While I understand that the AP did not have anything to do with voting, I do not necessarily agree with Cushing being on the ballot the second time around. There was a reason they polled the writers a second time - the winner failed a drug drug test at the beginning of the season. I can understand the AP wanting to stay neutral but I dont agree with it. My prerogative.
I would also love to know why many of the writers voted for Cushing again. I hope their reasoning will come to light soon because I just cannot fathom why. You have a way to tell the world that cheating is dishonorable and the embarrassment and stigma that results from being caught will stay with you for life. It would have been another lesson not just for Cushing but for other young athletes as well.
Suffice to say, I am disappointed in the voters. These writers are so quick to play up the news surrounded a cheating player, write about his lack of moral direction but refuse to do anything when given the power to send a message. I doubt it would've made a huge difference in the grand scheme of sport, but like voting every message counts.
Just so we're clear, my views bear no reflection on JW.