GoBills808

i was watching Keon specifically today he was shockingly bad on broadcast. he got pingponged on one of his routes by someone named juju brents like he was in jv

lol no offense OP but so ridiculous it's come to this

Yes

Correct Because the McDermott would have been fired and we'd have another coach who would have won one by now

😂😂scared lol yes, i would prefer playing any combination of Broncos/Steelers/Colts/Chargers for three road games than two home games vs one if not both of Chiefs/Ravens. its not even a question for me

No offense taken You don't seem to understand the thread I'd rather take the 5seed w zero chance of having to play either KC or Ravens to get to the SB. You would prefer having to play likely at least one of them for some reason

seriously we've never even been to the SB in this era and people are worried about how a championship is going to be perceived lol

i don't think the 1 seed is the advantage you seem to, especially this year final season in the stadium is fan talk tbh...players don't really care about that. we haven't shown that we're significantly stronger vs top AFC teams at home as opposed to on the road. what we have shown is an ability to smack second tier AFC teams in the playoffs so the option to avoid the stronger teams is the obvious choice

ravens are favored to win AFCN as of today and Chiefs are basically even$ to Broncos who I don't trust

5seed and it's not close must avoid Chiefs and Baltimore at all costs

this thread is about the offense not the salary cap

could not disagree more w this i believe we were closest to winning the SB in 2021. if you want to maintain we're closer now than we were then i can understand why youd feel this way and nobody's missing the point of how we got here. in fact some folks predicted the offense would look this way 2 offseasons ago when it became apparent this was the direction they were headed. i just happen to think it's the wrong way to maximize our SB chances, this yr and the following ones

i think you'll be hard pressed to define a goal short of 'win the SB this year at all costs' tbh and i don't think you're giving people who want a more sophisticated passing offense enough credit

correct improve on what you do well and let's be clear- the engine is allen and the offense. you want to fix a cracked windshield and i want to put a turbo in

right lol have we not been paying attention the last 5yrs? the offense ALWAYS produces and it's never been quite good enough

no the subtext of the WR criticisms is some fans want to win a championship and some fans are more concerned about where to lay the blame

it's not the personnel on defense, it's the system. and it's always going to get exposed postseason. there's no reason to think this year will be any different so yes, the offense needs to be better

it's not broken it just needs to be better to win a Super Bowl

it is so much easier to play QB when you're throwing at guys like Chase and Higgins I still remember Mahomes chucking it downfield to Hill and getting rewarded w some of the most ridiculous catches having guys like Chase/Hill etc that can just make you right as a QB in all situations, on all throws is such a benefit

Burrow's fine Jared Goff tier

Not surprising coming from a rookie Guys who have been here know better by now to take anything from regular season chiefs games

ok so after watching it a third time i still don't think it supports the idea that you should run the ball at a higher frequency than passing what i think he calculated is at what frequency your defense is indifferent, in terms of expected yards, to whether the opposing offense throws or runs

i got it 👍 ok so i have to ask- is he graphing the optimum run/pass mix on offense or did he actually graph the optimum run/pass playcall on defense? i think those are two separate things

I only see where he graphed the scenario wherein defenses react rationally to corresponding changes in run/pass%?

of course i watched it lol it's not game theory either, it's just faulty logic his proof at is based on the premise that defenses are 100% efficient in matching pass plays w 'pass defenses' (no data for what that entails) and vice versa...which we know is not the case as evidenced by the wind bowl vs the Patriots that one year