Jump to content

Numark3

Community Member
  • Posts

    2,295
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Numark3

  1. Not to be that person....but how in god's name do any of you know how good brown's hands are? Maybe, despite the play today, he has really good hands? Of all the things to complain about, this screams "couch coach." Do you know how good brown's hands are, or have seen this drill in practice? No. Then how do you complain about him being on the hands team? Ignorantly.
  2. yea no LMALOLOLMAOOO
  3. Can mods put this thread in his signature. Thanks!
  4. I have actually adjusted to her voice as the game has gone on and she is fine imo. It was no doubt jarring at first
  5. Yea, for McCoy lol I don't think this gets recognized enough for being one of the most lopsided trades in bills history.
  6. He hasn't been a discussion point here for awhile. But reading over the dolphins message board, they can't stand him. He looks terrible today, and McCoy has been clowning him all half (is it a feud if it is so one-sided?) Great trade by the bills
  7. But it wasn't just that the punts were getting off slightly, it is also ripe for muffed snaps or mistakes under pressure. Good points about the potential penalties though, that type of penalty is always a backbreaker.
  8. I was curious about this, and was talking to a friend about this during the game. On punts, the snow was essentially playing the role of the punt returner. In the sense the ball was not rolling, and dropping dead when it hit the ground. Muffing the ball was also a concern on punt returns. On the other side of the punt plays, teams were taking a longer time to get the punt off it seemed, and chances of the punter muffing the snap are increased in the snow. So why not have no punt returner and attempt to block the punts with an extra man rushing? Am I clueless or decent idea? Not saying the bills should have done this, just football discussion.
  9. That just is not how it works... Webb throwing that INT before the end of the game isnt a good play merely because we ended up in overtime.
  10. I think their probability just tracks what the win outcome of teams are based on past nfl results. It wouldn't factor in stuff like weather, though with enough of a sample you don't have to.
  11. You realize overtime ends after 10 minutes? it wasnt that the colts would have to go the length of the field. If they converted one or two first downs the game is going to be a tie at best (and season over)
  12. And I dont think it was gutless, I think he just has a poor grasp of the clock. Most coaches do. If the clock didn't make this such a dumb decision, then it would be arguably be the correct call. The best part of it was the he used a timeout and then still sent out the punt team. Then later left 15 seconds run off the clock before calling the final timeout. It is just bad clock management.
  13. I think if you google bills vs colts and look at the summary tab there is the chart. And I am going to be honest with you, it probably is not a very exact science lol.* But the second half of my post explaining the logic is where its at. I doubt it takes into the weather conditions. But that would only prove my point more. Driving 60 70 yards in the snow is much less likely than converting a 4th and one and moving the ball 10 yards
  14. Sure go look at the win probability chart on espn that tracks the game play by play. Our chances of winning the game were much lower by the time we got the ball back compared to when it was 4th and 1. And its not rocket science. The chances of converting a 4th and 1 and getting 10-15 yards is a lot better than punting, getting a three and out, and driving 60-70 yards. It took the colts missing a wide open received when they had the ball, a bomb, and a long run.
  15. It was a bad call and really lowered their probability of winning. They still won though despite it. All it took was two 30+ yards playd
  16. The goof tried to kick the game winning FG in regulation from a distance instead of trying to get closer. For no reason lol
  17. Well your thread was closed because it probably fell under the "pointless" close thread rule. Same with this one. Wah baby wah
  18. I still think objective elements of penalties should be reviewable
  19. Woah that was one of the worst calls I have ever seen (it is called unnecessary roughness on the bills). How does the NFL address calls like this being made weekly... Mind you, this is on the chiefs final drive in a one score game past midfield. It does not get much more crucial timing than this. Holy smokes
  20. Doesnt the road team having a winning record for Thursday night games?
  21. The people driving this are trolling. And its a good one and they have my approval. The people that followed it and sincerely think its a good idea....eeesh. Thats kinda scary.
  22. Imagine if I had an hour tape of you every week. And one time you picked your nose. And I declared you as a nose-picker and issue we need to work on with you. That would be silly and without foundation, wouldnt it? Finding own instance of something out of context, and then generalizing it is illogical.
  23. A lot of people are casual fans and don't really understand how things work
×
×
  • Create New...