leh-nerd skin-erd Posted October 21, 2024 Posted October 21, 2024 24 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: Sometimes I wish there was a word for when someone attributes their own thoughts or feelings onto others as a way of avoiding acknowledging difficult emotions… I think the word you're looking for is "trueindernationaldiprezzim". If not, it certainly sounds like it should be. 1
Doc Posted October 21, 2024 Posted October 21, 2024 8 hours ago, ChiGoose said: Can you point to me doing either of those or are you still just tilting at windmills, “doc”? It's a wonder you can even post. 1
JDHillFan Posted November 4, 2024 Posted November 4, 2024 49 minutes ago, B-Man said: . Old Style - Fully Krausened!! Anyone? Hello? Krausened? Anyone?
B-Man Posted November 11, 2024 Posted November 11, 2024 I’M SO OLD I REMEMBER WHEN THE PRESS CALLED HIM “WEIRD.”
B-Man Posted November 15, 2024 Posted November 15, 2024 J.D. Vance Proved That Republicans Should Ignore Democrat Attacks David Strom You surely recall the moaning and whining coming from the Republican bedwetters after the pick. Democrats immediately attacked Vance, and as a consequence, the Senator's favorability ratings dropped like a stone into a deep lake. Democrats chose to attack Vance as a "weird" guy who had sex with a couch because, well, it is perfectly normal for the candidates of a major political party to run on these bizarre, made-up claims. The Democrats went all-in on attacking Vance, and at first, it worked. Since most Americans knew nothing about him the Democrats rushed to define him and made a significant impression. However--and giving the lie to the Harris campaign's claim that she didn't have enough time to introduce herself to the American people--the real J.D. Vance persona reversed the initial impression. After what appeared to be a disastrous rollout, Vance not only recovered but ended the election campaign with the highest approval rating of the four candidates. He did it without the benefit of hundreds of millions in ads nor the kind of positive Pravda media coverage from which Harris and Walz benefited. He did it because he was a great candidate and a great choice by Trump. In fact, I strongly believe that he, incredibly, added to Trump's victory, which may be a first for a Vice Presidential candidate. Vice Presidential candidates are usually placeholders, not vote getters. https://hotair.com/david-strom/2024/11/14/jd-vance-proved-that-republicans-should-ignore-democrat-attacks-n3796985 1
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted November 15, 2024 Posted November 15, 2024 3 minutes ago, B-Man said: J.D. Vance Proved That Republicans Should Ignore Democrat Attacks David Strom You surely recall the moaning and whining coming from the Republican bedwetters after the pick. Democrats immediately attacked Vance, and as a consequence, the Senator's favorability ratings dropped like a stone into a deep lake. Democrats chose to attack Vance as a "weird" guy who had sex with a couch because, well, it is perfectly normal for the candidates of a major political party to run on these bizarre, made-up claims. The Democrats went all-in on attacking Vance, and at first, it worked. Since most Americans knew nothing about him the Democrats rushed to define him and made a significant impression. However--and giving the lie to the Harris campaign's claim that she didn't have enough time to introduce herself to the American people--the real J.D. Vance persona reversed the initial impression. After what appeared to be a disastrous rollout, Vance not only recovered but ended the election campaign with the highest approval rating of the four candidates. He did it without the benefit of hundreds of millions in ads nor the kind of positive Pravda media coverage from which Harris and Walz benefited. He did it because he was a great candidate and a great choice by Trump. In fact, I strongly believe that he, incredibly, added to Trump's victory, which may be a first for a Vice Presidential candidate. Vice Presidential candidates are usually placeholders, not vote getters. https://hotair.com/david-strom/2024/11/14/jd-vance-proved-that-republicans-should-ignore-democrat-attacks-n3796985 Is he ready to take over? More than a few people want to know!
JDHillFan Posted November 15, 2024 Posted November 15, 2024 2 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Is he ready to take over? More than a few people want to know! He’s too weird. Tim Walz said so. 1
Doc Posted January 20 Posted January 20 1 minute ago, Biden is Mentally Fit said: “He banged a couch. Hehehe” -Frankish I was at weekly trivia a few months back when this lie was a thing. A couple new people joined us and one of them started talking about this couch lie. She said "it's amazing what social media is doing these days!" I said "what? Lying? That's not new or amazing." 1
B-Man Posted January 22 Posted January 22 Mike Johnson Records JD Vance's First Time Seeing the Oval Office https://redstate.com/jenniferoo/2025/01/22/mike-johnson-records-vp-jd-vances-first-time-seeing-the-oval-office-its-incredible-n2184666
JDHillFan Posted January 23 Posted January 23 “No really. Here’s why the couch bit is funny. Stay with me here” -Frankish 1
B-Man Posted January 28 Posted January 28 I know that no one here will. Campaign Myths Exploded: JD Vance Is a Net Negative by Michael Brandan Dougherty It’s now become “a thing” among conservatives to wait for the JD Vance ambush of Sunday morning mainstream political media. Clips of Vance expertly handling hostile questioning from Face the Nation‘s Margaret Brennan circulate around conservative Twitter the way Michael Jordan–era highlight reels used to get played throughout the day on rebroadcasts of Sportscaster. Do we think this would be happening for Nikki Haley? Or for Doug Burgum? Is anyone among the many, many pundits who confidently explained that JD Vance was a disastrous, “net-negative” pick who “will do harm” to the ticket going to revisit his views? https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/campaign-myths-exploded-jd-vance-is-a-net-negative/ 1
Doc Posted January 28 Posted January 28 2 hours ago, B-Man said: I know that no one here will. Campaign Myths Exploded: JD Vance Is a Net Negative by Michael Brandan Dougherty It’s now become “a thing” among conservatives to wait for the JD Vance ambush of Sunday morning mainstream political media. Clips of Vance expertly handling hostile questioning from Face the Nation‘s Margaret Brennan circulate around conservative Twitter the way Michael Jordan–era highlight reels used to get played throughout the day on rebroadcasts of Sportscaster. Do we think this would be happening for Nikki Haley? Or for Doug Burgum? Is anyone among the many, many pundits who confidently explained that JD Vance was a disastrous, “net-negative” pick who “will do harm” to the ticket going to revisit his views? https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/campaign-myths-exploded-jd-vance-is-a-net-negative/ While on the flip side, they thought Walz was a great pick. 1
Recommended Posts