shrader Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 The refs did a good job at stopping what could have become a full blown riot. I have no idea how they pulled that off, but yeah, great work there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CDogg20 Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 There is no place in the NFL for those kind of actions. He should be suspended indefinatly. What a cheap shot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shoveldog Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 It was just a slip up by the refs. They had to deal with a potential brawl on the field and slipped on the details when it was finally time to announce the call. Fair catch or not, you have to let the guy catch the ball, so it's still the same penalty either way. Who says you have to let the guy catch the ball? There was no fair catch signal in the clip I saw. Was it brutal? Yes. Dirty? Yes. Was it illegal... you'd have a hard time proving that one to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkAF43 Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 Who says you have to let the guy catch the ball? There was no fair catch signal in the clip I saw. Was it brutal? Yes. Dirty? Yes. Was it illegal... you'd have a hard time proving that one to me. you can't hit the guy before he makes contact with the ball. Nothing to debate, it was totally illegal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coach Klein Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 One game suspension against us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfaningeneseo Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 A one game suspension is crap. This should be 3 at least for a completely blatant illegal hit with absolutely no excuse. Until these players are made to pay and pay hard, this will not stop. Fines do so little, who the crap cares if a guy has to pay 50,000 if they are making 5 million a year? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flbillsfan#1 Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 Who says you have to let the guy catch the ball? There was no fair catch signal in the clip I saw. Was it brutal? Yes. Dirty? Yes. Was it illegal... you'd have a hard time proving that one to me. If you watched the GAME not a short clip, he called for a fair catch. At any rate as another poster pointed out even if no fair catch is called the receiver can not be hit before touching the ball. DIRTY & ILLEGAL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 Who says you have to let the guy catch the ball? Uh....the rule book?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frit0 Bandit0 Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 Wow talk about a dumb a$$. That is a low life cheap shot ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 Uh....the rule book?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erynthered Posted October 20, 2009 Author Share Posted October 20, 2009 One game suspension against us. He should have got more than a one game suspension. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cåblelady Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 Wow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts