MadBuffaloDisease Posted September 27, 2004 Share Posted September 27, 2004 What does that say about the QB position? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crackur Posted September 27, 2004 Share Posted September 27, 2004 they should of lost that game a million times......Iwatched it..........they should have never took Josh out of the game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jarthur31 Posted September 27, 2004 Share Posted September 27, 2004 What does that say about the QB position? 46365[/snapback] Wow, their line must've been "offensive"! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted September 27, 2004 Share Posted September 27, 2004 He also had a 58 yard run to set up the winning FG. Can you imagine Drew running for 58 yards? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadBuffaloDisease Posted September 27, 2004 Author Share Posted September 27, 2004 He also had a 58 yard run to set up the winning FG. Can you imagine Drew running for 58 yards? 46375[/snapback] Ding! That 58 yard run was at the end of the game. The Falcons scored their last points (FG) 3 minutes into the 2nd quarter. Wow! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rico Posted September 27, 2004 Share Posted September 27, 2004 Can you imagine Drew running for 58 yards? 46375[/snapback] But I can see JP running for 58 yards! GET WELL JP!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MartyBall4Buffalo Posted September 27, 2004 Share Posted September 27, 2004 OH YES there is nothing I want to see more than my teams QUARTERBACK running 58 yards The quarterback position is meant for guys to pass the ball. You can keep your new age trendy running qb's. Give me a guy back there who can sit in the pocket, and tear you up with his arm and accuracy. Than I'll be impressed. Leave the running to the running backs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YOOOOOO Posted September 27, 2004 Share Posted September 27, 2004 He also had a 58 yard run to set up the winning FG. Can you imagine Drew running for 58 yards? 46375[/snapback] The 58 yard run came after the 3rd Redzone TurnOver by the Cardinals at the end of the game.......ATL should have lost but once again the Cards blew it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tux of Borg Posted September 27, 2004 Share Posted September 27, 2004 OH YES there is nothing I want to see more than my teams QUARTERBACK running 58 yards The quarterback position is meant for guys to pass the ball. You can keep your new age trendy running qb's. Give me a guy back there who can sit in the pocket, and tear you up with his arm and accuracy. Than I'll be impressed. Leave the running to the running backs 46390[/snapback] Vick is a halfback with an arm. College football is full of them, and the NFL is starting to become that way. I think Atlanta figured out if Vick gets hurt, their season is over. That's why they tried making him a pocket passer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sweet baboo Posted September 27, 2004 Share Posted September 27, 2004 Vick *shakes head* is my starting QB in one of my fantasy leagues his style of play isn't going to put up alot of points in this style of offense and against real teams, he can't lead them to win Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njsue Posted September 27, 2004 Share Posted September 27, 2004 You call 6 points a great win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted September 27, 2004 Share Posted September 27, 2004 I would call any Bills win a great win. And to be honest with you as long as Drew is our QB if we do win we are not gonna score too much more then 6 points Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njsue Posted September 27, 2004 Share Posted September 27, 2004 DREW IS THE BEST DAMN QB THE BILLS HAVE HAD SINCE JIM KELLY RETIRED. I believe the reason JIM KELLY retired a year too soon. BECAUSE HIS OFFENSIVE LINE WAS TRYING TO GET HIM KILLED. STOP WHINING THAT DREW IS BAD, CAUSE HE IS NOT. MCNABB & WARNER HAVE MUCH IMPROVED OFFENSIVE LINE. CAUSE THAT WAS AN IMMEDIATE ISSUE WITH BOTH HC'S. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted September 27, 2004 Share Posted September 27, 2004 DREW IS THE BEST DAMN QB THE BILLS HAVE HAD SINCE JIM KELLY RETIRED. You mean he is better then Billy Joe Hobert? Todd Collins? Alex Van Pelt? I am impressed! BTW Drew cannot hold RJs jock strap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fezmid Posted September 27, 2004 Share Posted September 27, 2004 I find it funny that some people are saying Vick won the game and that DB would never have won it. If DB *had* won the game 6-3, and had the exact same numbers as Vick everyone would be saying: "He only threw for 115 yards, he sucks!" "Can you believe that he fumbled the ball TWICE?!?! We won despite DB, not because of him!" "Holy crap, why'd he run that ball when he had a WIDE OPEN receiver. He's trying to get himself killed! God he SUCKS!" "He turned the ball over *3* times! BENCH HIM AND PUT IN JP!!!! JP with a broken leg would be better than Bledsoe!" "We scored a whole 6 points?! Whoop-de-doo, we're going to get crushed the rest of the season and go 1-15!" And sadly, I'm not even joking here... BTW, he scored negative points in my fantasy league this week; I would've been better off starting Brady this week, and Brady didn't even play. However, if K. Johnson scores a TD for Dallas tonight, I win anyway (and I played against Payton Manning!). CW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gantrules Posted September 27, 2004 Share Posted September 27, 2004 Vick is the most overrated, overhyped, crappy QB in the history of the game. Oh, yeah....the Falcons were 11-5-1 and beat the Packers with him in Labeau two years ago in the playoffs and they are 3-0 with him this year. But, they were real successful with him out.....5-11. I'd rather have VICK in a second over Drew. His wideouts stink. Peerless is not a number 1 reciever by any stretch of the imagination. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zow2 Posted September 27, 2004 Share Posted September 27, 2004 Speaking of Peerless, has there ever been a bigger waste of money in football history than this guy? I have the misfortune of having Price on my fantasy team so I know his stats this year, and they SUCK! I've watched two Falcons games and they don't even throw his way since he's never open. Then they try to force him the ball or they give him a reverse to run for about 5 yards. Last year it was blamed on Vick being injured. This year what's his excuse? It's sad when Alge Crumpler is a much more integral part of the offense than PP. PP is the classic example of free agency gone bad (not for $$, but for his career production). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffOrange Posted September 27, 2004 Share Posted September 27, 2004 Man, do we really have to endure these "Quarterback X had a bad game, so our guy isn't so bad" posts this year? It was the same thing when the Midget was here. Whenever Favre had a bad game, Flake fans would always point it out. I'm not saying Vick is Favre, or that Vick is even good at this point. I just know our QB stinks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffOrange Posted September 27, 2004 Share Posted September 27, 2004 Vick is the most overrated, overhyped, crappy QB in the history of the game.Oh, yeah....the Falcons were 11-5-1 and beat the Packers with him in Labeau two years ago in the playoffs and they are 3-0 with him this year. But, they were real successful with him out.....5-11. 46534[/snapback] Did you watch that Packers game? Vick didn't do squat. Falcons defense won it singlehandily with about 6 turnovers.... And their defense went from one of the best to one of the worst last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gantrules Posted September 27, 2004 Share Posted September 27, 2004 agreed Buff. My arguement was simply that no matter what all the people say about Vick being an "average" QB his record as a starter is 17-7-1. That's a 75% success rate. That on an average season translates to a 12-4 record. I don't know what people discredit the guy..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts