Billsjunkie Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 How 'bout Moulds to Philly for Hollis Thomas and a 2nd round pick? 638812[/snapback] It would have to be a 3rd IMO. Value for WR in trades is very small. Hollis Thomas and a 3rd would be far. Maybe even a 4th. I would rather just take a 2nd rounder from a winning team or an early third. Some great talent in the 2nd and third rounds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Like A Mofo Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 Hey they gave us a first for Price. Maybe it will work again with Eric. 638813[/snapback] If the Bills even got a 4th for Moulds I would be thrilled. I was always a big Moulds fan, but if he wants to go, then go. Would rather see the Bills draft a WR in the 3rd round and groom him with Evans, Davis, and Parrish. Bills are in rebuilding mode. When making the team younger, might as well go all the way and send Moulds on his merry way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billsjunkie Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 If the Bills even got a 4th for Moulds I would be thrilled. I was always a big Moulds fan, but if he wants to go, then go. Would rather see the Bills draft a WR in the 3rd round and groom him with Evans, Davis, and Parrish. Bills are in rebuilding mode. When making the team younger, might as well go all the way and send Moulds on his merry way. 638818[/snapback] I agree I think a 4th is more likely. Wideouts just dont have value in trades. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Quebecer Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 If Doug Jolley could costed the Jets a 1st round pick, Moulds should bring at least a second, if n ot a 1st... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billsjunkie Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 If Doug Jolley could get the Jets a 1st round pick, Moulds should bring at least a second, if n ot a 1st... 638823[/snapback] Good TEs are harder to come by though. Thats why the 1st round value. WR just dont have that value in trades. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Like A Mofo Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 I agree I think a 4th is more likely. Wideouts just dont have value in trades. 638822[/snapback] Absolutely...let's look at it this way: A 4th is better then ZERO and right now the mentaility needs to be at OBD..you do not want to be here, see ya....again I would rather see Moulds stay....but for his price and his mindset...bye bye Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silvermike Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 Well, let's see what we've got: AE: Nothing, we're not trading in the division AN: Nothing: Pittsburgh is all set, Cleveland made the moves, Baltimore has Mason and a young Clayton, and Cincy has #85 and Housh. AS: Tennessee? Not much besides Givens, who's not really a #1. Indy is set, the Jags are deep, and Houston has more pressing problems (though who IS their #2?) AW: Denver, yes. Kansas City, yes. Oakland no, but San Diego only has a very old McCardell NE: Philly of course, everyone else had made their splash NN: Minnesota? Only Burleson and Williamson, neither of whom is very good. Green Bay if they lose Walker, Detriot because it's Millen, and Chicago lost out on ARE. NS: Atlanta needs one, but can't add it; Carolina's stable, New Orleans...too far away from a run, and Tampa has Clayton and Galloway. NW: Seattle, no. San Francisco? Only has Bryant. The Rams are fine, and the Cards are fine. So possibly some nibbles there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 Absolutely...let's look at it this way: A 4th is better then ZERO and right now the mentaility needs to be at OBD..you do not want to be here, see ya....again I would rather see Moulds stay....but for his price and his mindset...bye bye 638826[/snapback] I just noticed your "New Jersey, The Tax State" profile line. Enjoying your new Governor? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Like A Mofo Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 I just noticed your "New Jersey, The Tax State" profile line. Enjoying your new Governor? 638831[/snapback] He's dead to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoachChuckDickerson Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 If Doug Jolley could costed the Jets a 1st round pick, Moulds should bring at least a second, if n ot a 1st... 638823[/snapback] You're not going to get a 1st for a 32 year old WR on the decline . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
d_wag Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 If Doug Jolley could costed the Jets a 1st round pick, Moulds should bring at least a second, if n ot a 1st... 638823[/snapback] the jets did not trade a 1st just for jolley......there were numerous picks involved, including the raiders 2nd rounder....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 Well, let's see what we've got: ...and Houston has more pressing problems (though who IS their #2?) 638830[/snapback] They signed 7th rounder RFA WR Kevin Walter away from Cincy. The B'gals tendered $717,000, but HOU gave him 6.1 million over 4 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nobody Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 The Bills will be lucky if they get a 4th. 5th or 6th seems more possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuntheDamnBall Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 The Bills will be lucky if they get a 4th. 5th or 6th seems more possible. 638843[/snapback] Some were saying the same thing about T. Henry last year. Wait and see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phlegm Alley Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 If and when EM is traded or released, regardless of our deficiency at the DT and OL positions, I think that this will open up a greater possibility to drafting Vernon Davis in an attempt to bolster our passing game and give us a more legitimate threat to attack through the air. This is only if Marv and co. are not that high on Ngata because of his size resemblance to Sam Adams or they think that Bunkley may be too much of a reach with # 8. Of course we could always trade down... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nobody Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 Some were saying the same thing about T. Henry last year. Wait and see. 638846[/snapback] Henry was making coins compared to Moulds (and compared to other RBs). Due to Moulds contract I think that reduces his trade value. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuntheDamnBall Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 Henry was making coins compared to Moulds (and compared to other RBs). Due to Moulds contract I think that reduces his trade value. 638852[/snapback] Depends. Some team might feel there is possibility for a restructure / pay cut if they are "good enough" to warrant it for the good of the team. I'm sure that's part of the discussions Moulds and his stupid advisors are having with other franchises. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mile High Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 How about this scenario on draft day. Trade Denver our #8 pick and Eric Moulds for their first two picks in the draft #22 and #29. I read that they are in love with Jay Cutler. If they like him that much they'd give it up. Or our #8 and Eric, for #22 and #61 overall. Just something to think about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Realist Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 NS: Atlanta needs one, but can't add it; Carolina's stable, New Orleans...too far away from a run, and Tampa has Clayton and Galloway. 638830[/snapback] Don't know how Moulds would react, but Carolina could use a #2 receiver. After Steve Smith, they don't have anyone. If a team was able to take Smith out of the picture last year, Delhomme had nowhere to go. Those were the games they lost or were in deep schitt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buftex Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 Don't know how Moulds would react, but Carolina could use a #2 receiver. After Steve Smith, they don't have anyone. If a team was able to take Smith out of the picture last year, Delhomme had nowhere to go. Those were the games they lost or were in deep schitt. 638867[/snapback] Keyshawn Johnson was actively lobbying Carolina for a job, the last few days...when they said "no thanks", he agreed to play for the Giants... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts