Jump to content

dayman

Community Member
  • Posts

    6,098
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by dayman

  1. There is a political narrative...that America is basically under attack and a big part of that is the evils of the United Nations...certain political movements position themselves as the "defenders of America from this evil encroachment"...so in voting no to harmless treaty that merely affirms our support of an international effort to address the disabled influenced by our own longstanding ADA they preserve their brand equity for the retards they "defend" from foreign invasion ... that is all this was. Political stupidity...not policy not anything logical or legitimate just pandering and messaging to the lowest of the low. Sorry RK but those "fears" you think they were fixated on are not real and they know it...and Tasker would like this vote to somehow be about the evils of the UN in general b/c of course he buys the nonsense hook line and sinker...this little vote was about showing our support to bettering the lives of disabled people worldwide that is all...
  2. LOL it's not a beachhead against anything it's just a large amount of gutless senators voting no out of political fear plain and simple...
  3. Those members of Congress are idiots playing to the unfounded fears of idiot voters. This is not even a big deal, it was basically a symbolic showing of our support for international accommodation....but even such a trivial matter cannot be accomplished b/c the GOP is insane now. Nothing, absolutely nothing in this little piece of paper was going to change US law.
  4. CEDE MA SOVEREIGNTY! Haha...this treaty ceded no sovereignty. Nada. They just voted "no" b/c people like you think it would and then may primary them.
  5. going to take your 'merica away from you?
  6. grammar on a message board <insert>wtfsmiley</insert>
  7. I have not heard anyone except you point to the rushed passage before the war ending as being speculation
  8. On 60 minutes he said he purposefully did not release it until after the election to avoid assumptions such as that.
  9. I'm not buying that it is mere theory that the basic story of the passage quickly before war is made up...seems pretty logical and while I don't know much about the history behind it I accept it as history and thus now make it history
  10. sparring with Tasker over QE...hehe...hope you love it as much as he does or else he'll win this war of attrition
  11. I would go ahead and get rid of it. At the very least you could keep it for a certain level and then take it away for the "Cadillac" benefit plans (so to speak)
  12. Anyone amused that the GOP spent all summer saying Obama wants to cut Medicare and will hurt it and now weeks after the election they are complaining that Obama isn't cutting medicare enough?
  13. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/04/disability-treaty_n_2238181.html It does seem a bit ridiculous honestly.
  14. Just saying...as a political junkie which I think most of us are who regularly come here...this is would be a wildly entertaining campaign to watch. And I'm sure cable news organizations would love it to materialize to cover it in the most fantastically overblown way possible. http://www.politico.com/story/2012/12/ashley-judd-exploring-senate-run-84542.html
  15. Never heard Costas say he wanted guns outlawed...merely that the "gun culture" is retarded which it is. And ya I'm not sure what this whole "McNair deserved to die" thing is lol
  16. Jacket w/ no tie is the "private equity look"?!
  17. Moonwalk while covering. Back peddle at all times. Just do it quickly .
  18. Well we could still make playoffs to win out. When that isn't true...lose out.
  19. Well they threw at him all day. And since they are the Jags...they had no success. That said...lets wait until Brady tests him and see how that goes.
  20. We should just have PPP hash it all out
  21. Agreed generally although you act as if they're in the 11th hour of the negotiation and not the 1st....while it is technically the 11th hour of the sequester we all know it's the 1st hour of the negotiation
  22. I haven't been following it that closely but I have yet to here of any type of counter....it makes sense the Dems will be more specific early on with their tax desires (politically acceptable to them) and the repubs with the cuts (likewise)...then you counterbalance the two and whala
  23. Obama is sending out a tough first pitch. The Republicans are saying it's ridiculous and a non-starter which is there tough first pitch. Etc etc....people are surprised by this?
  24. Rob I want to order some original rational thoughts. How much do you charge? And can you create a link once they are created so I can source them when I use them on 3rd?
×
×
  • Create New...