Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

As we all know, the backlash against DEI has never truly been about competence - it's always been about race. Nominees like this make that fact unmistakably clear

 

 

Posted
Just now, Homelander said:

As we all know, the backlash against DEI has never truly been about competence - it's always been about race. Nominees like this make that fact unmistakably clear

 

 

Weird how people lie about easily verifiable information.

Hey, but I guess it worked for years, right up through his nomination. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

Weird how people lie about easily verifiable information.

 

Agree on this. It’s why Redhawk needs to be continually punished  IMG_5413.jpeg.f9be8f6945d406fce007dd2b86ab6151.jpeg

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, JDHillFan said:

Agree on this. It’s why Redhawk needs to be continually punished  IMG_5413.jpeg.f9be8f6945d406fce007dd2b86ab6151.jpeg

I will call for an investigation just as soon as he's nominated for a high-level position.

 

Back to this guy: it was kind of easy to make up/embellish crap in the pre-internet/no real privacy days. 1990s: Guy says he's qualified as a commercial pilot? OK, fine. He's a pilot, so what, I'm gonna dig through some paper records in the Government Documents floor of the library to see if his name shows up, or I'm going to send some kind of request to the FAA and wait for a response. So why not? And this particular lie appears to be one that dates from those days.

 

So you make up a fake credential, you can't just drop it suddenly ... it follows you. I don't think this disqualifies him in any way. I also imagine that any commercial pilots who worked for him knew damn well that this was a lie. Whatever.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

I will call for an investigation just as soon as he's nominated for a high-level position.

 

Back to this guy: it was kind of easy to make up/embellish crap in the pre-internet/no real privacy days. 1990s: Guy says he's qualified as a commercial pilot? OK, fine. He's a pilot, so what, I'm gonna dig through some paper records in the Government Documents floor of the library to see if his name shows up, or I'm going to send some kind of request to the FAA and wait for a response. So why not? And this particular lie appears to be one that dates from those days.

 

So you make up a fake credential, you can't just drop it suddenly ... it follows you. I don't think this disqualifies him in any way. I also imagine that any commercial pilots who worked for him knew damn well that this was a lie. Whatever.

It does follow. Why dipsh*ts like Walz and Blumenthal would embellish their service records is anyone’s guess. Seems like most of them tend to land on their feet.

Posted
Just now, JDHillFan said:

It does follow. Why dipsh*ts like Walz and Blumenthal would embellish their service records is anyone’s guess. Seems like most of them tend to land on their feet.

Because embellishment becomes a habit that's hard to break.

Particularly for politicians: you say it once, it's on the record, it's awfully hard to back down with the old "I misspoke." It's also hard to tell what worked and what didn't work in getting you elected in the first place.

If we disqualify everyone who b.s.'d their credentials there wouldn't be anyone left.

  • Agree 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

Because embellishment becomes a habit that's hard to break.

Particularly for politicians: you say it once, it's on the record, it's awfully hard to back down with the old "I misspoke." It's also hard to tell what worked and what didn't work in getting you elected in the first place.

If we disqualify everyone who b.s.'d their credentials there wouldn't be anyone left.

yup.  We even see it here, on this forum.

Posted
Just now, Joe Ferguson forever said:

yup.  We even see it here, on this forum.

Yes

 

IMG_5413.jpeg.ff54c3af8b6ee05b6c04ec80dd0888c2.jpeg

 

Will you please try to be at least marginally self-aware?

Posted
17 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

This girl actually BROUGHT THE FAKE TIME MAG COVER to her interview. And still got hired.

when they show you who they are, believe them.  I don't have TDS.  I have RMD; rational maga disgust.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, The Frankish Reich said:

I will call for an investigation just as soon as he's nominated for a high-level position.

 

Back to this guy: it was kind of easy to make up/embellish crap in the pre-internet/no real privacy days. 1990s: Guy says he's qualified as a commercial pilot? OK, fine. He's a pilot, so what, I'm gonna dig through some paper records in the Government Documents floor of the library to see if his name shows up, or I'm going to send some kind of request to the FAA and wait for a response. So why not? And this particular lie appears to be one that dates from those days.

 

So you make up a fake credential, you can't just drop it suddenly ... it follows you. I don't think this disqualifies him in any way. I also imagine that any commercial pilots who worked for him knew damn well that this was a lie. Whatever.

That's not a guy Frank, that's Susan Collins, Fergie's paramour and l'amour de sa vie.  It's probably the hair style that threw ya. 

  • Shocked 1
×
×
  • Create New...