mcjeff215 Posted June 4, 2005 Share Posted June 4, 2005 He's as guilty as a thug basketball player attacking innocent fans. But he won't be convicted. 350714[/snapback] I disagree. I think he will get convicted. -jeff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted June 4, 2005 Share Posted June 4, 2005 I disagree. I think he will get convicted. -jeff 350904[/snapback] Based on everything I've seen and heard, the prosecution failed - egregiously - to make their case (which was NOT "Michael Jackson is a serial pedophile", but "Michael Jackson molested this particular boy in this particular instance"). It would be a grave miscarriage of justice if he were convicted. However...given that he's a freak with a long history of this crap, it would be a grave miscarriage of justice if he weren't convicted, as well. Bottom line: it's a sh------- case brought to trial in front of a sh------- judge by a sh------- prosecution team against a sh------- defending team that can only deliver the wrong conclusion no matter WHAT that conclusion is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcjeff215 Posted June 4, 2005 Share Posted June 4, 2005 Based on everything I've seen and heard, the prosecution failed - egregiously - to make their case (which was NOT "Michael Jackson is a serial pedophile", but "Michael Jackson molested this particular boy in this particular instance"). It would be a grave miscarriage of justice if he were convicted. However...given that he's a freak with a long history of this crap, it would be a grave miscarriage of justice if he weren't convicted, as well. Bottom line: it's a sh------- case brought to trial in front of a sh------- judge by a sh------- prosecution team against a sh------- defending team that can only deliver the wrong conclusion no matter WHAT that conclusion is. 350915[/snapback] The whole thing was a circus. I think something that hurts him... the defense said that Mr. Jackson would defend himself, but he's not taken the stand. I think he gets slapped for the alcohol charges and perhaps the extortion charges, but he goes free on the molestation charges. He's too much of a freak for the jury to let him off. http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0430041jacko1.html -Jeff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted June 4, 2005 Share Posted June 4, 2005 The whole thing was a circus. I think something that hurts him... the defense said that Mr. Jackson would defend himself, but he's not taken the stand. I think he gets slapped for the alcohol charges and perhaps the extortion charges, but he goes free on the molestation charges. He's too much of a freak for the jury to let him off. http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0430041jacko1.html -Jeff 350938[/snapback] Of course, the prosecution did make a decent case for the alcohol charges, and a fair one for extortion. The molestation, though...like I've been saying for weeks now, the prosecution blew that the moment they attacked his character; it was a de facto admission that they couldn't make their case, and handed the defense immediate and very effective grounds for appeal if by some chance the jury returned a guilty verdict. My sister's a defense attorney; she's been laughing her ass off at the ineptitude of the prosecution. They're making OJ's prosecutors look competent... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jarthur31 Posted June 4, 2005 Share Posted June 4, 2005 Guilty or not guilty? I'm saying GUILTY! 350713[/snapback] Huh? Then why didn't the prosecutor give closing arguments? I hope the sorry S.O.B. loses his job and never gains employment in government again. Would everybody on this board be so forgiving if their local D.A. shitted on a similar case before it even began if it happened to a kid or family they knew? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jarthur31 Posted June 4, 2005 Share Posted June 4, 2005 The prosecution are idiots for using a family of sleazebags as the accusers. Jacko is gonna moonwalk! PTR 350730[/snapback] LMAO! I needed that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted June 4, 2005 Share Posted June 4, 2005 if you guys could look past whats on E! everyday, you'd see this is a very important moment in American history if MJ walks, we have to sign him as our placekicker i mean anybody has got to better than Lindell!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoachChuckDickerson Posted June 4, 2005 Share Posted June 4, 2005 Based on everything I've seen and heard, the prosecution failed - egregiously - to make their case (which was NOT "Michael Jackson is a serial pedophile", but "Michael Jackson molested this particular boy in this particular instance"). It would be a grave miscarriage of justice if he were convicted. Way to read only the headlines......Oh well. The only thing I can say is if the jury lets him go they should be forced to employ Mike as their babysitter once a week. This case is about one thing and one thing only. MONEY. If you had a single 46 year old man living down the street from you who liked to have young boys come over for sleep overs...what do you think would happen to that dude? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoachChuckDickerson Posted June 4, 2005 Share Posted June 4, 2005 if MJ walks, we have to sign him as our placekicker i mean anybody has got to better than Lindell!!! 350962[/snapback] I HAVE HEARD OF HIM!!!! Get er done TD!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted June 4, 2005 Share Posted June 4, 2005 Way to read only the headlines......Oh well. The only thing I can say is if the jury lets him go they should be forced to employ Mike as their babysitter once a week. This case is about one thing and one thing only. MONEY. If you had a single 46 year old man living down the street from you who liked to have young boys come over for sleep overs...what do you think would happen to that dude? 350995[/snapback] Way to not even read so much as the headlines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoachChuckDickerson Posted June 4, 2005 Share Posted June 4, 2005 Way to not even read so much as the headlines. 351020[/snapback] The prosecution got WAY more evidence into that trial than they should have been allowed to. The judge had to tell the jury to disregard much of the information presented regarding wackos previous behavior. Even if they are told to disregard it, they still heard it. Prosecution actually did a pretty good job. Money talks though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted June 4, 2005 Share Posted June 4, 2005 The prosecution got WAY more evidence into that trial than they should have been allowed to. The judge had to tell the jury to disregard much of the information presented regarding wackos previous behavior. Even if they are told to disregard it, they still heard it. Prosecution actually did a pretty good job. Money talks though. 351025[/snapback] No, prosecution did a horrible job, in choosing an easily impeachable plaintiff and then compounding it by introducing irrelevent and ultimately prejudicial evidence that gives the defense excellent grounds for appeal. Even if the jury comes back with a guilty verdict - which they shouldn't, as the prosecution didn't prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt, as they themselves admitted by introducing testimony concerning assumed prior bad acts that the judge never should have allowed in the first place - the appellate court will almost certainly toss the case on the grounds of reversible error. And if money talks, how come Jackson's defense team was so inept as to allow the BS testimony the prosecution admitted? I know public defenders who do a better job than Jacko's team of monkeys has managed. This case has been horribly mismanaged by all parties from the start... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffaloed in Pa Posted June 5, 2005 Share Posted June 5, 2005 Guilty or not guilty? I'm saying GUILTY! 350713[/snapback] He`s as guilty as the JUICE..who is out onthose golf courses ever day on his endless search for the killer...Cally , What ajoke that place is?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corp000085 Posted June 5, 2005 Share Posted June 5, 2005 . What's black & white and comes in small cans????? 350863[/snapback] Knock Knock Who's there? Little Boy Blue Little Boy Blue who? Michael Jackson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tcali Posted June 5, 2005 Share Posted June 5, 2005 Ok, it just seemed like you wanted to go to bed with him, my fault. Fag............... 350903[/snapback] The internet tough guy--who wouldn't dare insult people in person. 'fag'??...'idiot'??--you are pathetic to throw those words around. How about 'sad' for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IAFINFAN Posted June 5, 2005 Share Posted June 5, 2005 I don't know if he will serve time but can't imagine how nasty he will like when his perm grows out and his nose falls off. Dude won't be able to get groomed in prison like he can at Neverland. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted June 5, 2005 Share Posted June 5, 2005 I don't know if he will serve time but can't imagine how nasty he will like when his perm grows out and his nose falls off. Dude won't be able to get groomed in prison like he can at Neverland. 351363[/snapback] Don't sentence him to prison, sentence him to aging naturally without any cosmetic assistance. In three months - six, tops - he'll be such a repulsive ghoul that no little boy would go anywhere near him. Problem solved... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erynthered Posted June 5, 2005 Share Posted June 5, 2005 The internet tough guy--who wouldn't dare insult people in person. 'fag'??...'idiot'??--you are pathetic to throw those words around. How about 'sad' for you. 351358[/snapback] To the internet Idiot: Tough guy? Not in the least. I said my fault, and put some smilies in there to indicate as much. Not enough groveling I guess. Maybe something struck home. Signed: Someone who wouldnt let his kids sleep with M. Jackson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe in NC Posted June 6, 2005 Share Posted June 6, 2005 Knock Knock Who's there? Little Boy Blue Little Boy Blue who? Michael Jackson 351317[/snapback] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe in NC Posted June 6, 2005 Share Posted June 6, 2005 Knock Knock Who's there? Little Boy Blue Little Boy Blue who? Michael Jackson 351317[/snapback] Why does Michael Jackson like twenty eight year old boys?............... There are 20 of them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(2).thumb.jpeg.6e78fe3142ec9e6bfedbf027610db26f.jpeg)
Recommended Posts