There’s something different about McD this season…

[Avisan]

4 minutes ago, GoBills808 said:

he took Jimmy Garoppolo to a Super Bowl in 2019 lol

Garoppolo played really well that year, fam.  He was productive, threw too many picks but was excellent outside of that.  Tannehill also had an incredible season that year.

 

We don't asterisk the Nick Foles Superbowl win because he isn't a great QB overall, dude was playing out of his mind for a bit.  That's sports.

[GoBills808]

4 minutes ago, Avisan said:

Garoppolo played really well that year, fam.  He was productive, threw too many picks but was excellent outside of that.  Tannehill also had an incredible season that year.

 

We don't asterisk the Nick Foles Superbowl win because he isn't a great QB overall, dude was playing out of his mind for a bit.  That's sports.

😂😂😂Ok you looked at the stats

 

He was bad. That yr and every yr of his career

 

Because he is a bad QB

[Avisan]

7 minutes ago, GoBills808 said:

😂😂😂Ok you looked at the stats

 

He was bad. That yr and every yr of his career

 

Because he is a bad QB

Whether or not a player is a "bad QB" in the eyes of GoBills808 has little bearing on their quality of play in a given window of time

 

Nick Foles is a "bad QB" but he was amazing when it counted

[FireChans]

29 minutes ago, Avisan said:

Garoppolo played really well that year, fam.  He was productive, threw too many picks but was excellent outside of that.  Tannehill also had an incredible season that year.

 

We don't asterisk the Nick Foles Superbowl win because he isn't a great QB overall, dude was playing out of his mind for a bit.  That's sports.

The difference is that Shanny is the reason Jimmy G and Brock Purdy and to a lesser extent CJ Beathard and Nick Mulldog were productive. 
 

Mac Jones too. The system makes the QB in SF.

Edited 22 minutes ago by FireChans

[Avisan]

3 minutes ago, FireChans said:

The difference is that Shanny is the reason Jimmy G and Brock Purdy and to a lesser extent CJ Beathard and Nick Mulldog were productive. 
 

Mac Jones too. The system makes the QB in SF.

"That's like his whole thing, having a QB-friendly system that gets really good passing efficiency when he has a player under center that can run it."

 

From my initial post on the previous page.

 

He thrives with players that place the ball accurately and on schedule with good pre-snap awareness, Tua would probably look pretty darn good with Shanahan given his relative success with McDaniel.

[FireChans]

Just now, Avisan said:

"That's like his whole thing, having a QB-friendly system that gets really good passing efficiency when he has a player under center that can run it."

 

From my initial post on the previous page.

 

He thrives with players that place the ball accurately and on schedule with good pre-snap awareness, Tua would probably look pretty darn good with Shanahan given his relative success with McDaniel.

That doesn’t make them good QBs though. That’s the point.

[Avisan]

1 minute ago, FireChans said:

That doesn’t make them good QBs though. That’s the point.

Whether or not they're subjective "good QBs" doesn't change their objective offensive output in a given window of time.  That's the point.

 

Garoppolo is "bad" because he's injury prone and easily baited into INTs, but he was extremely efficient in spot duty for NE and early on in SF before injuries etc. and defenses adjusting to tendencies.

 

Shanahan getting good QB play out of QBs that can run his system doesn't mean he's winning without good QB play.