The Dean
-
Posts
26,415 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by The Dean
-
-
Kelly Holcomb has been playigng well, but this season is not happening. We need to develop Losman. Troy Aikman was talkign abotu this and was mentioning that he was 0-11 until they won their first game and went 1-15 his first year. He said things didn't gel until just into his second season as a starter. So where will this leave us with JP? If he is indeed the future, when is that future- 3 years from now? look at Eli Manning- he went through his growing pains. Kelly played in the USFL for two years before we got him. This is merely pushing back JPs development.
Where were YOU Sunday?
BTW, I agree as long as we RUN...RUN...RUN. If we stick with KH, we should RUN...RUN...RUN
-
What does "players coach" mean? Belicheck is a "player's coach"..no? I don't hear players complaining about playing for him. Parcells must be the ULTIMATE player's coach. He brings the same players with him from team-to-team. Coughlin is not a player's coach...he's a douchebag. But as he has ZERO SuperBowl appearances I guess that's not the answer.
WHAT is a "Player's coach"?
My guess is "no nonsense".
-
Care to throw up in your mouth a bit? Have a read.
I started reading...and had to stop. My blood pressure is high lately
-
According to the President (ex President?) of the San Francisco Bay Area Bills Backers (or some such nonsense):
"He leaves the other "d" on the field"
Please don't give that line to ESPN!
-
Thank you, thank you, thank you!
-
-
The Raiders loss was a worse loss...no effort, we sucked. The Pats loss was more impt...same division and all. To me the Pat's loss felt worse as we blew the game. We had it and blew it. I'm still pissed.
-
I'm no expert (talk to Bill in NYC and John from Hemet)...but from what I saw he looked darn good. But, of we use him at tackle, won't this cut into his time at QB, CB, DT and Safety?
-
Nascar News:
Driver makes right turn. Massive crash. Many dead.
-
-
Had a feeling this thread would turn into me not being "educated" enough to "understand" the beauty of this film, but I can't imagine someone could watch this move for the first time today and find it either scary or entertaining. And isn't that the mark of a truly "great" film? The ability to stand the test of time?(ie Freaks, The Innocents, Psycho, The Shining, etc) This movie is just funny. I don't need million dollar special effects, but this movie is a laugher...
<<<>>>><<><vvvvvvvvvV
These <<<>>>>> are vvvvvv birds >>>>>>
<<<< they are<<<<< pecking you >>>>> vvvvvv
pecking your <<<<>>>> head <<<<<<<<
pecking your >>>>><<<<<eyes vvvvvv
Pretty scary, no?
NO?
Here's bigger birds VVVVVVVVVVVVV pecking your head VVVVVVVVV
-
-
As far as composition, they both balance the eye well, "grove" in particular.
However, make them both black and white and you could probably charge more. I think removing all color from "grove" would give it more character...you know, really enhance the stark contrast between tall/short, belonging/intruding. The color makes it too "happy" when you've named the piece "interupted," suggesting a break from conformity.
I really like the the light/dark/shadow aspect of "claw", and I think it also would stand out more by amplifying that opposition or contrast. The brutal aspect of an industrial object, somewhat softened by it obsolescence.
Just my 2 cents.
Deep
-
My buddy called me (drunk) at halftime from LA. He asked, "Dean, do we keep running in the second half, or is it time to put the ball up?" My response (surprise) was, "We keep running. The runs that didn't give us much in the first half will yeild yardage as the day goes on. Trust me, we're in the lead and need to RUN!"
Well, when we ran, I was right. Then the passes started...ugh.
-
THAT'S an unatural act, all right. Funny stuff
-
Did anyone else here that? That rivals the old "Giving him the business" call.
I was doing something (making drinks, I think) and I heard the ref say "commited an unatural act"...I immediately looked up and said , "What?"
I thought making he was screwing a dog out there, or something.
-
Trust me, it's not the formation/situation... it's the players. I'm so confident in that statement that I can honestly say you'd feel differently if the names were changed to protect the guilty. Decoding this garble...
You mean you really like this formation if the names in that formation/situation are kelly, thermal, reed, wolford, ritcher, hull, ballard, Davis, Metzallars, Beebe and Lofton.
But those AREN'T the players...and teams have succeded with the level of talent we have (at least have gone into the playoffs). The coaches are supposed to put their players in situations where they are likely to succed. Given the strengths and weaknesses of the hand they have been dealt, the formations, playcalling, etc, is perfectly legitimate conversation here, methinks.
(methinks?)
-
I don't have a problem with Williams as the third down back. My main beef is when it's 3rd and 2, and we lineup in shotgun formation (with or without a RB). I hate that, as we rarely run the ball in shotgun. 3rd and 6, fine, but 3rd and short shouldn't be shotgun formation in my mind.
CW
You got it. We clear the backfield FAR too many times. When there's nobody in the backfield except the QB, the D is immediatly relieved from the responsibility of even THINKING about the run. When we have an RB he's already in motion...wide before the snap.
I don't get that.
-
Nice pics. Dunno how big the prints are, or what the venue is like, or what the average $ of the other pics is..WO with that said, here is my advice re:pricing:
Charge MORE...maybe 5 or 6 times more. (Or, say, twice the average price of the pics at the gallery.) A higher price will make them seem even better and will create more buzz and mystique.
If I'm wrong, you're out $90...and you still have the pics. You'll sell em somewhere else. If I'm right, you'll have some nice coin in your pocket and you'll have set a higher baseline for your work going forward.
-
What cost us the game was the inexplicable decision to attempt to PASS when we were ahead in the 4th Q and the run was working. We didn't learn our lesson in the 3rd Q when we threw the pick, did we. NO! Instead of working the clock with a constant diet of Willis, he had to put KH in a position to fail. RJUN, RUN, RUN, RUN, RUN!
-
Looks like another position for Peters!
-
Were you drunk when you posted this last night? Or, are you just naturally a braid-dead idiot?
Inquiring minds don't give a rat's-ass!
-
-
A 55 yard pass is completed to Moulds; after that play not one pass attempt over 5 yards. With 4 and 7 the coward at quarterback throws a 4 yard pass; because he is such a friggin coward he is afraid of getting hit. Put anybody at QB, but cut this chicken sh-- coward Holcomb today
My Mid-Season Report Card
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
As far as the explanation: Best I've heard...although I don't think that's how it's NORMALLY used...it's how it SHOULD be used. Good Job!