Jump to content

CSBill

Community Member
  • Posts

    9,232
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by CSBill

  1. A thought:

     

    The Bills need to go no-huddle but use the entire play clock. It keeps the KC offense off the field and, more importantly, the Bills D off the field.

     

    Did anyone else notice that the Eagles were milking the clock the entire game--it seemed every snap was with less than 5 seconds on the play clock. Why? To keep the Bills offense off the field, and with that, we still scored over 30 points.

     

    We know the Bills' offense can score points again; now, use the offense to protect and help the Defense.

  2. 3 hours ago, GETTOTHE50 said:

    Obviously we’re wanted the commandeers to win today, but the fish have a real shot of getting to the Super Bowl. If they get home field, I could see it happening sadly 

     

    I think Miami has the least favorable "home-field advantage" in the league. Whomever they are playing, it is always about 50/50 fans between them and the other team.

    • Agree 1
  3. 5 hours ago, SWATeam said:

    I see 8 fumbles in 8 playoff games.  To go along with 56 regular season fumbles.  It's very hard to argue that he hasn't been a turnover machine.

     

    To me, the fumbles have always been the most troubling. Many--most--of those come when he is trying to do too much. But this season has not been as bad. He only has 4 in 12 games (3 lost); last year, it was 13, and 5 lost.

  4. 1 minute ago, DasNootz said:

    It could have been harder had we made the tackle in bounds rather than stripped the receiver of the reception on the previous play.  A running clock for that kick would have amped up the pressure.

     

    That's precisely what I said in the moment: let him catch it. He would not gain any yards, making for a quick rush onto the field.

     

    Then again, who would that be harder for? Is it the team that just lost a game by sending 12 out there in the exact same scenario, or the team that seems to be prepared for anything?

    • Like (+1) 2
    • Eyeroll 1
  5. 4 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

    For sure, but I think people get too caught up on contract value. They have so much to spend and they only have 53 guys to spread it over. As it’s not my money I don’t care whether they spend it all or not. Neither of these guys, regardless of salary, has contributed a darn thing all season. Not sure what the point was of investing in either of them. 

     

    I agree, but I would give Sherfield one slight contributing edge; he has been pretty consistent as a Special teams player. Regardless, neither has been much.

    • Like (+1) 1
  6. Happy Game Day TBD! After last week, I'm getting a little of my enthusiasm back. Signs of life were evident. Seeing Josh back was like watching Hoosiers when Jimmy returns to the team (by the way, I must see movie to get you ready for basketball season). As for today, pull out the leftovers and make a turkey cheesesteak, or turkey soup, or turkey casserole, or turkey pot pie, or just warm it up in the microwave, and watch our boys put a Thanksgiving leftover spanking on another form of birds from Philadephia.

     

    LET'S GO BUFFALO !!!

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Awesome! (+1) 1
  7. 1 hour ago, stevestojan said:

    Hate to say it, but so far he’s been a liability. He makes zero attempt to move laterally (understandable given the injury). He pushes straight forward, often times multiple yards past the QB. It’s like there’s 10 guys out there when he is playing. I respect his history of greatness, and I understand letting him gain confidence while he fully recovers, but this is crunch time. And if he can’t contribute, he shouldn’t be out there. 


    Totally agree, right now he is a liability. He can’t move side-to-side, he’s lost his quickness, and he has never been the strongest defender on the field, so how is he contributing? Answer: None to little. As he is now, he is a liability. Yeah, it’s 11 versus 10 when he is on the field. 

     

×
×
  • Create New...