freedom2528 Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 Send next years Number 2 and R.Parrish Trade for Him, now..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JJBuffalo Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 Send next years Number 2 and R.Parrish Trade for Him, now..... might take a bit more than next yrs number 2 for a franchise QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bizell Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 might take a bit more than next yrs number 2 for a franchise QB. x1000 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freedom2528 Posted March 2, 2009 Author Share Posted March 2, 2009 might take a bit more than next yrs number 2 for a franchise QB. He may be worth it. We have not had one in over 13 years. Pull th etrigger and get it done this years #2 next years and through R.Parrish in too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alphadawg7 Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 Send next years Number 2 and R.Parrish Trade for Him, now..... lmao...you actually think we could Cutler for that? HA! We would be lucky to get Scheffler for that...It will take at least one #1...send our #1 and Edwards... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freedom2528 Posted March 2, 2009 Author Share Posted March 2, 2009 lmao...you actually think we could Cutler for that? HA! We would be lucky to get Scheffler for that...It will take at least one #1...send our #1 and Edwards... Same as what the Chiefs paid to get Cassel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alphadawg7 Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 Same as what the Chiefs paid to get Cassel. Broncos offered a 1st and 3rd to NE for cassel...NE hooked up his old pal since Den came to the table to late...KC got a huge discount...no way on earth does Cutler goes for less than a #1 pick... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PastaJoe Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 If Cutler is so good, then why is Denver trying to get rid of him? Is it his personality or attitude? And who would they replace him with? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mantis Toboggan M.D Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 I think Denver is trying to trade him because he doesn't fit the offensive style that McDaniels brings to Denver. Short dink and dunk passes that would have worked if Cassell was there. Trading Trent, and whatever draft picks that it may take would be a no brainer if we could do it. If tampa could have had him for a 1st and 3rd. I would do that trade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freedom2528 Posted March 2, 2009 Author Share Posted March 2, 2009 I think Denver is trying to trade him because he doesn't fit the offensive style that McDaniels brings to Denver. Short dink and dunk passes that would have worked if Cassell was there. Trading Trent, and whatever draft picks that it may take would be a no brainer if we could do it. If tampa could have had him for a 1st and 3rd. I would do that trade. This would be a great deal for the marketing dept and he is young. What franchis equarterback doesn't have a attitude, it should be a requirement...RF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bizell Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 if cutler could be gotten, then by all means we'd better do the getting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsObserver Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 Send next years Number 2 and R.Parrish Trade for Him, now..... first of all, that deal wouldn't land anyone of note. secondly, it's never going to happen. the bills are happy with trent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freedom2528 Posted March 2, 2009 Author Share Posted March 2, 2009 if cutler could be gotten, then by all means we'd better do the getting. Get him now !!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBlackMamba Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 he is the same type of qb that jp losman is except better. atheltic, big arm and prone to throwing int's. he does not fit the scheme here. he needs to be able to stretch the field and we dont do that here. we havent since drew bledsoe. besides his career record is 17-24 in the worst division in football and one of the best recievers in football. what makes anyone think that if he came here in a much tougher division and a offensive scheme that would take away what he is naturally good at that he would be successful? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnTheRocks Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 I would send them Lynch and Edwards for Cutler straight up. (if they would even consider accepting that offer.) I really love Lynch as a RB - but I don't want any crimminals on the roster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjohns85 Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 i would trade edwards and our 2009 and 2010 first round draft picks. we havent had a franchise qb since jim kelley, and with cutler being so young, he could be the face of the bills for the next decade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alphadawg7 Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 he is the same type of qb that jp losman is except better. atheltic, big arm and prone to throwing int's. he does not fit the scheme here. he needs to be able to stretch the field and we dont do that here. we havent since drew bledsoe. besides his career record is 17-24 in the worst division in football and one of the best recievers in football. what makes anyone think that if he came here in a much tougher division and a offensive scheme that would take away what he is naturally good at that he would be successful? Come on now, statements like this are just silly. Dont you think his record is affected by the fact that his defense cant stop a high school football team? Cutler passed for over 4500 yards last year and the Broncos didn't miss the playoffs because of him, they had a shot at the playoffs because of him and wouldn't have even won 4 games without him at QB. Brees didnt make the playoffs either because of his defense...should we just say he isnt very good either? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve In Atlanta 2008 Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 Come on now, statements like this are just silly. Dont you think his record is affected by the fact that his defense cant stop a high school football team? Cutler passed for over 4500 yards last year and the Broncos didn't miss the playoffs because of him, they had a shot at the playoffs because of him and wouldn't have even won 4 games without him at QB. Brees didnt make the playoffs either because of his defense...should we just say he isnt very good either? Cutler wouldnt come to Buffalo as it isnt "gay friendly" Personally, I dont have a problem with it but im sure theres about 77,000 other fans who would despise it. Maybe San Fran? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 I would send them Lynch and Edwards for Cutler straight up. (if they would even consider accepting that offer.)I really love Lynch as a RB - but I don't want any crimminals on the roster. And I guess you like to see Denver as a playoff team every year. This is why fans shouldn't have any say in a team. How stupid can you get? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alphadawg7 Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 FYI: 2 Big differences in Cutler and Edwards... 1. Cutler has a big arm, better suited for Buffalo 2. Cutler keeps getting better each year and Trent regressed... Bring in Cutler! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts