Max997 Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 this rumor keeps coming up, they didnt get into details except to say they continue to talk about swapping first round picks...i just hope Marv doesnt make the trade until they are on the clock and D'Brick is gone ( or if he goes higher ), they have to wait and see if they can get lucky and have D'Brick fall to them the Eagles want a DT and it was initially thought they wanted Ngata but they actually want Bunkley who fits their style of defense better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roscoeparrishfan Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 As much as I like D'Brick I'd be happier if we trade down and get exta picks. The more picks we get the better the chances are to get lucky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Original Byrd Man Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 As much as I like D'Brick I'd be happier if we trade down and get exta picks. The more picks we get the better the chances are to get lucky. 673960[/snapback] I agree. We need more picks in a draft that is light on top shelf talent but fat on good to very good. More bodies=more potential to find that diamond in the rough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of BiB Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 I agree. We need more picks in a draft that is light on top shelf talent but fat on good to very good. More bodies=more potential to find that diamond in the rough. 673972[/snapback] Not to mention cheaper by the dozen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffBills#1 Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 I wonder who we want at 14? Ngata probably will be gone, but there is a chance Justice will be there. M. Williams Bush Lienert Young D. Ferguson A. Hawk V. Davis M. Huff J. Cutler B. Bunkley Those players will all be gone by the 14th pick so that leaves a 50/50 chance that either Justice or Ngata will be there at 14th. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crackur Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 Not to mention cheaper by the dozen. 673976[/snapback] yeah thats the NEW BILLS ERA lets get washed up/ cheap players I want to sit on the 8th pick and take the best available player screw extra picks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EC-Bills Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 I agree. We need more picks in a draft that is light on top shelf talent but fat on good to very good. More bodies=more potential to find that diamond in the rough. 673972[/snapback] Exactly, that was JJ's philosophy in Dallas and Miami and it usually worked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roscoeparrishfan Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 yeah thats the NEW BILLS ERA lets get washed up/ cheap players I want to sit on the 8th pick and take the best available player screw extra picks 673987[/snapback] Yeah Because we are only that one great player away Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crackur Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 Yeah Because we are only that one great player away 674000[/snapback] wel if your ok with mediocre then let's go with it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsGuyInMalta Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 wel if your ok with mediocre then let's go with it 674002[/snapback] Clearly, everyone outside of pick #8 is going to be a huge flop in the NFL... We need as many picks as we can get, and its not like we're even dropping that far. To go from 8 to 14 still nets you a strong starter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of BiB Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 Clearly, everyone outside of pick #8 is going to be a huge flop in the NFL... We need as many picks as we can get, and its not like we're even dropping that far. To go from 8 to 14 still nets you a strong starter. 674039[/snapback] But...but...SHINY THINGS!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max997 Posted April 29, 2006 Author Share Posted April 29, 2006 wel if your ok with mediocre then let's go with it 674002[/snapback] how is dropping six spots to 14 and picking up another pick in the top 45 mediocre...and quite possibly still getting the player they want at 14 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Jokeman Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 Clearly, everyone outside of pick #8 is going to be a huge flop in the NFL... We need as many picks as we can get, and its not like we're even dropping that far. To go from 8 to 14 still nets you a strong starter. 674039[/snapback] Like any position in the draft #14 would be a crap shoot but it looks to be a 50/50 crap shoot recently. 2005: 1 14 14 Thomas Davis Panthers DB Georgia 2004: 1 14 14 Tommie Harris Bears DT Oklahoma 2003: 1 14 14 Michael Haynes Bears DE Penn State 2002: 1 14 14 Jeremy Shockey Giants TE Miami (FL) 2001: 1 14 14 Kenyatta Walker Buccaneers T Florida compared to #8 which has been a little more safer. 2005: 1 8 8 Antrel Rolle Cardinals DB Miami (FL) 2004: 1 8 8 DeAngelo Hall Falcons DB Virginia Tech 2003: 1 8 8 Jordan Gross Panthers T Utah 2002: 1 8 8 Roy Williams Cowboys DB Oklahoma 2001: 1 8 8 David Terrell Bears WR Michigan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsGuyInMalta Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 Like any position in the draft #14 would be a crap shoot but it looks to be a 50/50 crap shoot recently. 2005: 1 14 14 Thomas Davis Panthers DB Georgia 2004: 1 14 14 Tommie Harris Bears DT Oklahoma 2003: 1 14 14 Michael Haynes Bears DE Penn State 2002: 1 14 14 Jeremy Shockey Giants TE Miami (FL) 2001: 1 14 14 Kenyatta Walker Buccaneers T Florida compared to #8 which has been a little more safer. 2005: 1 8 8 Antrel Rolle Cardinals DB Miami (FL) 2004: 1 8 8 DeAngelo Hall Falcons DB Virginia Tech 2003: 1 8 8 Jordan Gross Panthers T Utah 2002: 1 8 8 Roy Williams Cowboys DB Oklahoma 2001: 1 8 8 David Terrell Bears WR Michigan 674054[/snapback] Not that much safer...out of the 14th picks I think Davis, Harris and Shockey have turned (or will turn if Davis' rookie year is any indication) into very good pros. Out of the 8th pick, Hall, Gross and Williams look to be good NFL players. Terrell is...well, I dont have to go there, guy is flop city. And Rolle, just like in college, has trouble staying healthy...only managed 5 games this season. So 3 studs for 14th and 3 studs for 8th. I'd still trade down and pick up a 2nd if given the chance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max997 Posted April 29, 2006 Author Share Posted April 29, 2006 Like any position in the draft #14 would be a crap shoot but it looks to be a 50/50 crap shoot recently. 2005: 1 14 14 Thomas Davis Panthers DB Georgia 2004: 1 14 14 Tommie Harris Bears DT Oklahoma 2003: 1 14 14 Michael Haynes Bears DE Penn State 2002: 1 14 14 Jeremy Shockey Giants TE Miami (FL) 2001: 1 14 14 Kenyatta Walker Buccaneers T Florida compared to #8 which has been a little more safer. 2005: 1 8 8 Antrel Rolle Cardinals DB Miami (FL) 2004: 1 8 8 DeAngelo Hall Falcons DB Virginia Tech 2003: 1 8 8 Jordan Gross Panthers T Utah 2002: 1 8 8 Roy Williams Cowboys DB Oklahoma 2001: 1 8 8 David Terrell Bears WR Michigan 674054[/snapback] WOW I still cant believe the Bears took D.Terrell Tommie Harris was a STEAL for the Bears at 14 in 2004 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KOKBILLS Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 WOW I still cant believe the Bears took D.Terrell 674067[/snapback] Well I know this is the Michigan Homer in me talking, but Terrell was a hell of a good College WR...I watched just about ever one of his Games in College and I was convinced he would be a productive NFL WR...He's one of my favorite Wolverines right behind Woodson, Hutch, and Braylon Edwards... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max997 Posted April 29, 2006 Author Share Posted April 29, 2006 Well I know this is the Michigan Homer in me talking, but Terrell was a hell of a good College WR...I watched just about ever one of his Games in College and I was convinced he would be a productive NFL WR...He's one of my favorite Wolverines right behind Woodson, Hutch, and Braylon Edwards... 674113[/snapback] Michigan WRs just dont normally produce in the NFL A.Toomer has had a nice career but he was never an elite receiver B.Edwards will change all that however Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsGuyInMalta Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 Well I know this is the Michigan Homer in me talking, but Terrell was a hell of a good College WR...I watched just about ever one of his Games in College and I was convinced he would be a productive NFL WR...He's one of my favorite Wolverines right behind Woodson, Hutch, and Braylon Edwards... 674113[/snapback] I agree, I mean in retrospect it doesnt look like a good move but at the time Terrell looked to be a budding star. But alas...the Michigan WR curse struck him down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rico Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 I agree, I mean in retrospect it doesnt look like a good move but at the time Terrell looked to be a budding star. But alas...the Michigan WR curse struck him down. 674126[/snapback] The Florida WR curse is even worse though...that's why I want the Felons to take Chad Jackson, may be the next Yatil Green! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KOKBILLS Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 The Florida WR curse is even worse though...that's why I want the Felons to take Chad Jackson, may be the next Yatil Green! 674134[/snapback] From Your Keyboard to God's ears Bro... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts