Jump to content

skibum

Community Member
  • Posts

    1,352
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by skibum

  1. That's cool! I work in the vegetable business and have met a few folks in my travels to CA who know the Allens, and always speak highly of the family. Personally, I think they may be late to the party with pistachios - everyone's growing them now, there seems to be a glut on the market, and the prices are diving. But I hope it works out for them! And I hope they have reliable access to water. It's scary talking to growers out there. They just keep drilling deeper and deeper.

  2. On 5/7/2023 at 11:41 AM, billsbackto81 said:

    Marshall Faulk

    I second that. I love me some Barry Sanders and Adrian Peterson toting the rock, but to pair with Josh, I would want nothing less than best receiving back ever.

     

    My second choice is Thurman (homer pick but justifiable), third is LT.

     

    My extreme homer pick is Fred Jackson. 

  3. I'm going with a soft 'no', because there were still a lot of great players on the board, and this was something of a luxury pick. Don't get me wrong, I like the player a lot, but he will have to make a pretty big impact for this to be a square deal. As with all draft picks, we don't know if that will pan out. 

    • Like (+1) 1
  4. I don't get it. How is anyone 'tipping' the picks? The draft is broadcast widely on national TV and there are dozens of options to follow along online and on the radio. And nobody outside the teams themselves knows the picks before they happen. We're all just sitting there waiting for picks to come - what difference does it make if I find out 5 seconds before my TV tells me? And who cares if you saw Roger Goodell do it or if it came in the Shoutbox? And if you don't have TV or internet service, then you gotta find out what the picks are somehow - might as well be here. And when is it OK to name a pick? Does one wait 5 minutes out of courtesy? I can't believe the things people get bent out of shape over!

    • Agree 3
    • Awesome! (+1) 3
    • Thank you (+1) 1
  5. 35 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

    First, it would depend on just how far we’re moving down. I don’t wanna move down to like the middle of the second round.
     

    Second, it would be what we were being compensated for to do the move

     

    Based on DraftTek trade values, Buffalo would expect to gain a mid 3rd to a high 4th, assuming they also get their trade partner's next pick after 27. That's also assuming it follows the most common draft day trade-up recipe. But it could be more if some other team has a guy they really want at 27. 

  6. 10 hours ago, ganesh said:

    I remember the one time McDermott took the play calling during half-time and it showed a different team...I hope we get the same....The main issue is that this team is dependent on generating pass rush by its front-four -  Groot, Basham, Epenesa and Oliver.   This group has been vastly underwhelming. 

    There will also be a guy named Miller back on the front four this year, FWIW. 

  7. With Beane and Company, it seems like just about every option is always on the table. They certainly don't always do what we expect they will do. I think they are very good at preparing options for all kinds of scenarios, and they are willing to commit to the decisions that come from that prep.

     

    If, when the time comes, they feel like they are in a better spot by trading down, then I'm sure that's what they'll do. 

×
×
  • Create New...