JJBuffalo Posted March 10, 2009 Share Posted March 10, 2009 GB's wideouts need to be alot higher. Probably just outside top 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted March 10, 2009 Share Posted March 10, 2009 Maybe it's just me, but perhaps we should wait and see how well Evans and Owens ACTUALLY play before we start ranking them as one of the top five best receiving duos in football. Ya think? I'll wait this out, too...but it could be very good. As for Moss vs. Owens, Moss is more explosive, at this point in time. But, play-in and play-out, Owens if better. Unlike Moss (who really dogged in early in 2008), Owens doesn't take plays off, and he isn't afraid to block for the running game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEra Posted March 10, 2009 Share Posted March 10, 2009 Please tell me you do not have Tampas pair at 10!?! Michael Clayton is terrible. The pair in GB should be much higher. Jennings led the league in receptions for much of the season and driver though not young is still a big time threat. My list: 1. Arizona - Fitz and Boldin 2. New England - Welker and Moss 3. Buffalo - Owens and Evans 4. Indy - Wayne and Gonzalez 5. Houston - Walter and Johnson 6. Denver - Royal and Marshall 7 Pittsburgh - Ward and Holmes. 8. Cinci - Coles and Johnson 9. Green Bay - Driver and Jennings 10. Washington - Moss and Randle El 11. Carolina - Smith and Muhammad 13. Dallas - Williams and Crayton 13.San Diego - Jackson and Chambers 14. Seattle - Housh and Branch 15. New Orleans - Colston and Henderson 16. Atlanta - Jenkins and White 17. Tampa Bay - Bryant and Clayton 18. Kansas City - Bowe and Bradley 19. Baltimore - Clayton and Mason 20. Minnesota - Berrian and Wade 20. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buftex Posted March 10, 2009 Share Posted March 10, 2009 Maybe it's just me, but perhaps we should wait and see how well Evans and Owens ACTUALLY play before we start ranking them as one of the top five best receiving duos in football. I have no questions about their talent and their numbers on paper. That being said, whether or not they actually live up to those numbers this season is another thing entirely. This thread would be better situated mid-to-late season, wouldn't it? Wet blanket, is that you? We shouldn't wait and see...it may never look this good again! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROCCEO Posted March 10, 2009 Share Posted March 10, 2009 I don't possibly see how anyone would ever rank Clayton/Mason above Chambers/Jackson. That just doesn't compute. Also i agree with what was said above in regard to the recievers of the following teams: Saints, Steelers and Broncos. Esp the Broncos. Brandon Marshall is incredible and Eddie Royal proved to be a very legit 2nd option in only his rookie year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts