Jauronimo
-
Posts
14,839 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Jauronimo
-
-
We must squish the fish!
Dolphin technically mammal...
Shut the f@#$ up nerd!
-
26 minutes ago, chris heff said:
It was a joke, Hawes did go to Yale. When Fitz was Bills QB, announcers couldn’t get out a paragraph without mentioning he went to Harvard. There was an also a Bills player whose name I can’t recall, who was Malone’s son. Announcers would always point it out.
That was Demetress "Don't Call Me Demetrius" Bell.
Another fun fact, Hawes was actually an accomplished lacrosse player at Yale and wears wedding rings on both hands when he plays despite being an eligible bachelor.
-
1
-
2
-
1
-
-
21 hours ago, Victory Formation said:
He gets his first nose surgery, then before you know it then it’s Botox and lip injections, then it goes all downhill from there..
Tom Brady won 4 super bowls after hair plugs, cheek fillers, a nose job, and chin reduction.
-
1
-
-
If James Franklin had any sense these first 3 PSU games would have been treated as an extension of practice with the only intent of developing an actual passing game. Instead they proved once again that they can run the ball all over 3rd rate programs. They aren't going to be able to run all over Ohio State and they can't even pass for first downs against the Villanovas, Nevadas, and Florida Institutes of Fashion of the FBS. They remain abysmally bad on 3rd down even while playing inferior opponents. Aller is not progressing at all. Once considered a first round draft pick hes not even a top five QB anymore.
-
Winless this season
About to be 0 and 3
Coach will not survive
-
2 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said:
I think the only teams that I would say I'm feeling Giants and Raiders.
Everyone else, it's going to be a battle for them.
The Raiders gave them more trouble than other divisional opponents in recent years. This is a different Raiders team but Maxx Crosby means Mahomes is in for a long day. He makes it a point to touch Mahomes and get in his ear on every play. We will see, but that division looks to be getting more competitive while ours may be the worst in football.
-
Chiefs first half schedule is tough. They could realistically be 0.500 when we see them in Buffalo.
Chargers 0 - 1
Eagles 0 - 2
Next Up:
Giants
Ravens
Jags
Lions
Raiders
Commanders
Bills
-
2
-
-
Saw Oasis two weeks ago, Nelly with Ja Rule a week ago (not my choice), and Nine Inch Nails on Friday which was amazing and the best of the three shows by a mile. Last up on the docket is Viagra Boys October 30th.
-
I'm a fan of what this place has produced.
https://www.fingerlakesciderhouse.com/
The dry, more champagne like ciders made in the european style are excellent.
-
1 minute ago, Fan in Chicago said:
(You all will love this thread on victory Monday)
Seeing how we well we are playing now, that we get a couple of defensive players back in few weeks and assuming that the young 'uns on defense gel by mid-season, I am having a really tough time seeing a loss on our schedule. But we all know how difficult it is to go unbeaten. Also, I dont want to jinx it. So if we assume there will be at least one loss this season, which game has your vote?
Dolphins - naah
Saints - no QB, still re-building
Patriots* - Maybe if Vrabel does his thing for playing tough in the trenches and this is his Superbowl
Falcons - way too underpowered to slow us down
Panthers - Naah
Chiefs - they should have Rice back by this time so it is likely but I feel we are more balanced overall on Defense and can avoid the typical issues with their offense
Dolphins - they will be thinking about next season at this time, so naah
Buccaneers - a possible loss as they are a tough team and on a good day, can give us fits
Texans - while good overall, it remains to be seen if CJ Stroud can recapture his rookie form. But I dont think they have the overall horses to stop us
Steelers - Again, could be a tough game but Rodgers' arm would be hurting by this time
Bengals - Maybe Burrow will be back by this time but he will be rusty and our Defense should be fully revved up by this time
Patriots - see above
Browns - good overall team but still looking for a QB.
Eagles - first real possibility of a loss with how tough that team is. But if we have the #1 seed locked up, many of our starters will be resting
Jets - rrriigght
So, in summary, I think our first loss could be to the Patriots, Bucs or Eagles.
What do y'all think?
Its a long season. Teams adjust. Playing at this level all year isn't realistic. If history is any indicator, somewhere around week 5 the wheels will suddenly come off and we will be looking completely out of answers for a few weeks.
-
5
-
1
-
-
I think we had too many starters on defense in week 1.
-
4
-
-
Just now, JDHillFan said:
But drag shows is the thing that reeled you in? Fascinating.
Reeled me into what?
-
1 hour ago, boyst said:
I'd have to read the exact dialogue to believe this. @Jauronimo do you know what he is talking about?
I do know what he's talking about. He was ranting and raving about the equivalent of litter boxes in school bathrooms and drag shows for kids which he believes to be the major issues of our time. With all the actual issues facing the nation I cannot be bothered to care about every bit of rage bait he can scrounge up from the depths of the internet. And NC believes he scored a major victory that day in my dismissal of his Libs of Tik Tok smoking gun.
-
2 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:
Who?
You may recognize some names in this thread. You really haven't seen any of the cancel culture rants here in PPP over the years? I spend maybe single digit hours a year on this board and I've seen plenty of it. Hardly limited to this thread.
-
2 minutes ago, CoudyBills said:
You condemned cancel culture. There has to be accountability. We are on the verge of civil war, closer than at anytime in our lives. We'll be burying brothers, sisters, fathers, mothers. Is that preferable to cancel culture?
I did not. But a bunch of guys reveling in today's canceling certainly have done so.
-
2
-
-
55 minutes ago, Tenhigh said:
I think you may want to edit and clarify what you mean here.
What is there to clarify? Yikes.
-
54 minutes ago, AlCowlingsTaxiService said:
You’d be way too stupid to work for me if you felt the need to post this garbage … buh bye
I'm not looking for a pay cut but...thanks?
-
Just now, AlBUNDY4TDS said:
You condemn the people who cheer his death while being mad at these same people for being outed.
We all have to draw a line. I draw it at cheering on someone's murder. If you deem these people getting outed as cancel culture fine.
I don't agree.
Why do you cry outrage when monsters are outed?
You call it cancel culture, I call it having common sense. I don't want these monsters in my community holding positions of power, interacting with children.
I'm not mad at those doing the outing or those celebrating the outing. I pointed out what sure looks like a double standard and some of you are taking it rather personally.
It is cancel culture. Definitionally. If you celebrate cancel culture today maybe think twice before ranting about how bad it is tomorrow. Seems like a reasonable ask to me.
Or if you want play on both sides of the fence on this issue as its convenient, just own it like NC.
-
1 minute ago, ScotSHO said:
“I know you are, but what am I?” - Pee Wee Herman
28 minutes ago, ScotSHO said:Flawless Jauranamooo logic -> Misgendering a tranny = killing people.
You expect me to reply to this nonsense with what exactly? How much of my time and attention do believe your childish baiting and insults deserve?
-
Just now, ScotSHO said:
No rebuttal, as I figured.
Just remember, when you post your precious football opinions in the future, I’ll know it was written by a deranged goof. That will hurt you more than anything I could tell to your face. Not that you’d share your goofy position in real life.
You just responded to my rebuttal. Do you smell toast?
-
1 minute ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said:
You took the word salad way out.
Sad.
Boxed in huh?
You have multiple times responded to my substantive posts over the past few days with some form of "thats a word salad" which is a total cop out. Beyond weak.
You introduced a false choice in your previous post between some "semi controversial" hypothetical and public celebrations of death. I'm not taking the bait and letting you advance your own definitions of terms and degrees of controversy, as that is an obvious and underhanded way to debate.
I attempted to have an adult conversation with you in good faith, and predictably my efforts were in vain.
-
3 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said:
Do you think making semi controversial comments is different than cheering on the death of someone you disagreed with?
Cancel culture does apply to one of these above examples.
I don't know what "semi controversial" comments you are referring to or who deemed them only "semi controversial". Further, I don't know how this hypothetical of "semi controversial" opinions is even relevant. It is obvious that you are advancing a highly flexible and personally convenient definition of what cancel culture entails. Luckily, for us we don't need to debate the meaning of the term cancel culture as it has already been established.
-
Just now, ScotSHO said:
Flawless Jauranamooo logic -> Misgendering a tranny = killing people.
This is an impressive meltdown. I think you haven't even approached bottom yet. How much lower can you go, I wonder?
-
Just now, AlBUNDY4TDS said:
I literally just described why it's not.
Violating company policy is not cancel culture.
Damn dude.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cancel_culture
Definitionally, it is cancel culture. Social media outrage, citizens reporting people for their transgressions, calling for firings. The only difference between this example of cancel culture and thousands of others is that this time you're the one who is outraged rather than the one defending free speech.
It's Miami week! HAIKUUUUU
in The Stadium Wall
Posted
Eeee eEe click-click,
chirp click-whistle-EeEeEe,
eeee pop-pop-click f@#$!