BigDingus Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago They should've gone a step further & required a uniform surface for ALL fields. This quote also annoyed me: "The league's chief medical officer, Dr. Allen Sills, said there are no "statistically significant differences" in lower extremity injuries or concussions that can be attributed to the type of playing surface or a specific surface, despite widespread preferences by players for grass fields and complaints about surfaces such as the one at MetLife Stadium, where the New York Giants and Jets play." Reminds me of your average workers, all experiencing the same issue on a daily basis, who then repeatedly notify upper management of that issue. Then management comes back & tells the people who know better, "We reviewed your claims & have found nothing wrong. Thanks for your valuable feedback while we do nothing to address your problems!" Quote
Beck Water Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 4 hours ago, GunnerBill said: Tottenham, I believe, already meets the NFL's higher standard which is ludicrous given its injury record. Wembley doesn't. But has a much better injury record. So call me sceptical. I thought the problem with Tottenham was that the NFL doesn't get to play on the normal surface. They take it out and replace it with astroturf rolled over concrete. Just what I heard. Quote
GunnerBill Posted 26 minutes ago Posted 26 minutes ago 41 minutes ago, Beck Water said: I thought the problem with Tottenham was that the NFL doesn't get to play on the normal surface. They take it out and replace it with astroturf rolled over concrete. Just what I heard. Yea that's right. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.