Tcali Posted September 1, 2008 Share Posted September 1, 2008 Biggest changes: The Bills signed LB Kawika Mitchell and DT Marcus Stroud to improve an already stellar defensive unit. oi vay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lori Posted September 1, 2008 Share Posted September 1, 2008 I agree that whoever thinks the Bills had "an already stellar defensive unit" probably needs a drug screen, but ... link? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tcali Posted September 1, 2008 Author Share Posted September 1, 2008 I agree that whoever thinks the Bills had "an already stellar defensive unit" probably needs a drug screen, but ... link? http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=txaf...t&type=lgns Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lori Posted September 1, 2008 Share Posted September 1, 2008 Thankee. Biggest change: Schonert for Fairchild, something that he completely fails to mention. Ah well ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tcali Posted September 1, 2008 Author Share Posted September 1, 2008 Thankee. Biggest change: Schonert for Fairchild, something that he completely fails to mention. Ah well ... Lori--I still think the big factors determining the Bills success will be the play of Trent and the passrush. Yes Schonert should help facilitate that(fingers crossed) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
In-A-Gadda-Levitre Posted September 1, 2008 Share Posted September 1, 2008 http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=txaf...t&type=lgns ok, I'll agree with the stellar defense question, but that article was really poorly done. A very inaccurate picture of the strengths and weaknesses of this team. So it's more about the writer than the outrageous compliment on the D. By the way, please try to use more descriptive titles when you start a thread... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taro T Posted September 1, 2008 Share Posted September 1, 2008 Thankee. Biggest change: Schonert for Fairchild, something that he completely fails to mention. Ah well ... The line seems to be a lot better since Mouse left as well. Let's see how it looks next Sunday and (hopefully) in the near future when Jason is back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VOR Posted September 1, 2008 Share Posted September 1, 2008 Thankee. Biggest change: Schonert for Fairchild, something that he completely fails to mention. Ah well ... Speaking of which, Colorado State lost to Colorado 17-38. Figures. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lori Posted September 1, 2008 Share Posted September 1, 2008 The line seems to be a lot better since Mouse left as well. Let's see how it looks next Sunday and (hopefully) in the near future when Jason is back. That is ... interesting, isn't it? And I've been one of McNally's steadfast defenders. As you say, we'll see what it looks like in the regular season, and (hopefully) with 71 back in the lineup at some point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steely Dan Posted September 1, 2008 Share Posted September 1, 2008 ok, I'll agree with the stellar defense question, but that article was really poorly done. A very inaccurate picture of the strengths and weaknesses of this team. So it's more about the writer than the outrageous compliment on the D. By the way, please try to use more descriptive titles when you start a thread... I didn't even bother to read the article. All I needed to hear was that part about the D to know it would be a waste of time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tcali Posted September 1, 2008 Author Share Posted September 1, 2008 ok, I'll agree with the stellar defense question, but that article was really poorly done. A very inaccurate picture of the strengths and weaknesses of this team. So it's more about the writer than the outrageous compliment on the D. By the way, please try to use more descriptive titles when you start a thread... BUT that article was really poorly done?? Of course it was poorly done...of course the stellar D comment was a tipoff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phlegm Alley Posted September 1, 2008 Share Posted September 1, 2008 Speaking of which, Colorado State lost to Colorado 17-38. Figures. I watched a good portion of the game and some of the play calling made me scratch my head. Twice on 3rd down, once on a 3rd and 7, the other on a 3rd in 4, he ran screen passes. The first was a WR Bubble screen, and the other was one to the FB. It should be noted that they have a talented RB that was gouging the Buffaloes for yards on every carry, but they opted to throw the second screen pass to a slower RB. He does have a lot of work to do however...they looked decent at times, other times, they weren't good at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taro T Posted September 1, 2008 Share Posted September 1, 2008 That is ... interesting, isn't it? And I've been one of McNally's steadfast defenders. As you say, we'll see what it looks like in the regular season, and (hopefully) with 71 back in the lineup at some point. Interesting is a good word for it. The guy did a fantastic job at his past stops, I really had high hopes for what he could do here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sisyphean Bills Posted September 1, 2008 Share Posted September 1, 2008 That's nothing. I heard some yo-yo, er, expert, that said the Bills had a "great offense and defense" last year and, of course, were a fantastic dark horse pick this year a while back. He also mentioned the classic "until they lost nearly every one of their defensive starters" line as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwampD Posted September 1, 2008 Share Posted September 1, 2008 Why was that D comment off? Last year we were ranked 8th in points, 7th in yards defensively. That's pretty darn good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwampD Posted September 1, 2008 Share Posted September 1, 2008 Why was that D comment off? Last year we were ranked 8th in points, 7th in yards defensively. That's pretty darn good. sorry wrong year. 15th in points and 2nd in yards. Still pretty good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lori Posted September 1, 2008 Share Posted September 1, 2008 Um, no. Bills D was 31st in total yards allowed, 25th in rush yards allowed, 29th in passing yards allowed, 18th in points allowed in 2007. Source: NFL Game Statistics & Information System. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sisyphean Bills Posted September 1, 2008 Share Posted September 1, 2008 That is ... interesting, isn't it? And I've been one of McNally's steadfast defenders. As you say, we'll see what it looks like in the regular season, and (hopefully) with 71 back in the lineup at some point. You know better than to put a lot of stock in preseason scrimmages. Wasn't McNally the guy that developed Jason Peters? Didn't the line come together last year and do pretty well in pass pro? I don't think you should be eager to go 180 and throw McNally under the bus wheels. Pardon me if I need to see Schonert going up against a defense with a real game plan to stop him before assuming he walks on water. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drnykterstein Posted September 1, 2008 Share Posted September 1, 2008 Peerless Price? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OCinBuffalo Posted September 1, 2008 Share Posted September 1, 2008 Um, no. Bills D was 31st in total yards allowed, 25th in rush yards allowed, 29th in passing yards allowed, 18th in points allowed in 2007. Source: NFL Game Statistics & Information System. This is what makes me think our D last year, and now, is better than the #s suggest. Let's face it, with the way the O played last year...(IMO this is starting to look more and more like Fairchild's fault-->Hamdan? driving the ball down the field all game with second teamers and a LT who has barely been in pads for 2 years?)...the D was on the field way more often than they should have been, thus giving opponents more time to rack up stats against them. But, when you look at the amount of points allowed, they move up significantly, and this is the most important team D stat anyway. I'll look for some sort of yards/# of times defense on the field stat.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts