Chilly Posted December 15, 2006 Share Posted December 15, 2006 Would you put Vick at RB the other 25% of the time? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikie2times Posted December 15, 2006 Share Posted December 15, 2006 Ok. Let me edit my post so that people who don't want to engage their brain can understand what my post originally meant. "I would not put Vick at RB. I would put Vick at Wide Receiver if ANYTHING. Like Reggie Bush is at WR 75% of the game (yes even though he is LISTED at RB)." Is that better? 867263[/snapback] 75%? I wan't proof Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikie2times Posted December 15, 2006 Share Posted December 15, 2006 Would you put Vick at RB the other 25% of the time? 867266[/snapback] Why not have him return punts, Reggie Bush does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daquixers_is_back Posted December 15, 2006 Share Posted December 15, 2006 Would you put Vick at RB the other 25% of the time? 867266[/snapback] Possibly ... but he could be at RB and catch out on the flats ... etc. Why not have him return punts, Reggie Bush does. 867269[/snapback] Thats something I was just about to post actually ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fezmid Posted December 15, 2006 Share Posted December 15, 2006 Possibly ... but he could be at RB and catch out on the flats ... etc.Thats something I was just about to post actually ... 867275[/snapback] I heard that Vick and Bush are both hardcore gamers and that both love playing Nintendo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bungee Jumper Posted December 15, 2006 Share Posted December 15, 2006 I think its funny how you guys tried to make me look dumb ... just look at the stats. Bush is on pace for a 97 reception, 850 receiving yard year ... as I said. A Reggie Bush type. 867241[/snapback] I think it's funnier how you look dumb all on your own... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeF Posted December 15, 2006 Share Posted December 15, 2006 I think it's funnier how you look dumb all on your own... 867288[/snapback] Hanging curve ball....oooooh, the parks not going to hold that one..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted December 15, 2006 Share Posted December 15, 2006 Actually if you really want to debate this, one could say that Bush "plays" WR and is "listed" at RB ... look at the carries to receiving ratio. He is basically half RB/half WR Ok. Let me edit my post so that people who don't want to engage their brain can understand what my post originally meant. "I would not put Vick at RB. I would put Vick at Wide Receiver if ANYTHING. Like Reggie Bush is at WR 75% of the game (yes even though he is LISTED at RB)." Is that better? 867263[/snapback] No, worse. Because it's dumb AND not true. Especially since there have been a hundreds of RBs over the years that sometimes or even often split out wide to get them short passes. But there have been virtually a handful of WRs who shift back behind the QB and take handoffs for more than a few carries a season. What you should have said is simple. They should use him at RB the way the Saints use Bush at RB, by half the time shifting him outside and throwing short passes to him to get him into the open field and keep him from getting killed by linemen and linebackers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daquixers_is_back Posted December 15, 2006 Share Posted December 15, 2006 I heard that Vick and Bush are both hardcore gamers and that both love playing Nintendo. 867278[/snapback] No, worse. Because it's dumb AND not true. Especially since there have been a hundreds of RBs over the years that sometimes or even often split out wide to get them short passes. But there have been virtually a handful of WRs who shift back behind the QB and take handoffs for more than a few carries a season. What you should have said is simple. They should use him at RB the way the Saints use Bush at RB, by half the time shifting him outside and throwing short passes to him to get him into the open field and keep him from getting killed by linemen and linebackers.867311[/snapback] Which is EXACTLY what I meant. I figured by saying a Reggie Bush TYPE of player, people would have understood what I meant. Obviously not. Note, I NEVER said a Reggie Bush POSITION, I said a Reggie Bush TYPE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted December 15, 2006 Share Posted December 15, 2006 Which is EXACTLY what I meant. I figured by saying a Reggie Bush TYPE of player, people would have understood what I meant. Obviously not. Note, I NEVER said a Reggie Bush POSITION, I said a Reggie Bush TYPE. 867315[/snapback] who cares Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chilly Posted December 15, 2006 Share Posted December 15, 2006 whocares 867316[/snapback] Reggie Bush isn't a WR though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted December 15, 2006 Share Posted December 15, 2006 Reggie Bush isn't a WR though 867318[/snapback] don't be anal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daquixers_is_back Posted December 15, 2006 Share Posted December 15, 2006 Reggie Bush isn't a WR though 867318[/snapback] don't be anal. 867319[/snapback] He is just being ridiculous. Both of them knew EXACTLY what I meant from the first post and are just being retarded about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chilly Posted December 15, 2006 Share Posted December 15, 2006 don't be anal. 867319[/snapback] don't be azzaem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted December 15, 2006 Share Posted December 15, 2006 don't be azzaem. 867322[/snapback] I'll try my best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chilly Posted December 15, 2006 Share Posted December 15, 2006 He is just being ridiculous. Both of them knew EXACTLY what I meant from the first post and are just being retarded about it. 867321[/snapback] I think we should make Royal into a good WR like Antonio Gates. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daquixers_is_back Posted December 15, 2006 Share Posted December 15, 2006 I think we should make Royal into a good WR like Antonio Gates. 867328[/snapback] Actually that makes total sense to me. Especially if you said "i think we should make Royal a WR ... more of a Antonio Gates type of player" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted December 15, 2006 Share Posted December 15, 2006 Which is EXACTLY what I meant. I figured by saying a Reggie Bush TYPE of player, people would have understood what I meant. Obviously not. Note, I NEVER said a Reggie Bush POSITION, I said a Reggie Bush TYPE. 867315[/snapback] But you said receiver. As in, when someone suggested Vick was going to play RB, you said: "I would think it would be smarter to make Vick a receiver." And then when people called you on it, you spent a few posts saying he lines up as WR. You're right though. I knew what you meant, even though you said the opposite. And I was thinking that it maybe a great idea for the Bills to line-up and play Losman at TE, only have him move over behind the center and then throw it like a QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daquixers_is_back Posted December 15, 2006 Share Posted December 15, 2006 But you said receiver. As in, when someone suggested Vick was going to play RB, you said: I would think it would be smarter to make Vick a receiver. And then when people called you on it, you spent a few posts saying he lines up as WR. You right though. I knew what you meant, even though you said the opposite. And I was thinking that it maybe a great idea for the Bills to line-up and play Losman at TE, only have him move over behind the center and then throw it like a QB. 867336[/snapback] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramius Posted December 15, 2006 Share Posted December 15, 2006 I think its funny how you guys tried to make me look dumb 867241[/snapback] They really dont have to try. you tend to take care of that fairly well yourself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts