leh-nerd skin-erd Posted August 25 Posted August 25 27 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: “No” -Frankish “Circular reliability. It’s like straight line reliability that gets bendy.” -TFR 2 1
BillsFanNC Posted August 25 Posted August 25 Circular reporting is reliable for media lackeys and their propaganda, but it also worked for the corrupt FBI. Leak falsehoods to journalists. Reliable journalist stenographers dutifully report it with zero due diligence. Reliable reporting shows up in documents shown to FISA judge in order to bolster FBI's made up case. Wash, rinse, repeat. 1
B-Man Posted August 27 Posted August 27 They just can't help themselves. (they're reliable that way) 1
JFKjr Posted August 27 Posted August 27 15 hours ago, B-Man said: They just can't help themselves. (they're reliable that way) Have they fired the Libnut Leader who put this into place? I don't consider it 'backlash' so much as mockery. I don't care what they do with their logo, I'm just intrigued that their stock tanked over it. Seems like they're trying to please 'everybody' instead of focusing on their core customer. 1
JFKjr Posted August 31 Posted August 31 The closest the New York Times gets to reporting objective news is the word "New" in its title. 1
BillsFanNC Posted September 2 Posted September 2 Imagine being Finding and not having a single clue that this is exactly how half of the country regards the NYT and the rest of legacy media. 😂
JFKjr Posted September 2 Posted September 2 1 hour ago, JDHillFan said: People who menstruate… Pardon my language but it makes as much sense as "Washington Post writers who *****."
Recommended Posts