CoachChuckDickerson Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 http://www.stadiumwall.com/index.php?showtopic=29608&hl= an excellent read, with stats... 433197[/snapback] Here are some stats to ponder (i'm sorry to let facts get in the way of a good "JP sucks, start KH rant") He's only started 13 career games, and in the only extended action he saw, over 8 games, here were his numbers... 2003, 8 games started, 10 total 193-302 63%, 1797 yards, 10 TD 12 int's this doesnt exactly instill a lot of confidence in me. 2002, 4 games 2 good, a combined 44-69, 524 yds, 5 TD's 0 int's (a 49-30 loss to KC, and a 20-7 win vs Cincy) 2 so-so games, combined 20-37, 266 yds, 3 TD's 4 INT's (a 26-21 loss to balt, and a 24-16 win over atl) 2004, 2 games 1 good game 30-39, 413 yds, 5 TD's, 2 INT's (58-48 loss to cincy) 1 so-so, 20-29, 228 yds1 TD, 2 INT's (22-14 win vs houston) The guy wasn't exactly playing with the Rams or Colts. He was playing with Cleveland. When was the last time you saw an offensive skill position probowler roll out of that town. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Do you honestly think Holcomb came here for less money and gave up a starting job in Cleveland to hold a clipboard? Don't kid yourself. If JP falters, Holcomb will start. The Bills are not going to flush another season like they did last year. 433102[/snapback] Holcomb was not the starter in Cleveland. He was holding the clipboard after losing the starting job to the first overall pick in the 2003 draft (Carson Palmer) because first overall picks don't sit on the bench unless they're selected by San Francisco. But thanks for playing, Coach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Holcomb was not the starter in Cleveland. He was holding the clipboard after losing the starting job to the first overall pick in the 2003 draft (Carson Palmer) because first overall picks don't sit on the bench unless they're selected by San Francisco. But thanks for playing, Coach. 433238[/snapback] Holcomb was a Bengal? Palmer was a Brown? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JinVA Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Holcomb was not the starter in Cleveland. He was holding the clipboard after losing the starting job to the first overall pick in the 2003 draft (Carson Palmer) because first overall picks don't sit on the bench unless they're selected by San Francisco. But thanks for playing, Coach. 433238[/snapback] Very uncharacteristic of you LA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Very uncharacteristic of you LA 433259[/snapback] First coffee. I even stared at his stat to ensure Palmer was a first rounder, and never even looked at his !@#$ing uniform. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smokinandjokin Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Replying to Kelly Holcomb should start? YYYYAAAAAAWWWWWWNNNNNN YAWN YAWN This horse was beaten dead two months ago. Get behind your quarterback. Holcomb might not see the field this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inkman Posted September 8, 2005 Author Share Posted September 8, 2005 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoachChuckDickerson Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Holcomb was not the starter in Cleveland. He was holding the clipboard after losing the starting job to the first overall pick in the 2003 draft (Carson Palmer) because first overall picks don't sit on the bench unless they're selected by San Francisco. But thanks for playing, Coach. 433238[/snapback] Um yeah....I'm just gonna let this one slide. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockpile Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 I have not heard that from any Bills fan I have spoken with in person. I can think of no advantage of starting Holcomb, and little advantage in pulling JP if he falters early on. Either way, you are telling the world, we !@#$ up again in selecting a QB. Back to the draft line. The future is NOW. If JP is not the future, why bother playing him at all? Everywhere I turn I keep hearing how Holcomb should start if JP falters early on. Some people even want him to start outright over JP. Does anyone here feel that way? 433004[/snapback] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TigerJ Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 My guess is that at this moment Holcomb's experience makes him the better QB. However, Losman's athleticism and arm strength give him far more upside. He's starting because by playing he can develop into that upside more quickly. I support that decision on the part of the Bills. If you was to see someone who right out supports starting Holcomb, you can check out the Range and look up posts by Shiva2999. Then again, he wanted the Bills to start Travis Brown when he was a Bill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smokinandjokin Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 He's starting because by playing he can develop into that upside more quickly. I support that decision on the part of the Bills. 433608[/snapback] Thanks, I'll let them know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts