DabillsDaBillsDaBills Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 5 minutes ago, dhg said: But they could have made it 28-21. One score game. Instead, by going for 2 and missing it became a two score game It was still a 1 score game at 28-20. Obviously that's dependent on them converting the next 2 pointer though. I think the math is fairly simple in this scenario. If you're down by 14 in the 4th Q you should always go for 2. If you have a 40% chance of converting (somewhat less than league average) the odds look like this: 40% chance of converting the first 2 pt conversion leading to a large advantage (win on the next TD+PAT) 36% chance of failing both 2 point conversions leading to a large disadvantage (2 point deficit) 24% chance failing the 1st 2 point conversion and succeeding on the 2nd leading to a tie Quote
dhg Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 22 minutes ago, DabillsDaBillsDaBills said: It was still a 1 score game at 28-20. Obviously that's dependent on them converting the next 2 pointer though. I think the math is fairly simple in this scenario. If you're down by 14 in the 4th Q you should always go for 2. If you have a 40% chance of converting (somewhat less than league average) the odds look like this: 40% chance of converting the first 2 pt conversion leading to a large advantage (win on the next TD+PAT) 36% chance of failing both 2 point conversions leading to a large disadvantage (2 point deficit) 24% chance failing the 1st 2 point conversion and succeeding on the 2nd leading to a tie I understand that. But if you kick the 1 you don't worry about having to go for 2 pt conversion. Take it to OT worst case Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.