KRC

Any consciousness whatsoever that is past, future, or present; internal or external; blatant or subtle; common or sublime; far or near: every consciousness is to be seen as it actually is with right discernment as: 'This is not mine. This is not my self. This is not what I am.' Seeing thus, the well-instructed disciple of the noble ones grows disenchanted with the body, disenchanted with feeling, disenchanted with perception, disenchanted with fabrications, disenchanted with consciousness. Disenchanted, he becomes dispassionate. Through dispassion, he is fully released. With full release, there is the knowledge, 'Fully released.' He discerns that 'Birth is ended, the holy life fulfilled, the task done. There is nothing further for this world.' - Anatta-lakkhana Sutta

No thanks. You are not my type.

If you are not accurate, who cares how quickly you get it out.

I notice that the coach mentioned nothing about Trent's accuracy.

Since Buddhism is older than Christianity, does it make it more credible?

So, how many more people are going to respond without reading the links and without reading the thread to know that this is fake?

HFBD bastages!!

They were hidden in the thread titled "Compensatory Picks."

deja vu

What makes it even worse, is that the those same people who refuse to do their own research on the older players also disparage the people who take the time to do said research. Therefore, the older players will never get their due.

Those lists are pretty much a joke. Regardless of the position they are covering, they have absolutely no clue. They are all skewed towards the recent players, because actually researching players who played before 1985 is too hard. You are seeing the same thing with the HOF. The older reporters are retiring and the newer guys have no clue.

Pwned in his own thread. That has to suck.

After all that daring, triple dog daring and quadruple dog daring, I expected an awsome thread. I open this up and...meh. It was underwhelming and a big disappointment. A very weak attempt by Mr. EC.

Is this all you got? I am disappointed. I expected better.

[Yawn] Uh-huh [/Yawn]

That would be great.

I'm not worried. I already know he won't.

Not only do I triple dog dare you, I quadruple dog dare you. Bring it, tough guy.

You don't have the cajones to do it.

I double dare you.

Agreed, if they let anybody look at it.

I'm not buying a paver.

There are only a couple of ways to get that kind of stuff. First, get friendly with your local football historian. Sometimes, they have that kind of stuff in their personal archives. If not, they might know someone who does. Next, get friendly with the people at the Hall of Fame Research Library. They have a lot of game films there. Unfortunately, you are probably not going to see any historical stuff coming out of NFL Films in the near future. You could see the trend, as you mentioned, since ESPN Classic was taken off the air and replaced with NFL Network. NFL Network's version of "Classic" is anything around 2004.

That is pretty much correct. There is an extremely devoted segment of the population who loves that stuff, but all you have to do is look at this board to see that the majority of posters couldn't care less about anything that happened prior to about 2000. Hence, all of the "Classic" games they have been playing have been 2003 or later, except for the Bills-Oilers playoff in 1992. There are ways to view films of old games (not from NFL Films, since they refuse to open their vaults ), but it is not the easiest thing to do.

It was an unwarranted attack. He should be banned.