taterhill Posted December 18, 2005 Share Posted December 18, 2005 he is terrible, and provides ZERO for this offense..would it really be that bad to have Willis in on 3rd down, and passing stuations?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsObserver Posted December 18, 2005 Share Posted December 18, 2005 he is terrible, and provides ZERO for this offense..would it really be that bad to have Willis in on 3rd down, and passing stuations?? 536154[/snapback] lionel gates, please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sweet baboo Posted December 18, 2005 Share Posted December 18, 2005 cuz he's quick like a cat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted December 18, 2005 Share Posted December 18, 2005 lionel gates, please. 536157[/snapback] Was he even active last night? MM said we would see him in these final weeks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MartyBall4Buffalo Posted December 18, 2005 Share Posted December 18, 2005 he is terrible, and provides ZERO for this offense..would it really be that bad to have Willis in on 3rd down, and passing stuations?? 536154[/snapback] cause he can block or so I'm told. Shaud Williams is a decent change of pace back, but using this as a reason he's on the field on 3rd down doesn't quite cut it. At some point you gotta say.... "Ok we've done all we can to protect the qb, lets put our best players on the field and go out and try to make a play with them" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taterhill Posted December 18, 2005 Author Share Posted December 18, 2005 anyone but shaud...line moorman up in the backfield Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hook88 Posted December 19, 2005 Share Posted December 19, 2005 he is terrible, and provides ZERO for this offense..would it really be that bad to have Willis in on 3rd down, and passing stuations?? 536154[/snapback] What game were you watching? 8 yds per carry seems O.K. to me. especially when you have holes that Pee Wee Herman couldn't squeeze through. Look at some of the holes the Cowboy line opens up. I'm sure Shaud would love to run through those. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schulman16 Posted December 19, 2005 Share Posted December 19, 2005 What game were you watching? 8 yds per carry seems O.K. to me. especially when you have holes that Pee Wee Herman couldn't squeeze through. Look at some of the holes the Cowboy line opens up. I'm sure Shaud would love to run through those. 536345[/snapback] Yeah, seriously. Back in the beginning of the season and the end of last season when the running game was going well everyone was loving shaud. Now that the line has worn down even more, if Willis cant do anything, you sure cant expect Shaud to get anything going either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDH Posted December 19, 2005 Share Posted December 19, 2005 What game were you watching? 8 yds per carry seems O.K. to me. especially when you have holes that Pee Wee Herman couldn't squeeze through. Look at some of the holes the Cowboy line opens up. I'm sure Shaud would love to run through those. 536345[/snapback] Averaging 8 yards a carry doesn't mean much when the majority of your yards come on draw plays on 3rd and forever and the D has dropped 8-9 back in coverage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EC-Bills Posted December 19, 2005 Share Posted December 19, 2005 cuz he's quick like a cat 536159[/snapback] That's why they nicknamed him "Whiskers" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taterhill Posted December 19, 2005 Author Share Posted December 19, 2005 Yeah, seriously. Back in the beginning of the season and the end of last season when the running game was going well everyone was loving shaud. Now that the line has worn down even more, if Willis cant do anything, you sure cant expect Shaud to get anything going either. 536350[/snapback] I never loved Shaud Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stussy109 Posted December 19, 2005 Share Posted December 19, 2005 he is terrible, and provides ZERO for this offense..would it really be that bad to have Willis in on 3rd down, and passing stuations?? 536154[/snapback] He had as many yards in one rush as willis had for the whole night... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boomerjamhead Posted December 19, 2005 Share Posted December 19, 2005 There's a lot to be said about third down backs. My favorite of all time was Todd McNair when he played for Kansas City. Third and long? No biggie... Fourth and long? No biggie. The dude just made it happen time and time again while Okoye and Word were sitting on the bench watching. Damn that was a fun offense to watch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nick in* england Posted December 19, 2005 Share Posted December 19, 2005 lionel gates, please. 536157[/snapback] Will not get on the field because he won't run between the tackles apparantly... Until he runs hard between the tackles he will not play. And he won't get another shot to prove himself until the offseason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark VI Posted December 19, 2005 Share Posted December 19, 2005 Shaud is part of several offensive " Packages ". Need I say more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bear Posted December 19, 2005 Share Posted December 19, 2005 he is terrible, and provides ZERO for this offense 536154[/snapback] I don't get it. You could say the same thing about Willis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCBoston Posted December 19, 2005 Share Posted December 19, 2005 The more important question is, why do you take your best player off the field on the most important plays? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ch19079 Posted December 19, 2005 Share Posted December 19, 2005 lionel gates, please. 536157[/snapback] I agree. Williams is a 3rd down back, not a every down back. so if mcgahee gets tired on a 1st and 10 running play, it makes no sense to put in our small 3rd down back on 2nd and 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockpile Posted December 19, 2005 Share Posted December 19, 2005 My favorite 3rd down back was Robb Riddick. Maybe Shaud is out there because Willis has a habit of running out of bounds on 3rd down. There's a lot to be said about third down backs. My favorite of all time was Todd McNair when he played for Kansas City. Third and long? No biggie... Fourth and long? No biggie. The dude just made it happen time and time again while Okoye and Word were sitting on the bench watching. Damn that was a fun offense to watch. 536517[/snapback] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
30dive Posted December 19, 2005 Share Posted December 19, 2005 I would like to find the stats, but I am more than confident that Williams had more snaps that McGahee. Watching the game Saturday night I came to the conclusion that Shaud has compromising pictures of Mularkey. It can be the answer as to why this guy is on the field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts