Kemp

If that is accurate, it will come out in the Mueller investigation, so let's wait and see.

I am unclear about your point but would appreciate links to your various points so I could evaluate them. Thank you in advance. Another homosexual reference from this team of thought. Pattern is certainly intriguing. Wonder why. Coincidence? Self-loathing?

"Manafort has nothing to do with Trump". Campaign managers have nothing to do with the person who is running for office? We KNOW that the Trump Tower meeting was an attempt to get dirt on Clinton from Russia and that one of the attendees did work for Putin and his buddies. Isn't it funny that when some people get angry about a discussion, they go to homosexual references?

www.google.com/amp/s/www.theringer.com/platform/amp/2018/4/11/17224760/josh-allen-cleveland-browns-analytics-nfl-draft

You tap danced. Why can't Trump fire Mueller directly if the Executive branch is in control of the situation? Clinton could not fire Starr. If he could have, he would have. Maybe he just didn't feel like firing him? Someone who states that Trump is currently under no duress and calls me an idiot is funny stuff. I would think that even his most ardent supporters would understand that when a special prosecutor is investigating you and filing charges against your employees, that would qualify as duress. Trump sure acts like he is experiencing pressure, much like anyone else would under his circumstances. Nixon and Clinton were under duress when they went through their investigations. Right? What is different this time in terms of duress? Even if Trump is deemed innocent of everything, he still will have been put through enormous duress. That's not true?

Why is it that vast majority of people who use analytics agree with me and not you? You understand it better than the prevailing opinion? Based on your view of analytics, where would Allen fall in this years QB class and why?

The same qualities that he had in college will now magically become enhanced when the defenses get much bigger, faster, stronger, and better. Sounds like a plan.

People keep saying Allen has the most upside of the group. Upon what is this based?

Someone else posted the link. Pay attention. I guess I shouldn't be surprised that you don't understand the difference between government structure and the administration. If there was no difference, this would be a dictatorship. It's common knowledge (apparently not universal) that the President cannot fire Robert Mueller. He can fire the attorney general, try and get a new one in there (no certain thing) and the new attorney general can fire Mueller. If you're going to call someone an idiot, it's best to understand that you don't understand how the process works.

They all lie, but as I have already pointed out in my posted list, the lies of Trump and his dwarf anything in the last 50 years. There are always BIG lies. The question is why Trump keeps making up little lies when he doesn't need to and it becomes comical when he disagrees with himself a day later. Trump has been stealing from the private sector for years and getting away with it. He never wanted to be President. He wanted to lose and start a media empire. It would have made him so much money. His winning cost him. Now he's continued his previous ways in the White House, but there's too much scrutinizing where he is and it's causing his world to crash down upon himself. I doubt he finishes his term, whether it's because of outside pressure or his own decision to jump ship. He should jump ship and start a media empire. All of his followers will follow him and believe whatever he says and that would make him far more powerful than he is now. The problem is that it might be too late, because Mueller's investigation probably has enough to take him down, today.

If your mayor put in a bulletproof desk and a cone of silence telephone booth, at the taxpayer's expense, you would consider that a worthwhile expenditure? After I point out the endless lies and frauds, you are left only with calling me dishonest. I gave you facts. You didn't like them so you threw a tantrum. I can't help it that your team has taken corruption to a new level. It's sad and pathetic that no matter what some do you will support them. That's how fascism starts. Seems like you'd be more comfortable with that, so hope it succeeds. You are making the same mistake as Trump. The Justice Department is not part of any administration. Otherwise, Clinton would never have been impeached and Trump would not currently be in hot water.

As far as I know, there is no posted data for the current administration, yet. I guess we'll see who gets counted against who. I'm amazed that Pruitt hasn't been indicted, yet, with all of his shenanigans, although he certainly needed to have a bulletproof desk. Imagine the outrage if Hillary won and one of her administration had done a third of what Pruitt has done.

Kind of like when Obama was elected and similar sorts couldn't handle it. The big difference is the number of scandals. Wonder if Trump can catch Nixon?

Since you can't dispute them, I suppose you are left with no other choice. You and Trump think he's the King of America.

Truth and falsehoods are not subjective. I give you his lies after they are requested and you have to change the topic because you cannot dispute that they are lies. A two-dollar whore? Don't get your hopes up. I guess we'll find out when it's concluded. In the meantime, don't worry about it so much.

Context must mean that you don't like bad results, so let's look for other reasons for failure. His stats are horrific. Those who think he will be a good NFL QB believe so because he can throw it through a brick wall and because of his physique. Is there another reason? He had the same arm and physique in college. You might turn out to be right, but I like my reasons for success/failure better than yours. Hopefully, you're right.

Truth and facts are bull****? Orwellian times. This probably is reasonable thought to you: "I was provided with additional input that was radically different from the truth. I assisted in furthering that version." -Colonel Oliver North, from his Iran-Contra testimony"

Josh Allen was the 73rd ranked passer in college, last season.

That's fair. I have no idea as to who did what illegally, here, but the notion that you have better info than Trump supporters in power doesn't ring true to me, and we know if they had what you say you have, it would bump Trump off of the front pages. Let's assume you are right. If you have access to this proof, it will come out from better connected people than yourself. Again, all we can do is watch this play out. Granted, we don't always find out all truths, but even though our system sucks, it's still better than some others. It's also far more corrupt than most people understand or are willing to admit. I still think we are better off with a corrupt system than with an even more corrupt system, headed by a pathological liar/criminal. I know he TRIED to collude. I don't know whether he was successful. My guess would be yes because of what we know about Stone and Manafort. No idea if votes were altered, but it is believed that some states had attempts to break into their systems. I also believe that even if we KNEW that votes were tampered with that we would not be told because it would cause utter chaos and a possible civil war. That Trump and the Republicans absolutely refuse to try and increase security for the next election seems damning to me, though.

You really don't get it, do you? The crime isn't called "collusion", but collusion can be an umbrella for a host of felonies.

T or F? JAN. 21 “I wasn't a fan of Iraq. I didn't want to go into Iraq.” (He was for an invasion before he was against it.) T or F? JAN. 23 “Between 3 million and 5 million illegal votes caused me to lose the popular vote.” (There's no evidence of illegal voting.) T or F? JAN. 25 “Take a look at the Pew reports (which show voter fraud.)” (The report never mentioned voter fraud.) T or F? JAN. 25 “So, look, when President Obama was there two weeks ago making a speech, very nice speech. Two people were shot and killed during his speech. You can't have that.” (There were no gun homicide victims in Chicago that day.) I can post enough of these lies to fill up pages, here. Want to dispute any of these, for starters? He makes things up out of ether. The funny thing is you know this to be true.

Everyone on the planet lies to some degree and while Clapper and Brennan most certainly lie, what we are currently experiencing in terms of the amount of lying by the folks in power is unprecedented. You can't possibly know who and what is behind any of this. None of us do. Eventually we will find out. Hopefully. If it turns out that Trump is guilty of very serious crimes, my fear is that it won't matter to many, because of the narrative being pushed from the top. If that scenario takes place, we are done. If he is exonerated, he will end up the most maligned man in American history, and his supporters will endlessly tell us that, and deservedly so. It's wait and see time. It's not time to say there is nothing to see here.

There is usually not proof of anything revealed to the public in a criminal prosecution until the case is presented. I have no idea if there was collusion. The only thing we know is that an attempt at collusion was made. We don't know whether it was successful. There is no law against collusion, anyway. In either case, this will most likely become a money-laundering prosecution. We'll all have to wait to see how it plays out Preparing an insanity defense.

1. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/06/23/opinion/trumps-lies.html 2. No one gives a crap about Trump's sexual exploits, either.