HelloNewman Posted November 8, 2006 Share Posted November 8, 2006 pretty much sums up your typical closed-minded conservative bible thumping intolerant who attacks anyone who disagrees with their views. Typical Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spidey Posted November 8, 2006 Share Posted November 8, 2006 pretty much sums up your typical closed-minded conservative bible thumping intolerant who attacks anyone who disagrees with their views. Typical 829955[/snapback] yeah and in some cases talk about how your against gays while your getting "favors" from a male prostitute etc. But both sides are full of hipocrits and until we get real election reforms its what we will see. but good to see the party of hate has lsot its strangle hold Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike1011 Posted November 8, 2006 Share Posted November 8, 2006 pretty much sums up your typical closed-minded conservative bible thumping intolerant who attacks anyone who disagrees with their views. Typical 829955[/snapback] Liberals are the most closed-minded of all. When you mention Intelligent Design as an alternative to Evolution you hear it's a religious belief when it fact it's not. Evolution is simply a theory turned into infallible in every way without proof of macro-evolution, or without current species mutating anywhere on the planet. Abortion is a women's right to "chose", but chose what? When someone is pro-life they chose life. To chose a choice is tautological and intellectually dishonest. They chose death, and where are those people who support a child's right to live in schools? They don't have a platform in public education and I have never seen any teacher explain the mental ramifications of abortion, which is exceptionally high, or the increased risk of breast cancer caused by abortions which is supported by 3 independent studies. If a corporation doesn't want to hire a homosexual they call that discrimation. Why can't they be open to our decision that it's immoral? Why must lawyers sue us into their belief that it's morally neutral? If Christians hire Christians only it's wrong and descrimating, but if Masons hire Masons it's ok? Do you want case example? You can't mention Christmas or a Nativity scene now in school, yet they had Muslim sensitivity training after 9/11. Kids get thrown out of school for pro-life t-shirts yet if you wear a Marilyn Manson shirt such incidents aren't an issue. Men cannot have strictly male jobs (like firemen), but if a male applies to Hooters why shouldn't they hire him under the same auspices? Frankly, you are blind if you don't see the hypocrisy in the matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UConn James Posted November 8, 2006 Share Posted November 8, 2006 Liberals are the most closed-minded of all. When you mention Intelligent Design as an alternative to Evolution you hear it's a religious belief when it fact it's not. Evolution is simply a theory turned into infallible in every way without proof of macro-evolution, or without current species mutating anywhere on the planet. Abortion is a women's right to "chose", but chose what? When someone is pro-life they chose life. To chose a choice is tautological and intellectually dishonest. They chose death, and where are those people who support a child's right to live in schools? They don't have a platform in public education and I have never seen any teacher explain the mental ramifications of abortion, which is exceptionally high, or the increased risk of breast cancer caused by abortions which is supported by 3 independent studies. If a corporation doesn't want to hire a homosexual they call that discrimation. Why can't they be open to our decision that it's immoral? Why must lawyers sue us into their belief that it's morally neutral? If Christians hire Christians only it's wrong and descrimating, but if Masons hire Masons it's ok? Do you want case example? You can't mention Christmas or a Nativity scene now in school, yet they had Muslim sensitivity training after 9/11. Kids get thrown out of school for pro-life t-shirts yet if you wear a Marilyn Manson shirt such incidents aren't an issue. Men cannot have strictly male jobs (like firemen), but if a male applies to Hooters why shouldn't they hire him under the same auspices? Frankly, you are blind if you don't see the hypocrisy in the matter. 830095[/snapback] My brain started hurting with "[no] current species mutating".... That right there tells me you have NO. !@#$. CLUE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Posted November 8, 2006 Share Posted November 8, 2006 My brain started hurting with "[no] current species mutating".... That right there tells me you have NO. !@#$. CLUE. 830108[/snapback] I check out my bird feeders all the time and I've never seen a bird mutate one single time. Evolution is obviously a crock...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chilly Posted November 9, 2006 Share Posted November 9, 2006 Liberals are the most closed-minded of all. When you mention Intelligent Design as an alternative to Evolution you hear it's a religious belief when it fact it's not. Evolution is simply a theory turned into infallible in every way without proof of macro-evolution, or without current species mutating anywhere on the planet. Intelligent Design is perfectly fine as long as you are willing to look at all theories. I subscribe to this one personally. Abortion is a women's right to "chose", but chose what? When someone is pro-life they chose life. To chose a choice is tautological and intellectually dishonest. They chose death, and where are those people who support a child's right to live in schools? They don't have a platform in public education and I have never seen any teacher explain the mental ramifications of abortion, which is exceptionally high, or the increased risk of breast cancer caused by abortions which is supported by 3 independent studies. lol, "intellectually dishonest". Actually, they prefer legislation that lets each person make up their minds individually on abortion. Therefore, its pro-choice. Thats not intellectually dishonest; you calling the people who are "pro-choice" as having "chose death" is dishonest. I don't know anyone who is pro-choice that is also pro-abortion. If a corporation doesn't want to hire a homosexual they call that discrimation. Why can't they be open to our decision that it's immoral? Why must lawyers sue us into their belief that it's morally neutral? If Christians hire Christians only it's wrong and descrimating, but if Masons hire Masons it's ok? Do you want case example? The reason why is discrimination is because it has nothing to do with negative job performance. A homosexual will perform most jobs (except perhaps straight porn) just as well as a heterosexual. Therefore, discrimination based upon this is wrong. If Masons are allowed to discriminate based upon the membership to the fraternity (I'm not familiar with those cases), my thinking would be because it is classified as a fraternity and not a religion. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 doesn't ban all discrimination. You can't mention Christmas or a Nativity scene now in school, yet they had Muslim sensitivity training after 9/11. Kids get thrown out of school for pro-life t-shirts yet if you wear a Marilyn Manson shirt such incidents aren't an issue. Muslim sensitivity training is important because schools should be accepting of different religions and promote tolerance of all. I personally don't think that banning religion from school is the answer, but in no way do I think that promoting religion in school is the answer either (prayer, etc). It lies somewhere in between. Men cannot have strictly male jobs (like firemen), but if a male applies to Hooters why shouldn't they hire him under the same auspices? This has been brought to lawsuits before, but they've all been settled out of court and nothing has been brought to serious trial yet as far as I know. The EEOC has also ran campaigns against Hooters' hiring practices. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted November 9, 2006 Share Posted November 9, 2006 pretty much sums up your typical closed-minded conservative bible thumping intolerant who attacks anyone who disagrees with their views. Typical 829955[/snapback] Please explain how the Democrats are different. Be specific. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UConn James Posted November 9, 2006 Share Posted November 9, 2006 Intelligent Design is perfectly fine as long as you are willing to look at all theories. I subscribe to this one personally. lol, "intellectually dishonest". Actually, they prefer legislation that lets each person make up their minds individually on abortion. Therefore, its pro-choice. Thats not intellectually dishonest; you calling the people who are "pro-choice" as having "chose death" is dishonest. I don't know anyone who is pro-choice that is also pro-abortion. Oh, come on now! I see people all the time outside of the clinics holding signs that read, "Kill those fetuses DEAD!" And when you compare their ID cards to the voter rolls? All Democrats! If Masons are allowed to discriminate based upon the membership to the fraternity (I'm not familiar with those cases), my thinking would be because it is classified as a fraternity and not a religion. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 doesn't ban all discrimination. Masons hire Masons b/c they're the only ones who know the supersecret handshake and have the hammer birthmarks. Does this kind of 'discrimination' also apply to how so many head people in the admin are Skull & Bones? The EEOC has also ran campaigns against Hooters' hiring practices. Screw that. What I want to know about is "Men cannot have strictly male jobs (like firemen)." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_fumbles Posted November 9, 2006 Share Posted November 9, 2006 Liberals are the most closed-minded of all. When you mention Intelligent Design as an alternative to Evolution you hear it's a religious belief when it fact it's not. Evolution is simply a theory turned into infallible in every way without proof of macro-evolution, or without current species mutating anywhere on the planet. Abortion is a women's right to "chose", but chose what? When someone is pro-life they chose life. To chose a choice is tautological and intellectually dishonest. They chose death, and where are those people who support a child's right to live in schools? They don't have a platform in public education and I have never seen any teacher explain the mental ramifications of abortion, which is exceptionally high, or the increased risk of breast cancer caused by abortions which is supported by 3 independent studies. If a corporation doesn't want to hire a homosexual they call that discrimation. Why can't they be open to our decision that it's immoral? Why must lawyers sue us into their belief that it's morally neutral? If Christians hire Christians only it's wrong and descrimating, but if Masons hire Masons it's ok? Do you want case example? You can't mention Christmas or a Nativity scene now in school, yet they had Muslim sensitivity training after 9/11. Kids get thrown out of school for pro-life t-shirts yet if you wear a Marilyn Manson shirt such incidents aren't an issue. Men cannot have strictly male jobs (like firemen), but if a male applies to Hooters why shouldn't they hire him under the same auspices? Frankly, you are blind if you don't see the hypocrisy in the matter. 830095[/snapback] Do you think Terri Schivo's 'absentee Ballot' should be counted? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bungee Jumper Posted November 9, 2006 Share Posted November 9, 2006 Liberals are the most closed-minded of all. When you mention Intelligent Design as an alternative to Evolution you hear it's a religious belief when it fact it's not. Evolution is simply a theory turned into infallible in every way without proof of macro-evolution, or without current species mutating anywhere on the planet. 830095[/snapback] Intelligent design is religion. It's not testable, and not falsifiable, ergo not science. Period. End of discussion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chilly Posted November 9, 2006 Share Posted November 9, 2006 Intelligent design is religion. It's not testable, and not falsifiable, ergo not science. Period. End of discussion. 830298[/snapback] But what about the Flying Spaghetti Monster? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bungee Jumper Posted November 9, 2006 Share Posted November 9, 2006 But what about the Flying Spaghetti Monster? 830300[/snapback] His Noodly Appendage is religion. Sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chilly Posted November 9, 2006 Share Posted November 9, 2006 His Noodly Appendage is religion. Sorry. 830302[/snapback] The Flying Spaghetti Monster is higher then religion! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts