitely not top end size but his speed and quickness I think are top end.

  11. 2 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

     

    I don't think so. Beane called Samuel a "weapon" when asked about him and alluded to his early days in Carolina when he was a hybrid RB/WR. I think they see him as the much better version of McKenzie/Harty. Clearly they value that role, they just haven't been able to get it right yet. Throwing a lot of money at Samuel is a way of them finally getting that role figured out once and for all. It won't preclude them from drafting a true outside WR high in the draft.


    Which prospects do you think fall under that umbrella?

×
×
  • Create New...