Numark3 Posted July 14, 2020 Share Posted July 14, 2020 6 minutes ago, Joe in Winslow said: You're not required to read/respond if it's beneath one of your obviously luminous intellect. projecting much ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted July 14, 2020 Author Share Posted July 14, 2020 2 minutes ago, Crayola64 said: projecting much ? No? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numark3 Posted July 14, 2020 Share Posted July 14, 2020 Just now, Joe in Winslow said: No? well I never referred to myself as that, and it came from you, so um anyways. What’s the point of this thread again? It’s literally a tweet (“I rarely post tweets”) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted July 14, 2020 Author Share Posted July 14, 2020 Just now, Crayola64 said: well I never referred to myself as that, and it came from you, so um anyways. What’s the point of this thread again? It’s literally a tweet (“I rarely post tweets”) Rarely is not a subset of "never." But I'm sure you knew that, seeing as you're not a fourth-rate attorney. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
\GoBillsInDallas/ Posted July 14, 2020 Share Posted July 14, 2020 1 hour ago, Joe in Winslow said: Not sure which thread this would be germane to, so here goes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubs Posted July 14, 2020 Share Posted July 14, 2020 You know a topic hits close to the bullseye when it immediately becomes infested with Soros NPC bots. good work JiW 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numark3 Posted July 14, 2020 Share Posted July 14, 2020 1 minute ago, Joe in Winslow said: Rarely is not a subset of "never." But I'm sure you knew that, seeing as you're not a fourth-rate attorney. what would a subset of never be??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted July 14, 2020 Share Posted July 14, 2020 Well, another thread ruined by a concerned troll. {sigh} Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numark3 Posted July 14, 2020 Share Posted July 14, 2020 Just now, Buffalo_Gal said: Well, another thread ruined by a concerned troll. {sigh} im sorry, but that “subset of never” phrase is actually interesting (way more than this thread....which was a tweet) is. I’m being sincere Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted July 14, 2020 Author Share Posted July 14, 2020 1 minute ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Well, another thread ruined by a concerned troll. {sigh} As trolls go, he's pretty inefficient. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numark3 Posted July 14, 2020 Share Posted July 14, 2020 Just now, Joe in Winslow said: As trolls go, he's pretty inefficient. don’t get away from your philosophical subsets of never!! You were onto something Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted July 14, 2020 Share Posted July 14, 2020 Just now, Joe in Winslow said: As trolls go, he's pretty inefficient. True. At least he isn't posting dancing male genitalia. Point in his favor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numark3 Posted July 14, 2020 Share Posted July 14, 2020 we know rarely is not a subset of never (very astute). But what is a subset of never? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted July 14, 2020 Share Posted July 14, 2020 49 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: He's not wrong... This happened yesterday. Now, Mike Cernvich may not be everyone's cup of tea, and I have no idea who Owen Benjamin is (supposedly he's out there), but there are people bringing lawsuits fighting back. (It is worth reading the entire thread. These are simply bits and pieces.) People seem to feel this may have repercussions against PayPal and even, banks. We shall see. Ppp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOBUFFALO716 Posted July 14, 2020 Share Posted July 14, 2020 15 minutes ago, dubs said: You know a topic hits close to the bullseye when it immediately becomes infested with Soros NPC bots. good work JiW CLASSIC MUD PIE If you’re a fellow chocoholic, then this recipe for Classic Mud Pie is calling your name. It has a chocolate cookie crust, a dense ice-cream filling, and is topped with fudge, whipped cream, and cookie crumbs. It’s easy to make and is our go-to easy dessert recipe when we need something a little more special than cookies or cake! If you know me or have read this blog any amount of time, you know I love PIE. And this Classic Mud Pie is no exception. It has all the wonderful flavors of a chocolatey ice cream treat, but is dressed up as a fully loaded pie. It’s thick, silky, and packed with chocolate cookies, ice cream, fudge, and of course, whipped cream. Who could say no to this recipe? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numark3 Posted July 14, 2020 Share Posted July 14, 2020 Anyone know what a subset of nothing would be? It is killing me. I feel like that cat lost in time and space Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted July 14, 2020 Author Share Posted July 14, 2020 10 minutes ago, Crayola64 said: we know rarely is not a subset of never (very astute). But what is a subset of never? Not ever. Not under any condition. Not at all. Not in any way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numark3 Posted July 14, 2020 Share Posted July 14, 2020 1 minute ago, Joe in Winslow said: Not ever. Not under any condition. Not at all. Not in any way. wouldn’t that just be never though? Like a 1:1 overlap. Rather than a subset. can you have something that is “never” (meaning it would be part of that) but first Th we defined (a subset)? It is interesting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted July 14, 2020 Author Share Posted July 14, 2020 1 minute ago, Crayola64 said: wouldn’t that just be never though? Like a 1:1 overlap. Rather than a subset. can you have something that is “never” (meaning it would be part of that) but first Th we defined (a subset)? It is interesting Not really. Never seems a more...all-encompassing single word. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numark3 Posted July 14, 2020 Share Posted July 14, 2020 1 minute ago, Joe in Winslow said: Not really. Never seems a more...all-encompassing single word. Never is definitely broader, but not really wouldn’t be a part of it because they are inconsistent. I don’t think there is an answer tbh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts