All_Pro_Bills

Expect they all have contingency plans in place to use all those stolen billions for when everything breaks down to flee to a very comfortable lifestyle at expensive villas in Italy and then later will join the speaking tour to advance the cause of "democracy". Of course our government in Washington knows full-well whats going on and perhaps is getting a cut of the action to look the other way. But all's good for the cause of "democracy". Or so the fools believe that's what its all about.

It's a reflection on the educational system and social justice doctrine that everything is automatically the fault of some white guy.

I think the industry and the various ways to provide consumers with programming choices and subscription options comes down to a constant battle between the people providing the service vs. the people producing the content. Both want your money but how it gets divided between them is a lot of back and forth. In this case the NFL "owns" the content and is comfortable with the service providers on various platforms and media to bid against each other to maximize the leagues "take". Consumer convenience and access isn't much of a concern.

I won't be watching and wonder if anyone feels like I do here. I had Directv Sunday Ticket for a long time and watched every Bills game. Then the contract went to YouTube and I said enough. Last year I was fortunate. I was able to watch 13 of the Bills 17 games without Sunday Ticket or shelling out any money for extra streaming services. This year or in the future, if their game is on some streaming service I don't already has then so be it. From what I've gotten out of the schedule leaks so far it doesn't sound like the Bills are going to be playing Christmas Day so missing some games of other teams is no big deal.

I continue to stress the problem faced by Ukraine is a lack of troops for combat operations as a result of multiples of dead and wounded greater than the official government numbers report. You can't set up defensive lines and fall-back positions if you barely have enough soldiers to man the front lines. And going on the offensive would be next to impossible. No amount of weapons or money is going to solve the manpower problem. They need more soldiers, plain and simple. The cheerleaders can wave their pom-poms all they want but its becoming clear there's a need to negotiate or face defeat. The remaining option would be to directly intervene with US and/or NATO country combat forces. Something that would be immensely unpopular. Its certain the domestic propaganda machine will keep drilling the public with the "domino theory" narrative. My expectation is Washington would demand some European nation(s) sends their soldiers into the meat grinder rather than face the ire of US voters in November.

All the price increases are due to corporate greed and have nothing to do with states imposing 15 to 20 dollar minimum wage laws and increases in the price of input prices due to things like sanctions and regulations. Also. Watch for a lower CPI number coming out. An illusion to quell inflation talk. Because Biden desperately needs it for rate cuts gooing into November. So it magically shall be.

The times they are changing. We've also never had political party leaders posing as journalists pushing doctrine and opinion rather than news.

I'm concerned with the potential for individual acts of voter fraud and not some nebulous potential for "widespread" fraud. I've identified several known scenarios of potential fraud. The voting process needs to provide citizens the confidence that elections are free and fair and known opportunities for fraud are addressed so they don't happen. Otherwise, it will leave opportunity for people of all political views, regardless of the result, to suggest and charge the election results are suspect and they'll be within reason to raise that issue. The goal is to eliminate the possibility of fraud rather than responding to it after the fact. Why are you against making sure every vote cast is valid?

As long as we all believe only citizens should vote and only vote once and there should be some form of voter identification to weed out any potential fraud and the process of mail in signature verification is legitimate and state laws and rules about late ballot disqualifications are enforced properly we should be okay. I think that covers it.

I disagree. I think the far-left ideologists that control the Democratic party are more inclined to threaten democracy through their authoritarian tendencies and disastrous social agenda than any populist movement inside the Republican party. For all his faults and character flaws 4 years of Trump would likely do far less damage than another 4 years of Biden. In my initial comments, I should have included I would prefer somebody else to either.

Under Biden the US national debt has risen by $5.7 trillion. The accumulation of debt is what fuels the illusion of a growing and healthy economy. A trillion is a big number. A debt and currency crisis is unavoidable regardless of the 2024 election results. But they won't stop spending. Neither major party has the will to do what is necessary. This doesn't even include State and local government debt, agency issued debt, or the debt of private citizens and corporations. Whatever your views, all you can do is protect yourself from financial disaster as best as possible. That means getting a portion of your investments, if you have any, out of the US dollar. Into things like emerging economy funds or precious metals, or crypto. Into hard assets like real estate. When it happens exactly is guess work but the impact will be devastating.

According to statements from President Recep Erdogan,Turkey Treating Over 1,000 Wounded Hamas Members In Hospitals around the country. Unlike the US and many of our allies, Turkey, a NATO member does not consider Hamas to be a terrorist organization. To quote, "Hamas is a resistance organization whose lands have been occupied since 1947, and it has protected its lands after the occupation". Just how they got the wounded out of the West Bank is subject to speculation. Here's one for giggles. If Israel was to attack Turkey for their support and sheltering of Hamas, would the United States and NATO go to war against the Jewish state if Turkey invoked article 5? An attack on one is an attack on all.

There's no such law about NDA's and political campaigns. If there was it would fall under the jurisdiction of the Federal Election Commission which declined to get involved and not jerk-water NY state court. Why have an NDA if you are required to disclose its existence?

Why does he need to disclose the payment at any time? Is there some legal obligation for political candidates to disclose the existence of an NDA?

If you're an electrician or one of the "poorly educated" Americans you might wonder why you're working to pay taxes so that ass wipe in the white house can forgive the student loans of mind blowing imbeciles and credentialed idiots in a desperate attempt to buy votes to stay in power.

The DNC convention will be in Chicago this summer. The convention and the street action have the potential to go in a lot of different directions. But I suspect the professional demonstrators mixed in with the college crowd protesting for Palestine will not be on the payroll of the party or one of its favorite NGO's during the event.

I've seen several stories and sources cite US military strategists express frustration with Ukrainian tactics and their hesitancy to take advice on how to establish more effective defensive lines and fortifications.

Its been much cooler than normal here in the Northeast but I've yet to hear anyone suggest we're on the verge of a major cyclical cooling trend or Ice Age. For me, whether or not the climate is changing, which it is always doing, and how much of it can be attributable to human activity is not the issue. Let's just say it is changing and end that debate. And get to the real matter for us all. The issue is the identification of the cause, burning fossil fuels, and the solution to that problem. Replacing fossil fuels with renewables. The climate cult is full of buzz words like "sustainable" and "renewable" but there's a hint of dishonesty in their messaging. They paint the picture of some seamless transition to renewables with few to no consequences to individuals or society as a whole. All we need to do is make the commitment to spend the money and make the effort to transform our society to net carbon zero or something like that. Another buzz term. Just unplug from gasoline and go with EV's and continue on our merry way without missing a beat. The physics of it all suggest renewables, wind and solar, are unreliable low energy output sources that will never be able to replace fossil fuels without making concessions regarding cost and mobility. Cultist cite expected technological improvements in battery storage efficiency in the future as thing that will save the day. Its a common theme, as masters of the universe our technology will always be available to solve every problem we encounter. So have no fear. The ecological and environmental cost of disposing of all those used batteries isn't discussed at all. But there will be consequences to everyone. One specific I'm still waiting to hear about is the fate of commercial air travel. Electric planes I expect all providing the same level of service as jet fuel. The unfortunate truth is many lifestyle changes and sacrifices will be required. The "smart" people driving these changes know that's the truth. But they fear sharing the need for drastic lifestyle changes and sacrifices will not sit well with the majority that will be hesitant to give up anything. So they keep quiet. The plan will provide lots of benefits with almost no costs. So don't ask any questions. Or you'll be cast as a climate denier. And don't worry. The elites pushing the agenda, rest assured, will give up nothing. Another common theme.

Biden swung the gates wide open and said c'mon in no questions asked.

The problem is the act of manipulating evidence for public relations stunts such as photos used for media attention and political purposes, which Federal law enforcement organizations should be above doing, opens the door for additional scrutiny and speculation. So they brought items similar to the items described in the search warrant to location of an executed search warrant and used them to fake the actual evidence recovered from the site in this way, how do we know you didn't fake it in other ways? How do we know they didn't plant anything? Or exceed their authority under the warrant? Credibility and confidence are lost. And a reasonable doubt the investigation is legitimate is open to questioning.

More myths: White supremacists are lucking in the shadows ready to jump on marginalized and victimized groups when their leader gives the signal. Putin is coordinating with the Trump campaign and organizing more election interference activities after making a deal with Dr. Evil to divide the world. The US intelligence community is working to ensure American democracy. Censorship is good. Our differences bring us closer together. All right wing conspiracies are disinformation while all left wing conspiracies are real.

Ho hum.... Please don't bore us with this drivel.

As a lifelong member of the Washington establishment and beltway insider it was in the agencies best interests to have Joe Biden win the election. So they lied knowing doing so had no consequences of any kind. If the CIA and the Intelligence Community agencies aren't representative of the deep state or "the swamp" then what is representative? Raise your hand if you still believe the elected civilian government of the United State is actually running the country? You want democracy and want to elect establishment candidates to high office? You can't have both.

I believe the MSM has always had some form of bias and editorializing in its communication and messaging to the public. What was missing up until recently is an alternative view and source. Something to compare it against. So they needed to invent misinformation and disinformation. And protect their previous monopoly on disseminating news and information to the public. I marvel at how many of these independent sources have stories almost immediately while the networks have delays of hours or days on some of them. Its like they have an extra step in the news delivery process to decide whether or not they should let us know about something or not let us know about something. Basically, a censor or not censor step. Who exactly gets to decide what we should know?

Arch-criminal and creator of Russian collusion hoax that escaped all charges complains about justice system.