Seeing as your main point is that it was intended to target minorities from the beginning, I don't know how that can be true.
So which is it? Do the reasons black community lobbyists wanted it matter? Is this what "they" wanted in the first place?
You don't have to read it. Everyone is a big talker when it comes to Rex. They all say they'd die for him. But watching some of their games, it doesn't appear as though the roster is "fighting" for Rex.
Do you you understand the difference between an FA and a player under contract?
You seem to be arguing that Tyrod is annoyed (without a shred of evidence that he is) that Brock Osweiler is hitting FA market before him. Even though Tyrod signed a contract with escalators and benefits if he won the starting job. Even though Tyrod knew that there was a possibility he would be perhaps underpaid for the duration of his contract. Even though he knew he had to "prove it" to get a big deal.
Tyrod knows all this to be true.
Tyrod signed that deal, and he already has had a year voided, no?
I don't see Tyrod holding out, so him being disgruntled means little. It's a leap to sign him early so he isn't potentially a little annoyed. Like, a huge leap.
It's a major reason why I still don't see the whole team buying in again next year. Mario may have been the most obvious insurbordinate but he wasn't the only one. Dareus is another high on that list, and he isn't so easily cast aside.
Your 5 reasons essentially boiled down to need at S, not at CB.
I think it's still pretty essential. Especially when WR's move around. Less essential than CB1? Probably. But not by much.
You also have to factor in the depth. Do you want a slow CB having to guard a TY Hilton type if someone misses time?
My point is that Mario Williams is not the first nor the last player or even superstar to not go above and beyond on a single play. It was a poor example of him quitting.