AlBUNDY4TDS Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Just now, nedboy7 said: Trump is President. Biden is an old folks home. I think that’s why people are concerned with Trumps idiotic behavior compared to Biden. Where was this when Biden was president? Oh yeah, sharp as a tack. Save it ned.
ALLinALLEN Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 13 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Sure doesn't stop you from ranting about Trump. Like I said tds. You claim to criticize Biden everywhere but this message board. Suuree. Biden was a horrible leader in the last years of his second term, including an insane attempt to want to run again. It's a shame and a huge blunder on behalf of the dems to even allow him to run again. I watched the first debate he did and literally laughed and said this man cannot run again. I cannot believe it took that embarrassing display to get them to change candidates, and to one that wasn't even nominated. It's a huge blunder, and that's just one of the many Biden blunders I have issue with. Happy? Disagreeing with the echo chamber folks in here is not "ranting" especially when you all would be louder than ever in here if any Dem president tried to pull the stuff Trump is in his first 9 months. 1
nedboy7 Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 14 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Where was this when Biden was president? Oh yeah, sharp as a tack. Save it ned. I think the above response says it perfectly.
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Just now, nedboy7 said: I think the above response says it perfectly. And then he was ousted by his own party for having oatmeal for brains. Your point is? 3 minutes ago, ALLinALLEN said: Biden was a horrible leader in the last years of his second term, including an insane attempt to want to run again. It's a shame and a huge blunder on behalf of the dems to even allow him to run again. I watched the first debate he did and literally laughed and said this man cannot run again. I cannot believe it took that embarrassing display to get them to change candidates, and to one that wasn't even nominated. It's a huge blunder, and that's just one of the many Biden blunders I have issue with. Happy? Disagreeing with the echo chamber folks in here is not "ranting" especially when you all would be louder than ever in here if any Dem president tried to pull the stuff Trump is in his first 9 months. All you had to do was put it in writing! Trump's a blowhard who loves to hear himself talk and sometimes looses the plot while trying to "own the libs" See this isn't so hard.
nedboy7 Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 2 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: And then he was ousted by his own party for having oatmeal for brains. Your point is? All you had to do was put it in writing! Trump's a blowhard who loves to hear himself talk and sometimes looses the plot while trying to "own the libs" See this isn't so hard. Much more to it than that absurd simplification. Take a break. You are making a fool of yourself.
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Just now, nedboy7 said: Much more to it than that absurd simplification. Take a break. You are making a fool of yourself. Just trying to dumb it down so you can follow along!
ALLinALLEN Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 3 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: All you had to do was put it in writing! Trump's a blowhard who loves to hear himself talk and sometimes looses the plot while trying to "own the libs" See this isn't so hard. Why is it so hard then to condemn the Ingrassia guy then for his texts? Why can't we just all agree that is not acceptable behavior? There are many folks in here acting like it's not a big deal. Here's another example - I have the option to vote for Jay Jones next month....He's a Dem, I'm a Dem, I should vote for him right? Then the news comes out where he sent texts wishing for someones kids to be killed....totally not normal, and therefore I can't support him. It's really not that hard.
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 1 minute ago, ALLinALLEN said: Why is it so hard then to condemn the Ingrassia guy then for his texts? Why can't we just all agree that is not acceptable behavior? There are many folks in here acting like it's not a big deal. Here's another example - I have the option to vote for Jay Jones next month....He's a Dem, I'm a Dem, I should vote for him right? Then the news comes out where he sent texts wishing for someones kids to be killed....totally not normal, and therefore I can't support him. It's really not that hard. Thow that ingrassa guy into a pit. We good?
JDHillFan Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago (edited) 24 minutes ago, ALLinALLEN said: Biden was a horrible leader in the last years of his second term, including an insane attempt to want to run again. It's a shame and a huge blunder on behalf of the dems to even allow him to run again. I watched the first debate he did and literally laughed and said this man cannot run again. I cannot believe it took that embarrassing display to get them to change candidates, and to one that wasn't even nominated. It's a huge blunder, and that's just one of the many Biden blunders I have issue with. Happy? Disagreeing with the echo chamber folks in here is not "ranting" especially when you all would be louder than ever in here if any Dem president tried to pull the stuff Trump is in his first 9 months. Second term, huh? I love that you got an awesome emoji for this from Nedboi. Apparently neither one of you know that Biden only served one term. Too funny. 7 minutes ago, ALLinALLEN said: totally not normal, and therefore I can't support him. It's really not that hard. You get points here for being normal. The problem is that it seems to be very hard for Democrat politicians. You know, the people that hold more sway than AllinAllen. Can you show me any that have called for this guy to step down? Most of the lefties here are even unwilling to do so. Edited 4 hours ago by JDHillFan
Orlando Buffalo Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 1 hour ago, ALLinALLEN said: You picked the one reply in that thread I didnt condemn it, which is hilarious and such on brand for you. Such a stupid argument you start too..."You didnt condemn Kirk in a bills politics thread, so now you cant say anything about this totally different topic"... its third grade level reasoning. But since you wanted clarification on my Kirk comment about being divisive, here is a great link that you will probably refute or deflect because it isnt Fox. so which one of his comments do you find so objectionable in the context it was presented? I have seen that list from the guardian and would state in context all of the ones I have researched make sense. So I will ask you to pick one or two and I will see if I agree with you. As for cherry picking the quote it was the first one that popped up and lastly I am not the one who started this argument by being pedantic, you did when you posted "You know, it's very easy to condemn someone who says "I have a little Nazi in me", or "Never trust a chinaman or indian". You don't need to play apples to apples on everything, you can easily say "yeah you know, that's pretty bad and f'd up to say and believe". It's also a Trump nominee for a special council position. It's pretty easy to simply say that this is a bad person and a bad pick. But you could never."
ALLinALLEN Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 7 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: Second term, huh? I love that you got an awesome emoji for this from Nedboi. Apparently neither one of you know that Biden only served one term. Too funny. You get points here for being normal. The problem is that it seems to be very hard for Democrat politicians. You know, the people that hold more sway than AllinAllen. Can you show me any that have called for this guy to step down? Most of the lefties here are even unwilling to do so. I misspoke, yes I'm aware of it being one term (although it felt like 10 years). The Jay Jones guy? Yeah it's sad that the dem party hasnt told him to step down. Insane thing to say and double down on for him. It's hard for elected officials on both sides to speak out against their party members, even though it shouldnt be. The boat rocks to each side whenever a situation occurs. It's not one-sided, although sometimes it seems it is. I know that will ruffle feathers here but they both typically take their sides and dont waver. 40 minutes ago, Orlando Buffalo said: so which one of his comments do you find so objectionable in the context it was presented? I have seen that list from the guardian and would state in context all of the ones I have researched make sense. So I will ask you to pick one or two and I will see if I agree with you. As for cherry picking the quote it was the first one that popped up and lastly I am not the one who started this argument by being pedantic, you did when you posted "You know, it's very easy to condemn someone who says "I have a little Nazi in me", or "Never trust a chinaman or indian". You don't need to play apples to apples on everything, you can easily say "yeah you know, that's pretty bad and f'd up to say and believe". It's also a Trump nominee for a special council position. It's pretty easy to simply say that this is a bad person and a bad pick. But you could never." Can you clarify what you mean by "All of the ones I have researched make sense"? Happy to talk about how divisive a lot of those comments can be. You said I didnt condemn the CK thing, which I did many times. I asked for you to go find it, and you pulled THAT quote, which was one of the only ones where I didnt. That is bothersome to me.
Orlando Buffalo Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 36 minutes ago, ALLinALLEN said: . Can you clarify what you mean by "All of the ones I have researched make sense"? Happy to talk about how divisive a lot of those comments can be. You said I didnt condemn the CK thing, which I did many times. I asked for you to go find it, and you pulled THAT quote, which was one of the only ones where I didnt. That is bothersome to me. I am done with you, you are truly either too stupid for this or are just trolling at this point, I honestly have no idea which. You keep saying you did something but offer no proof, I have shown you proof of what you said and you have now 5 separate times not explained it beyond sending the first thing that pops on Google. i will point this out to you, that the majority of what CK is quoted as saying there is completely out of context but you would have to actually want to know the truth.
ALLinALLEN Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 15 minutes ago, Orlando Buffalo said: I am done with you, you are truly either too stupid for this or are just trolling at this point, I honestly have no idea which. You keep saying you did something but offer no proof, I have shown you proof of what you said and you have now 5 separate times not explained it beyond sending the first thing that pops on Google. i will point this out to you, that the majority of what CK is quoted as saying there is completely out of context but you would have to actually want to know the truth. What? I think you're the dumb one here no offense. I asked for clarification to you saying "All of the ones I have researched make sense" to the CK article I posted, and that was too much for you? I'm just asking what you mean by that. What "Makes sense" to you? You keep saying I need to show proof of what I said, when I have told you multiple times I condemned the CK stuff in that thread - but you cherry picked the ONE reply where I didnt. You can go find the multiple times I did. Do you want me to show where I did 5 separate times? Will that make you happy? I didn't know I had to prove I said something when you're the one saying I didnt. That's on you to go find, but I assure you it's there. The article I sent contains a plethora of quotes that are divisive, which prompted my response in that CK thread that you find so troublesome. Happy to talk through that but I'd love the clarity on the "researched and makes sense" part first. 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 3 hours ago, Orlando Buffalo said: "You know, it's very easy to condemn someone who says "I have a little Nazi in me", or "Never trust a chinaman or indian" yes. easy and correct.
JDHillFan Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 2 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: yes. easy and correct. You use the slur Uncle Tom as though you are entitled to do so. Go away.
Joe Ferguson forever Posted 40 minutes ago Posted 40 minutes ago (edited) 52 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: Go away. I'm laid up a few weeks and will be posting here to lessen the boredom. F off. uncle tom's are among us. Clarance Thomas says hi. 1 disparaging : a Black person who is overeager to win the approval of whites (as by obsequious behavior or uncritical acceptance of white values and goals) 2 disparaging : a person who is overly subservient to or cooperative with authority the worst floor managers and supervisors by far are women … Edited 26 minutes ago by Joe Ferguson forever
JDHillFan Posted 18 minutes ago Posted 18 minutes ago 17 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: I'm laid up a few weeks and will be posting here to lessen the boredom. F off. uncle tom's are among us. Clarance Thomas says hi. 1 disparaging : a Black person who is overeager to win the approval of whites (as by obsequious behavior or uncritical acceptance of white values and goals) 2 disparaging : a person who is overly subservient to or cooperative with authority the worst floor managers and supervisors by far are women … You don’t have to justify your use of a racial slur to me. I think you should use it often. You are a big NPR guy. Enjoy. https://www.npr.org/2011/03/23/134789474/the-root-the-troubling-nuances-of-uncle-tom But calling someone an Uncle Tom is a different category of insult. It's a serious slur, probably even more offensive than the n-word. Even white people know that. They should have said MOST white people…
Recommended Posts