Ya that is true.
One game sticks out to me about the ravens though. Against CLE on that crazy monday nighter, they played a lot of coverage as they didn't matchup well with the browns receivers as I believe they had a corner or 2 hurt.
Now they got burned by it so maybe they will change.
But they did show they will play coverage if they don't think they can matchup well 1 on 1 with only 1 high safety
Could be rush 4/5, man to man with 1 or 2 safeties.
That would be my guess as i think they'll mix that game plan.
I don't see them blitzing 6 plus guys very often
I can’t see Baltimore blitzing heavy.
I know that’s what they do and that’s their strength.
But they would be asking for big trouble if they give the bills a lot of cover 1/cover 0
Was there any word from Mcd or Daboll on mckenzie?
Just weird he only had 4 snaps.
Not sure if that was due to his ankle injury, or just the way the Colts were playing on defence.
Baker Looks a lot better, but I still think he’s a product of stefanski/the run Game.
Put him in Allen’s shoes with no run game, and I think he struggles mightily
Easiest QB jobs in the NFL?
Tannehill, Baker.
We saw today when the run game doesn’t work how much tannehill can struggle.
While baker has made great strides this year , I feel the same for him, as he goes when the run game goes.
1 minute left in the 3rd.
If you don’t get it. It’s a 13 pt game. What’s the difference between a 12 and 13 point game... lol
If you get it, it makes all the difference in the game .
Risk/reward sir. The reward was way higher to go for it