B-Man Posted August 26 Author Posted August 26 The Police know. D.C. Attorney General Tries to Come for Trump Over Ending Cashless Bail and It Doesn't Go Well By Katie Jerkovich https://redstate.com/katie-jerkovich/2025/08/25/dc-police-union-ends-attorney-general-after-he-tried-to-come-for-trump-over-ending-cashless-bail-n2193221 1
ChiGoose Posted August 26 Posted August 26 "It really is about fighting crime" says the person supporting the actions that are so divorced from fighting crime that they received THREE NO BILLS from grand juries on the same case. They failed to secure a grand jury indictment THREE TIMES! That's unheard of. It's almost as if they are grossly overcharging people for things because the goal is intimidation, not fighting crime... Prosecutors Fail 3 Times to Charge Woman With Felony Assault of F.B.I. Agent in D.C. "Prosecutors almost never go in front of grand juries without obtaining indictments because they are in control of the information grand jurors hear and defendants are not allowed to have their lawyers in the room as evidence is presented." "But in a brief submission filed to Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey in Federal District Court in Washington, the prosecutors in Ms. Reid’s case acknowledged the extraordinary: that they had failed three times to secure an indictment within the 30 days given to them to do so after Ms. Reid’s arrest." “Three grand juries have now declined to indict Ms. Reid for felony assault on a law enforcement officer,” her lawyers, Tezira Abe and Eugene Ohm, said in a statement on Monday evening. “The U.S. attorney can try to concoct crimes to quiet the people, but in our criminal justice system, the citizens have the last word. We are anxious to present the misdemeanor case to a jury and to quickly clear Ms. Reid’s name.”
Wolfgang Posted August 26 Posted August 26 7 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: "It really is about fighting crime" says the person supporting the actions that are so divorced from fighting crime that they received THREE NO BILLS from grand juries on the same case. They failed to secure a grand jury indictment THREE TIMES! That's unheard of. It's almost as if they are grossly overcharging people for things because the goal is intimidation, not fighting crime... Prosecutors Fail 3 Times to Charge Woman With Felony Assault of F.B.I. Agent in D.C. "Prosecutors almost never go in front of grand juries without obtaining indictments because they are in control of the information grand jurors hear and defendants are not allowed to have their lawyers in the room as evidence is presented." "But in a brief submission filed to Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey in Federal District Court in Washington, the prosecutors in Ms. Reid’s case acknowledged the extraordinary: that they had failed three times to secure an indictment within the 30 days given to them to do so after Ms. Reid’s arrest." “Three grand juries have now declined to indict Ms. Reid for felony assault on a law enforcement officer,” her lawyers, Tezira Abe and Eugene Ohm, said in a statement on Monday evening. “The U.S. attorney can try to concoct crimes to quiet the people, but in our criminal justice system, the citizens have the last word. We are anxious to present the misdemeanor case to a jury and to quickly clear Ms. Reid’s name.” That is the safest story I've heard all day... Oh well...
B-Man Posted August 26 Author Posted August 26 FTA: We should also note that many of the measures the Trump administration has taken are, by necessity, temporary. The National Guard troops and the surge of federal law enforcement can't be sustained indefinitely. It's also very likely that, despite the arrests already made, a certain number of the goblins that infest the District are smart enough to lie low, to keep a low profile until, they are likely presuming, things go back to normal. The increased law enforcement and the National Guard troops are effective at reducing street-level crime. Showing the flag like this generally is. But the root causes have to be examined, rooted out, pinned down, and addressed as well. In determining those root causes, one should take a close, hard look at the justice system within the District, from prosecutors to judges. Revolving-door justice systems are all too common in Democratic jurisdictions, and the District's revolving door is notorious. Then, and only then, will the nation's capital city's crime problem be fixed. https://redstate.com/wardclark/2025/08/26/new-the-no-homicide-dc-streak-ends-n2193250 The D.C. Homicide-Free Streak Ends Quote A man was killed in Washington, D.C., early Tuesday, marking the first apparent homicide reported in the city in 12 days. Officers responded to reports of a shooting at approximately 12:25 a.m. on Tuesday in Southeast Washington, the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) said in a statement. The officers found a man “unconscious and breathing, suffering from a gunshot wound.” The man was transported to a local hospital, “where after all lifesaving measures failed, he was pronounced dead,” MPD said. https://redstate.com/wardclark/2025/08/26/new-the-no-homicide-dc-streak-ends-n2193250
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted August 26 Posted August 26 5 hours ago, ChiGoose said: "It really is about fighting crime" says the person supporting the actions that are so divorced from fighting crime that they received THREE NO BILLS from grand juries on the same case. They failed to secure a grand jury indictment THREE TIMES! That's unheard of. It's almost as if they are grossly overcharging people for things because the goal is intimidation, not fighting crime... Prosecutors Fail 3 Times to Charge Woman With Felony Assault of F.B.I. Agent in D.C. "Prosecutors almost never go in front of grand juries without obtaining indictments because they are in control of the information grand jurors hear and defendants are not allowed to have their lawyers in the room as evidence is presented." "But in a brief submission filed to Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey in Federal District Court in Washington, the prosecutors in Ms. Reid’s case acknowledged the extraordinary: that they had failed three times to secure an indictment within the 30 days given to them to do so after Ms. Reid’s arrest." “Three grand juries have now declined to indict Ms. Reid for felony assault on a law enforcement officer,” her lawyers, Tezira Abe and Eugene Ohm, said in a statement on Monday evening. “The U.S. attorney can try to concoct crimes to quiet the people, but in our criminal justice system, the citizens have the last word. We are anxious to present the misdemeanor case to a jury and to quickly clear Ms. Reid’s name.” So the case didn't meet the felony threshold. You're defending criminals again. 1
ChiGoose Posted August 26 Posted August 26 (edited) 42 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: So the case didn't meet the felony threshold. You're defending criminals again. You must be one of those big government types who believes everything the government says, so I guess I can see why you think he’s a criminal. For those who believe in the rule of law and constitution, it’s important for the accused to have rights. The fact that if what the government was saying was true, they could have avoided all of this mess by going through the usual process should make anyone with any amount of skepticism concerned that the government is lying. Edited August 26 by ChiGoose
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted August 26 Posted August 26 Just now, ChiGoose said: You must be one of those big government types who believes everything the government says, then I guess I can see why you think he’s a criminal. For those who believe in the rule of law and constitution, it’s important for the accused to have rights. The fact that if what the government was saying was true, they could have avoided all of this mess by going through the usual process should make anyone with any amount of skepticism concerned that the government is lying. The guy here in the country illegally a criminal? What a bold take.
JDHillFan Posted August 26 Posted August 26 3 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: For those who believe in the rule of law and constitution, Do you consider yourself one of these people?
ChiGoose Posted August 26 Posted August 26 35 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: The guy here in the country illegally a criminal? What a bold take. Being undocumented in the US is not a criminal offense 2
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted August 27 Posted August 27 1 hour ago, ChiGoose said: Being undocumented in the US is not a criminal offense What color is the sky in dreamland? 1 hour ago, ChiGoose said: Being undocumented in the US is not a criminal offense Undocumented =illegal alien 1
Homelander Posted August 27 Posted August 27 ⬆️ Look at this incel whining about documents while Trump pardoned over 1,500 Capitol rioters. Not as flashy as letting 5,000 terrorists walk in Afghanistan, but same playbook, different country.
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted August 27 Posted August 27 3 minutes ago, Homelander said: ⬆️ Look at this incel whining about documents while Trump pardoned over 1,500 Capitol rioters. Not as flashy as letting 5,000 terrorists walk in Afghanistan, but same playbook, different country. Ohh incel? That's so brat. Talk about playbook. Msnpc. 1
ChiGoose Posted August 27 Posted August 27 23 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Undocumented =illegal alien Doesn’t matter what you call it, it’s not actually a crime. If you have thought it was, this might be a good moment for some introspection 1
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted August 27 Posted August 27 2 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: Doesn’t matter what you call it, it’s not actually a crime. If you have thought it was, this might be a good moment for some introspection It is if you cross the border illegally. 1 1
B-Man Posted August 27 Author Posted August 27 1 minute ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: It is if you cross the border illegally. He cannot admit to this truth, is whole dishonest house of cards comes down otherwise 6 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: this might be a good moment for some introspection 1
ChiGoose Posted August 27 Posted August 27 15 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: It is if you cross the border illegally. Crossing the border illegally is a crime. Being undocumented is not a crime. About half of the undocumented people in the US crossed the border legally. 16 minutes ago, B-Man said: He cannot admit to this truth, is whole dishonest house of cards comes down otherwise Facts are tough for you, huh?
B-Man Posted August 27 Author Posted August 27 25 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: Facts are tough for you, huh? Nope. Admitting you are wrong is tough for you we know. Meanwhile back to the thread topic. 1
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted August 27 Posted August 27 8 hours ago, ChiGoose said: Crossing the border illegally is a crime. Being undocumented is not a crime. About half of the undocumented people in the US crossed the border legally. Facts are tough for you, huh? Ok so it becomes a civil case in which you still can be deported. What's your point? Uganda man still is accused of other crimes including being a gang member and human trafficking.
JDHillFan Posted August 27 Posted August 27 Those that disagree: old white people chigoose roundy that’s the whole list 1
Recommended Posts