Mularkey
Community Member-
Posts
152 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Mularkey
-
Only Ralph gains from gains being in Toronto
Mularkey replied to billsfreak's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
If you put a winning product out there year in and year out, maybe a year or two below .500 and revenue is not an issue (not a huge issue now in my opinion). Not only would you sell out most if not all games as the Bills already do but corporate sponsors would jump on board. Why, because it would be a hot ticket, in demand and the buzz would be enough to get those luxury boxes sold. Also, sell the freakin' naming rights for the stadium. Ralph has to pay more up front (to the front office and personnel)to get it back later. Spend money to make money. The last 10+ years of crap on the field has made corporations stay away from luxury suites and the Bills altogether. I know the economy in Western NY is terrible, but enough corporations would come out of the woodwork if the Bills were perennial contenders. It starts with Ralph, unfortunately he is too set in his ways to turn this around before he passes and once that happens, everything changes due to debt load of a new owner. Only then can I begin to think the Bills may not be sustainable in Buffalo. -
Bills "off the scneid" predictions
Mularkey replied to lets_go_bills's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Week 6 VS. BYE -
This may sound crazy but I would draft 2) QB's in the draft next year, seriously. Once you figure out which one is the franchise, you trade the other one. Could take 2 seasons to develop them but you will get your man and then trade the other one. It would be like an insurance policy on the QB position. I know there are many other glaring needs but start with the QB and build around them. I would trade someone of value now to stock pile a few extra picks. If the team misses on 2 QB's in the same draft then take a permanent knee.
-
Without a doubt, tanking a season for a draft pick is a terrible idea and I do not believe that even the Bills would stoop this low. Besides, if you really want "the guy" in a draft trade up and go get him.
-
I am not looking for the savior of the franchise at the moment, just a QB that can sustain drives and give the young offense some experience at moving the football in the right direction. Develop the young talent so if the Bills ever do get the savior (maybe in next years draft) the young guys will have some meaningful experience under their collective belts, or new talent can be brought in. And yes I do question Gailey's talent evaluation as well as Buddy Nix, give me one reason why I shouldn't? I haven't thrown in the towel yet by any means but I'm not overly impressed thus far.
-
I agree the receivers are suspect, all the more reason to expose them to further the rebuilding process. There just isn't much to evaluate the younger guys on and if things continue the same way we still wont know about the receivers. I hope no one chimes in with the "the receivers are never open" crap. Watch other football games and see QB's thread the needle into coverage or call a play to throw to the back shoulder of a receiver in coverage. It can be, and it is done routinely in the NFL while the QB is under pressure.
-
Gailey needs to make some permanent changes now
Mularkey replied to USABuffaloFan's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Sad but true. -
I didn't say anything about winning games, I am not sure the Bills can do that or very much of that with any QB on the roster or free agents. However, with that being said a different QB could move the ball, sustain drives and develop the young guys on the offense. You know, give the rookies some experience and give the coaches more to look at when they evaluate the talent at the end of the season. At this rate you simply do not know what the receivers can do because the ball is never thrown to them. Rookies essentially remain rookies in this offense. Develop your offense by sustaining some offense any way you can. This simply can not happen with Trent Edwards. If you win a couples games by doing this then that is a bonus.
-
The Bills are bad and will be for the year, probably longer but that does not mean we should continue to go nowhere on offense. By continuing to play Edwards the Bills hurt the development of the rest of the guys on offense, especially the receivers. We have a relatively young group of players who will regress under Edwards. Put Brohm in and see what happens and if he doesn't produce with some passing yardage then bring in Fitzy but with Edwards in no one gets to develop except for the punting team. If Fitzy cant get it done bring in a free agent, someone who actually throws the football.
-
Wow, I smiled and cringed at the same time. Thanks.
-
When Fred Jackson scored on the screen.....
Mularkey replied to Simon's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
I'm with you on that, I couldn't get myself to billieve that winning was in the cards. -
I thought it was late because the whistle had blown 5 seconds prior to that douche diving at Trent.
-
At least he got a penalty this time around but I swear he is going for our QB's legs every chance he gets, and it's usually a late hit.
-
Couldn't agree more. At some point you need to hit one of the receivers in the mouth and not be 8 yards away.
-
Please aim you vitriol at me....
Mularkey replied to The Poojer's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
I blame Mike Tirico. -
It's getting to the point where it is expected. Another heart breaking loss but I have become numb to all the pain, seriously I just sat there and watched it happen. I expected it to happen and it did. There is this sick feeling that I expect to feel on Monday night games with this team since Jauron. I cant put it all on him but there is this stigma following the Bills around for far too long.
-
Ellison is a serviceable backup and that is it.
-
There is a distinct difference between being in position to win and actually winning.
-
Broken bone in arm per Jauron no further details.
-
The same could be said for Jauron's on field decsions.
-
Mort on sportscenter says despite what you have heard and read Jauron would not be the guy who wanted this to happen. I think he may have gone along with it because his ass is on the line but it smacks of Ralph and Russ to me. Also, Rochester media seam to have sources who also confirm this but if you want give some credit to Dick he needs all the help he can get.
-
Agreed, no way Jauron wanted to spice things up.
-
I hope your right about that, I just wish the FO could stomach losing the money they owed Jauron from his contract extension and moved on.
-
to all that said NO Season tickets this year
Mularkey replied to mead107's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Want to but wont. Just can not get the thought of Jauron still at the helm out of my head. I hope he proves me wrong and I have to eat these words, Go Bills.