Wayne Cubed

Ahhh ok, so not APs OROY and DROY.

The Dez Bryan catch the ground caused him to lose control. It completely did touch the ground, that’s the whole point of the rule. The ball can move it just can’t touch the ground. Watch the Dez play again, he stretches out with one hand and as he’s coming down the ball bounces off the ground, it moves. That’s why they said incomplete. If it moved in his hand but never touched the ground, it’s a catch. This all comes from not establishing yourself as a runner yet. Because if you did, the ground can’t cause a fumble. Here look:

Wasnt as bad as the PI that happened earlier in the game, the defender had Jones(?) wrapped up before the ball was even close to getting there. Trapped his arm too. Those calls shouldn’t be missed in a playoff game.

Yea moved in his hands and touched the ground. The problem with the Jesse J catch to me was that his forearm was on the ground and you literally couldn’t see if it touched the ground. Yes the ball moved but the ball can move as long as you regain control and it doesn’t touch the ground in doing so.

Thats because they believe it touched the ground. Which you can’t use the ground to complete the catch. I dont think there was an actual shot showing it touch the ground though.

I think it’s inconclusive, so you’d have to stay with the call on the field. Yes it looks like the ball moves and his left hand definitley comes off the ball. What I can’t tell is, if he gets his right hand under the ball. It starts on top when he first makes the catch. I don’t think it’s possible he gets it underneath in time but I’m making an assumption. This is what should have happened with the KB catch.

Riveron is certainly different from his predecessors. Just from watching games around the league he seems much more comfortable overturning calls.

I think it’s the frame by frame analysis. Replay was intended to overturn obvious mistakes not break a catch down frame by frame. They need to go back to staying with the call on the field unless it’s obvious.

Sorry have to disagree. Watch the ball, it bounces into his chest. His right hand starts on top of the ball, there no way he gets in underneath. The left hand clearly comes off the ball. I think it’s inconclusive, so technically Riveron got it right this time.

Right, ok.

Apparently you have trouble reading. Let me help, better than expected does not mean in love with. In fact it’s kind of a back handed compliment. There was no “love” there and there is no word on the street that it’s intensified, that’s just in your head.

Beanes in love with a QB he didn’t draft? Do you actually believe the stuff you make up? Dunkirk Don>>>>>>>>>SaviorPeterman

You can’t seem to get the yardage right. The Bills were on the 3 yard line, not near the goaline or the 1 or 2. The 3 yard line. If they went for it on 4th, it’s possibly they also lose yardage. You know that did happen in the game right? And the Jags drove 86 yards on their TD drive... so if the Bills lost yardage on their attempted 4th down or threw a pick, it’s possible the Jags could have drove and scored points. Hindsight is a lovely thing and you sir are assuming all the best possible outcomes.

Is that the same Jags team that did move the ball and score a FG and a TD? But you must obviously have known that in this hypothetical situation they weren’t going to.

Basically at the goaline, they were st the 3 yard line. That’s not basically at the goal line.

What? How do you know where the Bills would have gotten the ball back? You’re assuming an awful lot. He’s a solution that doesnt involve assuming you’ll get the ball back at the 50. You take the 3 points. This isn’t the Pats where you need to keep TB off the field.

So, you’ve determined they would have easily got a FG before the half, even though they didn’t get close enough to get another one before the half? Are you seriously suggesting that? Why wasn’t it 6-3 before the half, the Bills were actually more aggressive and came out throwing when it was 3-0?

I’m not sure I follow, a limited offense should go for it and not take points when they can against another team with a limited offense? so they should play for the 0-0 tie?

Yea of course, just don’t call an RPO and that solves it.

I don’t think it’s on Tyrod as much, because I believe he’s just suppose to read the defense and if he sees one-on-one on the outside he’s suppose to pass. Dennison calling that RPO on first down is the mistake. Also, people are upset it didn’t work and resulted in a penalty. Shouldn’t you be upset with KB for pushing off? If it just goes incomplete, the Bills have a better chance at running the ball on 2nd.

Wasn’t a fade though. It was a come back and KB pushed off, which he didn’t need to. I know more people are pissed at Tyrod, but they should be just as upset with KB for pushing off. Also Dennison should have just called a run there, save that play for 2nd or 3rd down.

In this game, with it being a defensive battle, it was the right call. Take the points. If he’s playing a high scoring offense like the Pats, you go for it. The wrong decision was using a TO there, take the penalty and save your TO in case you get the ball back.

What? Try to keep up. its an RPO, run-pass-option. Tyrod has the decision and only he knows what he’s going to do. Dennison simply has to NOT call an RPO there and call a run play. That doesn’t limit the play calling so I’m not exactly sure what you mean.

Jags punt inside Bills territory, drink.

No he’s guilty of calling a play that allows his QB to pass. How is it difficult to understand, if he doesn’t call it and the play is called a run, guess what? Tyrod doesn’t throw there.