FireChan

You still haven't shown me how it's possible. Stop conflating. None of the rest matters. His "point," is irrelevant. His "case," is irrelevant. His "leverage," is nowhere where you think it is. He has no cards. If he holds out, he risks sucking next year. Good luck with that TT.

No, there's not. Show me how we can give him the money he wants in '16. Cut Gilmore, Kyle, Hughes and trade Sammy? It's ridiculous. He can't be paid. He signed up for this. He will deal with it or demand a trade.

Because we can't extend him. He'd be hurting himself without a chance of it "working." He may have some good cards, but we're already all in. We can't go in more.

Found the link. Damn Badol. http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/topic/163230-marquise-goodwin-vs-tj-graham-fan-poll/?p=2961890

Harvin. I need a link to that topic.

Don't worry gator. I'll just wait.

Okay. I'll wait for you to post a peaceful article the next time a Republican or wealthy person does something bad, just to remind us the vast majority are good guys.

Is that even a thought?

I commented because it's out of the media playbook. It happens every terrorist attack. Remember the fake Muslim security guard in Paris? Remember how "little play" it got? Moron. Enjoy following the rest of the formula. http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2016/03/a-terrorist-attack-has-happened-in-europe-let-the-standard-response-begin/

I can only imagine what his reactions to "rich guy acts unethically, but these other rich guys donate to charity" stories are like. I'm sure he's consistent.

To hate? What does that story have to do with the terrorist attack? Nothing. I loved the "this won't get a lot of play," BS too, by the way. Just like every headline that story has.

Quick, find a feel good story after every terrorist attack! Right out of the playbook.

Does everyone realize this was a playoff game with high schoolers? These aren't 10 year olds. The games matter more. Maybe this team was practicing running new parts of their offense for their next game. We have no idea. I see no reason to think there was any malice.

Well, he's crushing the primaries. We shall see how it all plays out.

Is the goal to campaign while not sounding like a buffoon according to GG or just getting the most votes? If they are both stupid, but one sounds stupider, there isn't a true difference in substance, just presentation. There's no effective difference. So who cares?

Because it's just as stupid if the end goal is to prevent Islamic terrorist attacks in the US. If they have any sophistication, they'll get through. Banning "Syrians" won't change that.

That doesn't make me a supporter. Are we using your special brand of logic again?

A Trump supporter? See this is your problem. Saying dumb things. Because not all terrorists are Syrian refugees/masquerading as refugees, just like not all terrorists and their associates are Muslims. Both are efforts in futility.

Yet again? Maybe you're confused. Originally, you said: Then it got fuzzy. You said that not all Islamic extremists are followers of Islam. I said that they aren't all from war-torn regions. Your non-"carney" response was just as stupid of a blanket statement, which is why I went after it. You said something as stupid as the Donald while commenting on how stupid he is. Be less stupid.

Proximity.

Don't cite any kind of logic in that abortion of a post. I didn't call them innocents, not guilty, or to "release them." I said they didn't kill anyone directly and that's true. I said we don't know anything about them. Both things are barriers to a blanket ban, mostly because we have no info on them and they haven't committed any direct acts of terror out in the open. If your idea of "following logic" makes that an argument in support of freeing Khaled, it may be time to go back your safe space.

Yes, because freeing them and not imposing blanket-wide bans against people we don't know a single thing about is the same. This is embarrassing.

Sympathizers and collaborators who haven't killed a single person directly. What religion did Farook follow?

Did you just tell me that not all Islamic terrorists are Muslim?

Merely taking advantage of the idiots seems too unpredictable to maintain control for over a decade, as you indicated.