Jump to content

first_and_ten

Community Member
  • Posts

    2,080
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by first_and_ten

  1. 18 hours ago, Warriorspikes51 said:
    18 hours ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

    Don’t bother we’ll be screwed over

    Don’t bother we’ll be screwed over

     

    Like we have been this year? The league adjusts their picks to a third for Cincinnati even though Tremaine Edmonds signed for more money then the guy Cincy lost!! How does this make any sense? Pegula needs to call the league and demand the third that they are owed.

  2. On 2/7/2024 at 10:22 PM, Buffalo_Stampede said:

    One thing we don’t talk about is Diggs in elimination games. He sucks. 
     

    Why is everyone so afraid of the Diggs conversation? Diggs has been a great addition. Yes we’d be better with Justin Jefferson but we don’t have to validate the trade. Diggs was a great WR addition. But I’m not afraid to move on at this point. He’s not helping us win a championship when he disappears every elimination game. Let’s be real. It’s not going to get better as he ages. He’s got zero playoff TDs the last 3 years.

     

    Rip the bandaid off. 

     

    This might happen, but not sure of the salary cap implications if they move on.

    On 2/7/2024 at 10:35 PM, Shortchaz said:

    The chiefs disagree 

     

    It's hard to disagree with you, but if the Bills had a better offense in this playoff game, they win it, in my opinion. 

    • Disagree 1
  3. On 2/6/2024 at 12:20 PM, brianthomas said:

    saw this on twitter this morning & almost had a heart attack. Was curious how'd you all feel if this did happen

     

    Screenshot_1.jpg

    i dont hate the idea personally & the trade partner surely makes sense given the history. Ideally i'd like things to work with Diggs here. But a trade like this would be bold & likely one of the only ways we can get out of the contract, without really hurting ourselves in the process

      

    This would confirm to me that McDermott still thinks defense is the way to win in this league. Personally, I feel that you build around our great quarterback. 

  4. 23 hours ago, HamSandwhich said:

    I did see that and if it’s accurate, seems skeevy at best. Plausibility is a value statement, what was his denial about it? 

     

    As far as I can remember, he denied any wrongdoing and blamed the media. Yes, he blamed the media, lol

    And there's this:

     

    https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/brett-favre-still-refuses-to-repay-mississippi-730k-for-speaking-fees-he-had-no-legal-right-to/

  5. 6 hours ago, HamSandwhich said:

    Do anyone have a good article explaining what happened exactly here, that’s fair for each sides point of view? This one seems a bit biased and gives no idea as to Favres stance (I realize there have probably been articles ad nauseam).
     

    Question I have, was this willfully accepting money knowing it was not for this by Favre? Is there plausible deniability?  It may not matter to the law but would change my view on how I look at Favre.

     

    ESPN was one of the entities that were accused by Favre so they have a reason to paint this in a certain light. 

     

    There are text messages. There was a denial, but not plausible. He's truly a piece of garbage. 

  6. On 1/21/2024 at 2:34 PM, VW82 said:

    I did, and I thought it was extremely one-sided. Basically, the author set out to make a pro-Allen video where he emphasized areas where Josh looked good and handwaved or ignored completely areas where Josh did not. 

     

    He did the performance in losses comparison directly with Lamar only, not pointing out that Lamar had fewer losses and failing to point out Josh had way more turnovers in losses (12) than Lamar. The handwaving of the turnovers in general was weird. Because they didn't happen in the clutch, they don't matter?? Author also lumped turnovers in with sacks when looking at negative plays. How does that make sense?

     

    Even still, much of the pro-Josh stats the author illustrated were also pro-Purdy, Dak, and Mahomes. But those guys didn't get their OC fired. It's funny how we've all completely forgotten about that, and about Josh's early season struggles taking the easy play over the home run. This season was supposed to be about turning Josh into a pocket passer who didn't take as many hits. Turns out Josh needs those designed runs to be elite. Are we supposed to pretend like the Jets, Pats, and Broncos games didn't happen?

     

    So really, his case is mostly about TDs. A good portion of his rushing TDs would have gone to a RB on any other team. We lost Harris early and Cook is small, and so we elected to start giving it to Josh inside the 10. He deserves credit for that but a lot of those TDs are just canabalizing RB production. They're goosing his numbers. Purdy also has goosed numbers playing with elite weapons, but his statistical profile this year was one of the greatest seasons OF ALL TIME.

     

    Josh definitely deserved to be in the top 5 for MVP given his overall production, but you have to handwave so much to get him to #1 imo.   

     

    I'll ask you this question. Would you rather have Lamar or Josh? Also, I think it's very unfair to say that Josh got his OC fired. Is it just possible that Dorsey got himself fired? Also, Josh didn't need to be turned into a pocket passer. He has already shown that ability. The part about not taking as many hits was encouraging him to slide or get out of bounds when he did run. It's also silly to try and make it seem like his touchdowns are "goosing" his production. The reason he can run inside the ten is because he's great at it. How many other quarterbacks can do it like him? 

     

     

    • Like (+1) 1
  7. 18 hours ago, VW82 said:

    If it wasn't Lamar, it should have been Purdy. I think it was Barnwell who pointed out that Purdy had the 4th greatest statistical season of all time by any/a+. Dak had a better statistical season as well. Mahomes was about the same as Josh and arguably had less weapons. 

     

    Josh will hopefully prove he's the best player in the NFL with this upcoming SB run, but as for 2023 MVP, No. 

     

    Did you even watch the above video? 😂

  8. 7 hours ago, Buffalo716 said:

     

    Spend 18 minutes of your day to listen to Dion Dawkins talk

     

    When a lot of people were putting him down in the offseason...

     

    This man is a true professional.. a humble human being.. wise... A great person... And a tremendous football player

     

    He always gets better as the year goes on which is the Hallmark of a true professional player... Tons start hot and end soft

     

    Dion always plays his best late in the year

     

    And the way he speaks and his outlook on life is tremendous which I put to Sean McDermott in drafting him

     

    He truly is an amazing person and I'm thankful he is a Buffalo Bill

     

    Go Bills

     

     

     

    Well Said!!👍

  9. On 1/18/2024 at 2:12 AM, kota said:

    just saw that Ron Rivera is interested in coaching still and how he missed coaching on a granular level when he took over for Jack Del Rio who was fired mid season.  He also stated he has a few opportunities available.

    I think this is a bit interesting.  

     

    NO THANKYOU!!!!

  10. On 1/16/2024 at 3:44 PM, FilthyBeast said:

    NFL definitely bringing out the 'big guns' so to speak in this one.

     

    Don't be shocked if/when KC gets all the calls either as much I hate to admit it.

     

    He got lambasted for his terrible job against the Bills, so he could think two ways. 1) I have to be better this time or 2) I'm pissed at those Bills fans and I'll show them 

  11. On 1/8/2024 at 11:53 AM, Bleeding Bills Blue said:

    It's 5 dollars, plus you get the royal rumble at the end of the month 🙂

     

    It's actually 6 😉

    On 1/8/2024 at 11:54 AM, Bleeding Bills Blue said:

     

    They've had TNF on prime for a couple of years - why is it different for peacock to buy a game?  

     

    ESPN and NFL network are in far fewer houses - so people needed to buy a streaming service to watch those too.  

     

    Because it's a playoff game

  12. 5 hours ago, Heavy Kevi said:

    I have watched every game for decades. Literally.

     

    Even gotten free trials of fubo, downloaded apps, got up at absurd times to see London games, etc.

     

    But this game isn't on LOCAL ROCHESTER MARKET because piddly little peacock is trying a money grab. 

     

    All the other "exclusives" had free trials, were simulcast on a real network, or even in the case of prime- everyone already has it. But peacock, tiny little bullschitt peacock with nothing worthwhile to offer? The NFL not only isn't afraid, they actively don't like us.

     

    So I can't. I just can't. Sure, I could afford the subscription; but I can't positively reinforce negative behavior by the NFL trying yet another way into fans' pockets. 

     

    They will take our tax money to build the brand new stadium for a billionaire, but we can't even watch the effing game. Pathetic.

     

    Sadly, this is just the beginning. I'm sorry they did this to you, and I don't blame you for not paying them. 

  13. 52 minutes ago, Process said:

    Momma not happy.

     

    Regardless of who is at fault (Gabe, Josh, Brady), our WR2 who plays 90% of snaps having ZERO catches in 3 of the past 5 games is concerning. 

     

    It's very concerning indeed. He definitely will not come back. My feeling is Josh may not be looking for him, for whatever reason that is. 

×
×
  • Create New...