mrags
-
Posts
16,587 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by mrags
-
-
5 minutes ago, Heitz said:
I feel like you don't understand language if you don't think "I figured we would" is the same as "absolutely expected to". 🤷♂️
Bigger picture, just because YOU think they had someone in mind and YOU think it's a terrible pick doesn't make it so...
just because you are in SDSs lap doesn’t mean you have to reply
-
1
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, B-Man said:
No.
I'll type slow.
WE wanted him. He was highly rated on OUR board
We couldn't trade down because NE would have drafted him.
Okay?
Now up to bed with you.
.
The same people saying that are arguing that giving worthy to the chiefs wasn’t a big deal. Pot meet kettle
-
1 minute ago, Alphadawg7 said:
Curious...what are you going to say when Coleman puts up more yards, TD's and catches than both Thomas and Legette this season?
That likely won’t be tough. Legette has a terrible team and terrible QB. And Thomas is splitting with a good group of WRs down in Jax.
-
-
How does everyone feel now? Not that anyone cares. But what a terrible pick. Could have traded down more and still got him. Would have rather taken the best punter than this joke.
this front office sucks.
-
1
-
-
Please god no
-
1
-
-
Just now, SDS said:
you still have Hawaii on the brain. You just quoted what you said in response to me. Here is your original post that I was responding to:“I think one of my biggest issues is he had a presser last night saying absolutely expected to make a pick at 32.”
Yeah I edited it. I wasn’t quoting him in my OP. But you make it a point to make me look foolish by pointing out that I was wrong. So were you my friend.
my Point is still made. He was expecting to make a pick. My point still stands. I believe they had someone in mind and they were taken between 28 and 32. 2 of those picks were WRs. Maybe it’s what we wanted. Maybe it’s not. We will never know. I still think it’s stupid to be happy about moving up from 6th rd to the 5th rd for the cost of losing the 5th year option on a player. Especially in a draft that many say there’s only 150 or so draft able players.
we’ll see what happens tonight. My hopes are in the dirt though. I expect much more disappointment from this joke of a GM, HC, Owner.
-
3
-
-
17 minutes ago, SDS said:
I just listened to this after your comment. He absolutely did not say he absolutely was going to pick at 32. While I would have to go back to “his exact words, I think he said “we FIGURED we would pick at 32.” Then he said he talking to his friend Dan and they decided differently.
Figured is not even close to absolutely.
Not sure what you listened to but I heard differently. And I never said “absolutely”. This is what I said
19 minutes ago, mrags said:He 100% said he was ready to make a pick at 32 then his “buddy Dan Morgan called him” and here we are
What he said was:he said “honestly THOUGHT we would pick at 32…. But then talked to my buddy Dan”
starts around 1:30 if you want to listen.
like I said. I admit I was incorrect. But you are also wrong saying I said “absolutely”
edit:yeah yeah yeah. You’re going to go to my last post where I did say absolutely. I wasn’t quoting at this point. Whatever. I’m just doing things today. I’m not in the market for quoting this idiot GM -
1 minute ago, SDS said:
He def did not say the bolded in that way.
He 100% said he was ready to make a pick at 32 then his “buddy Dan Morgan called him” and here we are
-
They have legit the worse WR room in possibly the AFC. At least as of 3:25 on 4/26/24
-
1 hour ago, 26TrapDraw said:
Use the same rationale for Beane trusting his evaluators instincts. Do you think if the Bills had a first round grade on worthy or Leggette they wouldn’t have taken him? They have a plan. Trust our GM and if in three years he gets fired because this draft was a disaster and it lead to losing then we will know won’t we. Truth is we just don’t know.
even though we have lots of NFL caliber talent evaluators here.
🤡🤡🤡
I think one of my biggest issues is he had a presser last night saying absolutely expected to make a pick at 32. That tells me they had someone in mind and then he was taken between 28 and 32. Maybe that was Worthy, or Pearsal. Who knows. It was probably one of those DBs for all we know. Point is, he addressed it and said he was going to pick someone then didn’t. It’s odd to me. Even if he just had a great deal in place with Carolina is fine, but you miss the 5th year option on whatever player you’re taking. If that was a WR, CB, DE, he absolutely should have to answer for that considering all 3 of those positions require very large 2nd contract if they are good. It’s monetarily beneficial for that alone.
-
1
-
-
36 minutes ago, Virgil said:
Prepare to be livid. Based on how the WR's went, I think the draft grades on a lot of the receiver left might honestly make it to the end of the 2nd round, or close enough to trade up range.
If we stay at 33, I think the pick is DeJean and we hope Franklin or the UNC receiver is there later. All of our pre-draft visits would support that theory
If they take Dejean ill seriously…. Ugh…. I don’t want to think about it
-
1
-
-
5 hours ago, NewEra said:
So we should have stayed at 28 and drafted a player we could’ve had later, while not getting an extra 3rd rd pick….just so KC wouldn’t be able to give us a free 3rd rd pick in order to select a player that may have been there when they picked at 32? 🤷🏻♂️
worrying about other teams = fail
worrying about building your own team = yes please
do what’s best for your team. Worrying about what other teams are doing is for losers. Jmo
I guess you read my post wrong. I was simply trying to explain that I don’t necessarily hate what happened as far as not taking a player. I like worthy, not as much as many here I’ll admit that. But I did like him. I was fine if they didn’t draft him and they have trades on other guys they like better.
And I generally do not care about giving another team the pick and taking the player they want anyway. Fact is, you’re correct, they likely would have gotten him anyway. I still don’t want to be the team to give it to them. Either way, still doesn’t bother me.
But it is noted the media brought up last night ok both NFLN and ESPN that it’s the Bills that gave up Mahomes, and laughed at us for how that has worked out. Here’s the thing, I generally don’t care about losing out on Mahomes. I’d honestly take Allen every time if I had the chance. I think Mahomes is a douche. But, it does kind of get old having to hear the same thing over and over again when someone brings it up. And we didn’t again. Granted it’s not one of the best QBs of all time we’re talking about so I guess there’s that.
even still, I don’t care about giving them a player and agree that we shouldn’t worry about other teams. I don’t. I’m just sick of hearing the same crap other and over. And if Worthy is the next Hill for KC, we will never hear the end of it.
someone here pointed out tho, that even though the Bills had no more first round grades on anyone and that’s why they’re back, it still could be that maybe Worthy or Legette or Pearsal (kind of a joke) were our next 3 WRs on board and now we don’t have an opportunity to pick one of them. In his presser last night Beane did say he expected to pick at 32 after the trade. So what changed? 3 guys at a position of need were now gone and we went with another trade back because of it. Which is fine imo. UNLESS….. you covet having the first round pick on someone for the 5th round option. And let’s be real about that here it isn’t huge advantage, especially on a position like WR, to get them for that extra year before they need to renegotiate a contract worth 20-30m.
But I really was trying to say that I don’t feel terrible about what happened, I have positives and negatives for what happened. I hope they use those picks and move around today like Kevin Costner in draft day. Making it all worth it.
-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, Thurman#1 said:
Yeah?
I'm fine.
Lotta years before we know how this worked out, but again, trading up as high and giving up as much as they'd have had to get one of the top three never made economic sense.
I thought they might go up a bit for BTJ, but I guess they didn't like him as much as many thought. I'm just waiting to see how this all turns out. Might be great.
Anyway, Day Two just got a ton more interesting, from one pick to three.
Well. At the time I was seriously being sarcastic. Brian Thomas Jr hadn’t been locked yet. We were somewhere wound pick 20 I think.
personally, I think we had a deal in place with Dallas at 24. Then BTJ went at 23 and everything changed for us. I say this because Dallas took all but 12 seconds to announce their trade with Detroit. Which makes me believe they had a deal in place with someone and then at the last minute it fell through. So they scrambled for another deal.
im somewhat fine with everything for the most part. But as i wrote in my post about how things played out, we will look like fools if Worthy or Legette are stars in this league, no matter who we pick.
personally I think they may trade back again at 33. In Beanes presser last night they already said they were fielding calls.
-
Here’s where I’m at right now.
I would have been happy with Mitchell or McConkey at 28 without any trades. And we traded back and got, not extra picks, but made our later picks better in the process.
Now, if they go with that DB/S tomorrow at 33 I’m gonna be livid.
If they take Mitchell, McConkey, Franklin, I’ll be perfectly happy with it. As I would have been at 28.
Now; with that all said, you picked up the extra 3rd rounder, and now have some better ammo with the four 5th rounders. So i really really hope they are active tomorrow. Getting either an extra 2nd by moving back into the 2nd rd. Or moving up from 60 to the 40s or something. And then hopefully moving up in the 3rd again too.
I will wait and see what he does.
BUT……
I am absolutely with most agreeing that you shouldn’t give KC the chance to take a guy that can smoke you for years to come. If worthy or Legette are the real deal in this league we look like fools again. No matter who we take.-
3
-
3
-
2
-
-
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, The Firebaugh Kid said:
Just checking in on this thread to make sure everybody’s OK
No. We’re not
-
3
-
-
Just now, cle23 said:
He really can't. If he's proven the father and the mother is awarded support, he can't do much after that.
Also, you're making an awful lot of assumptions here. He admitted he has 10 kids. Not like he is trying to say they aren't his.
My point was he’s a scumbag
-
39 minutes ago, Aussie Joe said:
I used to listen to him 5-6 years ago but gave it away …Never happy about anything ..and seemed to think his audience cared about his gambling and Fantasy football results ..
Assume nothing has changed …
It’s way worse. He has much more of a narcissistic attitude now than he used to.
-
1
-
-
6 minutes ago, TBBills Fan said:
In Florida they can
3 minutes ago, cle23 said:Most states require employers to withhold child support.
He’ll still fight it as much as he can.
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, Buffalo Barbarian said:
i would be good with that but you never know what a waste will be.
Worthy and Franklin are too slim
I think Franklin will be fine. We’re missing out 1 and 2 at this point. He kind of fits into Diggs role anyway and Diggs wasn’t exactly a thick dude.
as far as Worthy, goes, I feel the same way. We need a 1 and 2 now. So I’d be fine with Worthy, but want a bigger physical guy to pair with him. So I’d take Worthy with a trade down and an extra 2nd or 3rd rounder. Then come back up and try and get Legette or Polk. If those guys are gone, Devontez Walker, Rice, Baker.
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Buffalo Barbarian said:
Having a ball hog ruins the offense, better to have 5 really good guys than 1 elite player. Coleman is also better than Davis so thats an upgrade. Can a rookie be as great as Diggs coming in ??
Also it would be a trade back to 33 which isnt much different than being at 28 and we also would get 39.
If we could still get like Franklin or Worthy, along with a Legette or Polk, I’m all for it. Anything less than that it’s a waste
Just now, Putin said:Exactly !!
Our practice squad can use an upgrade nobody here is even talking about that !!Right. Need to find someone to wear the C on special teams after all. Get a whole team of Tyler Matakevichs I say.
-
1
-
-
I’m 100% all for moving up for a top 3 WR. Would give up a 1st, next years 1st, and our 2nd as well. Keeping the 2nd we got from the Diggs trade. If that means keeping our pick at 60 I’m all for that.
-
2
-
-
Just now, TBBills Fan said:
He paying one way or other. Those girls feel like they hit the lottery. When he busts inside!
He ain’t paying. They can take his butt to court and he still won’t pay.
what are the laws in Florida, can they take it right out of his checks? If not he’s not paying.
1 minute ago, BuffaloBillyG said:Disagree on him having a football team. Tyreek thinks of his kids more as sparring partners.
Let’s be fair, he likely doesn’t call them his kids and refuses paternity tests
Round 2, Pick 33: WR Keon Coleman, Florida State
in The Stadium Wall
Posted
Ok. I’m not disagreeing with your arguments. I’m also not debating that either of those 2 will be better than Coleman. But I have said multiple times, situation means more than most factors in how good someone becomes. Coleman has Allen, one of the best players in the game throwing to him. The shrimp in Carolina won’t even be in the league in 2 more years. And Lawrence isn’t on Allen’s level. But sure, I’ll go toe to toe with ya. I think Coleman sucks and I’m betting he won’t be nearly as good as Thomas and I’d be shocked he’s as good as Legette.